Over the "Cup" Campaign, vivo X100 Pro Evaluation: Tianji 9300+True · Image Flagship
Over the "Cup" Campaign, vivo X100 Pro Evaluation: Tianji 9300+True · Image Flagship

The first launch of Tianji 9300, the vivo X100 and X100 Pro, was released on November 13, and the vivo X100 Pro is known as "a super large cup for friends and merchants". The performance, telephoto, endurance and fast charging compatibility of this generation have been greatly enhanced, but the price is from 4999 yuan, which is 500 yuan lower than that of the previous generation.

The last time Vivo "forced the Pro to lift the cup without Pro+" was a year and a half ago, the Vivo X80 series.

X100 Pro launches Tianji 9300+vivo V3 (4K portrait video) for the first time. 6.78 "1.5K LTPO curved screen+2160Hz high-frequency PWM, main camera 1" IMX989+JN1 ultra wide angle+4.3 times 5000W F2.5 periscope macro zoom (1/2.51 "available). 5400mAh battery+100W fast charge+50W wireless charge, IP68+HiFi chip.

RMB 4999 for 12+256 version, RMB 5499 for 16+512 version, and RMB 5999 for 16+1TB LPDDR5T version.

PS: rumored new The super large cup will not come out until nearly half a year later, so it may not belong to X100 series.


Appearance&Workmanship&Hand&Fingerprint Identification&External Release&Vibration

The vivo X100 Pro is a 100W wired fast charge, but the official configuration head is a new 120W GaN charging head.

It is still the V12060L0A0-CN of Jinhu OEM, but it "stealthily" increases the power of PPS public protocol from 65W to 100W, which is compatible with PD/QC5 and UFS.

This is the most environmentally friendly official configuration (the public protocol specification is the strongest, and the notebook is available and will fight in the future).



vivo X90、vivo X100 Pro、iQOO 12 Pro↑


Vivo X90, vivo X100 Pro, iQOO 12 Pro ↑

The camera of the vivo X100 Pro is an asymmetric "solar ring cloud stage" design. Compared with the standard version of left-right asymmetry, the persecution of obsessive-compulsive disorder is a bit shallow.

The prominence of the camera part is more obvious than that of the standard version, but on the premise that the fuselage is thinner, the prominence is not as exaggerated as that of the previous generation.

Although he gave up the waist cover design, this handsome boy still thinks that this generation should be handsome.

  • work Excellent.

  • feel OK, but the glass version 225g (the plain leather version is 221g like the X90 Pro+) is really the flagship weight of the image.

  • Short focal fingerprint : The speed is OK, and the position is lower.

  • External release: The performance is average, the volume is enough, but the sound quality is a bit thin, and the sound field is on the right.

  • Vibration: The whole system is upgraded from 0809 to 9595 X-axis motor, and the strength and tightness are in line with the standard.

  • There are IP68, infrared, and rare HiFi chips.


Performance: the first Tianji 9300

Vivo X100 series launched Tianji 9300 for the first time.

The Tianji 9300 is the third-generation 4nm process of TSMC, with a 1+3+4 structure, one 3.25GHz X4+3x2.85GHz X4+four 2.0GHz A720 (no small core), and the GPU is Immortalis-G720 MC12 1.3GHz.

  • One 3.25GHz X4 super core, 64KB L1 cache, 1MB L2 cache

  • Three 2.85GHz X4 super cores, 64KB L1 cache, 512KB L2 cache

  • Four 2.0GHz A720 cores, 32KB L1 cache, 256KB L2 cache

  • 8MB L3 cache, 10MB system cache (Tianji 9200 is 8MBL3, 6MB system cache)

The first LPDDR5T 9600Mbps memory is released for the top configuration of X100 series, and the common version is LPDDR5x 8533Mbps memory.

