1: Preamble
Meizu 's mobile phone has always been criticized by many players in terms of taking photos. Although it has always been eye-catching in terms of lens parameters, the sample effect taken can not withstand scrutiny, and when everyone has no hope for Meizu, PRO 6s When we came here, the new Sony IMX386 CMOS plus four axis optical anti shake combination seemed to give hope to life all of a sudden. Can the PRO 6s speak for itself with the new lens module? Let's have a look.
2: Photo experience
In terms of viewfinder frame, PRO 6s has maintained its previous simple design, but unfortunately, it is still a bit anti human to operate in the way of click. Most custom systems now use sliding instead of most click operations, which can improve the operating experience, and second, users can focus more on shooting without being distracted by operations. The second thing worth complaining about is the unreasonable layout. For example, the manual mode and HDR mode with high density are placed at the second level. If users want to use them, they must click back and forth to switch, which is really confusing. Finally, there is light metering. The PRO 6s can separate light metering and focusing when taking photos, which is intended to be good, but compared with the direct sliding exposure adjustment method currently used by mainstream mobile phones, it is cumbersome and not intuitive.
After talking about the disadvantages, let's talk about the advantages. The imaging speed of PRO 6s is greatly improved compared with PRO 6, especially in weak light. Although there is still a waiting time, it is already within the acceptable range. In addition, thanks to the addition of optical anti shake, the film rate of PRO 6s has been greatly improved. These two improvements have greatly improved the overall photo taking experience of PRO 6s. It can also be seen that Meizu has made great efforts in taking photos. Although there are still shortcomings in operation, they do not cover up the shortcomings. It is not easy to have such an improvement in image experience.
3： Sample comparison
From the official publicity, we can see that they are very confident in the imaging of the PRO 6s. The PRO 6s use Sony's latest IMX386 CMOS, with 12 million pixels, F/2.0 aperture, and 6P lenses. It supports phase focusing and optical anti shake, which is very powerful in terms of specifications. It is worth praising for abandoning the pursuit of high pixels. In view of the specifications of PRO 6s in this test, we also selected several popular mobile phone models to participate in the comparison, which are the previous generation flagship PRO 6, Xiaomi 5s and One Plus 3 of Meizu. To ensure fairness, all samples are based on automatic focusing and automatic metering, and HDR is closed. The order of samples is from the top left: PRO 6s， Top right: PRO 6， Bottom left: millet 5s, bottom right one plus 3.
Daytime proof sheet:
Comparison 1:
The white balance of PRO 6s in comparison sample 1 is the closest to that seen by the naked eye, while millet 5s is blue. After zooming in, we can see that the processing of one plus three pairs of details is more excellent.
Comparison II:
Compared with the second sample, we can see that the tolerance of one plus three is the best. The details of the nearby leaves are still clear. After zooming in, one plus three continues to lead the way. The details of building boards and leaves are well preserved, while the other three have lost the details of leaves to varying degrees.
Comparison 3:
The PRO 6 in the third comparison sample did not leave the opponent in detail because of the large pixels. After zooming in, we can see that the word "Yongmao" is basically equivalent to the 1200W pixels such as PRO 6s and Xiaomi 5s. On the contrary, the details of one plus three are obviously better than the other three, and the font is sharp and clear, which is worthy of praise.
Comparison 4:
The performance of the four mobile phones in the fourth comparison sample is very good. On the whole, one plus three retains the most details in the near and far, and the image is the cleanest after zooming in.
Comparison 5:
Comparison 6:
In the comparison sample sheet 6, it can be seen that one plus three pairs of wood are restored to the best position, the gaps between the wood are clear, and the appearance is also the best, while the other three have smearing marks, which gives a greasy feeling.
Macro contrast:
Comparison 1:
In the comparison sample, the white balance of PRO 6s is the most accurate. When you zoom in, you can see that the details of stamens photographed by one plus three are the best, followed by PRO 6/6s.
Comparison II:
In the comparison sample sheet 2, PRO 6 is the best. Both the details of flowers and the veins of green leaves are very good, followed by Xiaomi 5s and PRO 6S, and one plus three is inferior.
Comparison 3:
Tolerance comparison:
Comparison 1 (HDR is enabled for this group of samples):
The first comparison sample is mainly to test the HDR effect of four mobile phones. In the high contrast scene, everyone performs well on the whole. The outline and details of the building can be displayed. After enlarging the sample, it can be seen that the details of the trees in the sample taken by one plus three are the best, and the other three have lost details to varying degrees
Comparison II:
Compared with the PRO 6 in the second sample sheet, the performance of PRO 6 is obviously better than the other three. Both the words on the nearby stone surface and the details of the stairs in the distance have been restored very well. It should be noted that HDR has been turned off for all four mobile phones in this group of samples, which is worth praising.
Comparison 3:
The performance of the four mobile phones in the third comparison sample is good, but the details of one plus three after zooming in are still better than the other three.
Night sample:
Sample sheet 1:
Through the comparison of the samples, it can be seen that PRO 6s does not boast this time. The overall brightness is better than the other three. The details are also kept very well after zooming in, and the purity is also controlled very well. The only thing that can complain is that the overall color is red, and once added three times, the details are good. Unfortunately, the noise is obvious. Xiaomi 5s needs to complain about it, After the author has focused on this scene for many times, it is impossible to focus on it, whether it is auto focusing or manual focusing. After research, it is found that Xiaomi 5s can easily fail to focus on it in weak light if the focus is the light source. I hope Xiaomi officials can solve this problem through firmware upgrade as soon as possible.
Sample sheet 2:
The PRO 6s in the second comparison sample continued to lead in brightness. When zooming in to see details, the purity of PRO 6s was the best, followed by Xiaomi 5s. The purity was good, but the brightness was slightly low. When adding 3 and PRO 6, the noise was more obvious, affecting the appearance.
Sample sheet 3:
Three in one and three in the contrast sample achieve the counter attack. The sample picture is very clean, the overall color returns to reality, and the details are rich after magnification, followed by PRO 6s.
Sample 4:
The fourth comparison sample is mainly to check the glare control of four mobile phones. It can be seen from the comparison that PRO 6s has the best glare control, the picture brightness is high, and the building details in the background are kept in place. Xiaomi 5s and one plus three have obvious light spots, and Xiaomi 5s has obvious smearing marks.
Sample sheet 5:
Sample sheet 6:
Compared with the PRO 6s one plus three in the sixth sample sheet, the performance of PRO 6s one plus three is the best, not only the main body is clear, but also the details on the ceiling have been restored well. In contrast, the Xiaomi 5s has been integrated into one piece. After zooming in the details, PRO 6s and one plus three pairs of signboard fonts and boards have been restored very well, PRO 6s has a higher purity but a slightly lower sharpness, while the one plus three font is more three-dimensional, but the noise is relatively obvious. Xiaomi 5s has a big gap from the former, not only the main body is blurry, but also has a lot of noise.
Sample sheet 7:
4： Summary
After a round of comparison, we believe that the photo performance of PRO 6s is obvious to all. Compared with our own PRO 6, it has made a qualitative leap. It is at the same level with one plus three and Xiaomi 5s when the light is sufficient in the daytime. When the light is weak at night, PRO 6s is even more surprising. With the addition of a new lens module and optical anti shake, the exposure time is longer, The ISO is lower, in return for the improvement of brightness and purity. From this time of proof comparison, it can be found that although the PRO 6s cannot be said to leave the opponent in the weak light, most of the scenes are better than the opponent in the weak light, and the hat that has been criticized by the players for the camera residue can finally be taken off. Are you satisfied with the photo performance of PRO 6s? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