The memory of the first LPDDR5T 9600Mbps is 12.5% faster than the previous LPDDR5x 8533Mbps, which is the frequency that people think can be reached only after LPDDR6 (Tianji 9000 was the first LPDDR 5x 7500Mbps memory two years ago, and Tianji 9200 was the first LPDDR5x 8533Mbps).

Hynix announced in August that it would complete LPDDR5T verification on Tianji 9300, and Micron announced on October 26 that it would start shipping 9600Mbps LPDDR5x samples, which is also the only 1 β (1-beta) memory, Meguiar 1 β The process node claims to save 30% of electricity and is said to be produced for Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but it is expected to be mass produced next year.

The bandwidth of LPDDR5T is the same as that of the 9600Mbps LPDDR5x. It is unknown whether there is a power consumption difference between them.

CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)


GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)


Flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar is for each column, the stronger it is)

Tianji 9300 is real Today's strongest mobile phone chip, CPU, GPU, energy efficiency three kill Qualcomm And different from the generation of Tianji 9000, this is the blood rich Qualcomm that has not been delayed by Samsung technology.

In the vivo X100 Pro test results The performance of flash memory is not normal Except for random reading and writing, the rest of the data are low, especially random writing, even worse than Tianji 9200, for unknown reasons (the AndroBench we used was out of repair for a long time, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Tianji 9300 models could not be installed, so we changed to "Egg Mark" for testing).


Actual use, vivo X100 Pro The scheduling is tough, and 8 cores can be fully opened at the highest frequency at the moment of application switching (Not just cold start). Most of the time, three low-frequency X4s are preferred. After the fuselage is heated, it is locked at 2.6GHz for the super core and 1.8GHz for the super core. The energy efficiency of high load is higher than that of Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and the temperature is significantly lower than that of Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 model when the machine is changed by one button.

I don't know whether it is related to vivo's system or the performance is too high. Whether it is Tianji 9300 or Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, whether it is a power saving mode or a normal mode, the daily use fluency can't open the gap (WeChat applet needs the highest frequency in the whole core, but the current bottle neck, the response speed in Tencent server...)

On the contrary, in the game, the performance of Tianji 9300 improved immediately : vivo X100 Pro opens Peace Elite, just like a small game, in non performance mode, cold start 7 seconds into the loading page, and you can see the login page flash past in 8 seconds


Ah, yes. Stronger memory mainly affects GPU performance. Even the Tianji 9300 with LPDDR5x memory is better than Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in overall performance, For non heavy game users, there is no need to specially top configure LPDDR5T memory.


(Room temperature 25.2 degrees, 200 nit screen brightness)

Although the energy efficiency of Tianji 9300 is higher than that of the previous generation Running with all strength is definitely not a fuel saving light , resulting in the general thermal stability of vivo X100 Pro:

  • The maximum temperature of 3DMark toaster is 49.5 degrees.

  • 3DMark Wild Life Ulimited test stability 52%, Extreme Ulimited test stability 65.4%, Solar Bay test stability 54.6%



and For daily use, the temperature performance is OK: The room temperature is 26.5 degrees, and the vivo X100 Pro performs normally after 20 minutes of Elite of Peace HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing. The maximum temperature is 39.5 degrees.


The power of vivo X100 Pro drops to 6%, the highest frequency will be limited to 900MHz, and then the energy efficiency will soar in situ (running stability test will power on, When the power drops to 6%, the power consumption of the whole machine remains about 1.5W ↑ ):

  • Run the 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited pressure test with 2% power (8% power is required for performance mode), run the 3DMark performance test twice with 1% power, and complete the GeekBench 6+GeekBench 5 test with 1% power.

  • At this time, the single core performance is not as good as Tianji 700, but the multi-core even has Snapdragon 865 level, and the GPU is better than the early Tianji 8100.

  • At this time, it is used because the multi-core performance is not weak, and the global 120Hz high brush is still maintained, and the frame is not locked.

  • The smoothness of mobile phones and midrange phones, As a result, the final 6% charge is extremely durable. It's terrible. It even makes me feel that the world is a bit unreal ↓


Objective test: screen&heating&endurance&charging

The vivo X100 series are 6.78 inch 1.5K 120Hz 8T LTPO curved screens, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, 2800x1260452ppi, and local peak brightness 3000 nits.

The screen of vivo X100 Pro is a mixture of BOE and Vicino. We and Teacher Feiwei's X100 Pro are both Vicino screens. The following is the test data of Vicino version ↓


(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)

The brightness of the iQOO 12 Pro is not as good as that of the top Samsung E7 screen, but it actually performs well, winning most of the screens of the previous year.

In manual full white, the four corner brightness is 565/562/570/573 nits, the maximum difference is 11 nits, and the uniformity is good.

The P3 color accuracy of the factory default mode and the sRGB color accuracy of the professional mode are better.

Compared with the screen of the previous generation X90/X90 Pro, the appearance and test data have made great progress.

and The biggest regret is that the degree of eye protection is average. The medium and high brightness of indoor lighting is more commonly used, and 360 Hz low-frequency PWM dimming is used. Fortunately, the width of the black stripe does not change with the brightness decline.


(Endurance test: the test environment is 26 ℃ at room temperature, 200 nit screen brightness, Test power range 30% to 80% Including 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surfing respectively, 2.5 hours in total)

The vivo X100 Pro is 5400mAh dual cell+100W fast charging+50W wireless charging, and also has the strongest 100W PPS compatible+UFCS. Blue Ocean battery claimed that the energy density was increased by 8.3%, and the energy gathering IC claimed that the discharge efficiency was 99.5%.

The actual endurance performance is in the first echelon, but it does not meet the expected 5400mAh battery

The crazy endurance of less than 6% charge and the speed of 5 minutes before the charging test (pay attention to the first 5 minutes in the charging test below), we suspect, Vivo may hide the extra 400mAh power into the last 6%, so as long as it is not "dead", it cannot reflect the effect of 5400mAh battery (Our test is in the range of 30% to 80%.).


The peak charge of vivo X100 Pro is 83W, but only lasts for 40 seconds. Then 66W, 54W, 48W, 43W after 10 minutes and 13 minutes.


(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo super fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent super fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low power fast charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default and need to turn them on manually)

It takes 32 minutes for the vivo X100 Pro to be fully charged, and when it displays 100%, it will be disconnected, Normal 100W performance.

In addition, The vivo X100 series is the mobile phone with the strongest charging compatibility, They all have 100W PPS, and the standard version can exceed 5A current (the instantaneous power exceeds 100W, which may lead to automatic restart of some mobile power supplies due to excessive power), and is also compatible with domestic UFS integrated fast charging protocol.

The two brothers can High power PPS with many laptops or charging heads from friends However, it should be noted that PPS fast charging is not the same as PD fast charging New charging head/mobile power supply High power PPS.


Photo: fight over the cup. Sorry, X90 Pro+

Vivo X100 Pro first launched vivo V3 self developed image chip (6nm process, energy efficiency increased by 30%, concurrent AI perception, support 4K portrait video+game insertion frame of up to 120 frames):

  • Front 3200W, 1/2.8 ", F2.0

  • Main camera 5000W, IMX989, 1/0.98 ", 1.6 μ m. F1.75+OIS, equivalent to 23mm. CIPA4.5 anti shake, new ZEISS T * coating, factory correction and compensation one by one

  • 5000W JN1 ultra wide angle, 1/2.76 ", 0.64 μ m. F2.0, equivalent 15mm, 15cm micro pitch

  • 4.3 times periscope macro telephoto, 5000W, 1/2 "(6400W OV64B is cut into 5000W, 1/2.51" for use), F2.5+OIS, equivalent 100mm, 18cm macro, 1:2 equivalent amplification ZEISS floating mirror set, CIPA4.0 anti shake, ZEISS APO Certification , claiming that the light input is 97% higher than X90 Pro+telephoto.

The vivo X100 Pro has a 4.3 times telephoto, and the lens only covers 78% of the center of the OV64B 64 million pixels, so the imaging is 50 million pixels, and the default focus segment is equivalent to 100 mm (4.3 times).

In addition, when the main shot is between 4.3 times the telephoto, Not like X90 Pro+ In that way, the IMX989 is all supporting 1.1 times to 4.2 times (At least as of November 28, there was no firmware).

So let's not mention it. This time, our competitors include (both Xiaomi and Vivo are Leica's vivid mode, and Vivo is the vivid mode):

  • Xiaomi 14 Pro (F1.4 variable aperture 1/1.31 "light and shadow hunter 900 main camera+JN1 ultra wide angle+JN1 3.2 times vertical telephoto)

  • Xiaomi 13 Ultra (1-inch IMX989 main camera+IMX858 ultra wide angle, 3.2x telephoto, 5x periscope telephoto) responsible for the bright day

  • OPPO Find X6 Pro (IMX989 main camera, IMX890 super wide angle+IMX890 2.7 times periscope telephoto) Responsible for lighting and weak light scenes


Ultra wide angle contrast

Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 5, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 6, global and central amplification


Main camera, 2x, high pixel mode comparison

Main camera contrast 1, global and light and shade amplification

 

High pixel mode contrast 2, central amplification


"2x zoom" contrast 2, central magnification


Main camera contrast 2, global and light and dark parts amplification



High pixel mode contrast 2, light and dark parts enlarged


"2x zoom" contrast 3, central magnification


Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification


High pixel mode contrast 3, central amplification


"2x zoom" contrast 3, central magnification


Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 7, global and central amplification


Main camera "2x zoom", global and central magnification


Long focus contrast: 3.2x, 4.3x, 5x, 10x

4.3 times contrast, global and central amplification (Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


3.2x contrast 1, central amplification (contrast Xiaomi 14 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


5x contrast 1, central magnification (contrast Xiaomi 14 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


10x contrast 1, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


3.2x contrast 2, central amplification (contrast Xiaomi 14 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


10x contrast 2, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


3.2x contrast 3, central amplification (contrast Xiaomi 14 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra)


10x contrast 3, central magnification


3.2x contrast 4, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)



5x contrast 4, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


10x contrast 4, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


3.2x contrast 5, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


10x contrast 4, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


3.2x contrast 6, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


5x vs. 6, central magnification (vs. Xiaomi 14 Pro vs. Find X6 Pro)


10x contrast 6, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)


3.2x contrast 7, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)



5x contrast 7, central magnification (contrast Xiaomi 14 Pro and Find X6 Pro)



10x contrast 7, central magnification (compare Xiaomi 14 Pro with Find X6 Pro)

Summary

The photo taking experience of vivo X100 Pro is very similar to that of X90 Pro+. At first, the shutter response will be a little slow, but if you are crazy, it will reduce the strength of multi frame synthesis, and then become a shutter machine gun (at the cost of "sandwich", the sample processing behind is not complete)

  1. The main daytime details and noise reduction are weaker than Xiaomi 13 Ultra (noise reduction is not very hard, unlike the vivo I know), but only a little stronger than Xiaomi 14 Pro. Only after the light scene can it exert the advantage of powerful highlight suppression, which is slightly stronger than Xiaomi 13U. Two 1-inch millet 14 Pro with 1/1.31 "aperture are rolled under weak light.

  2. The most surprising thing is that the JN1 ultra wide angle, with a slightly larger aperture, has not lost too much of the IMX890 ultra wide angle of the Find X6 Pro at night, and it is not weak in the daytime( Friendly business is relatively weak JN1

  3. The metering of the telephoto is slightly bright, the rate of dark light is exaggerated, and the interlacing is fierce during continuous shooting. Because 3.2 times of the Friends are physical telephotos, and the vivo X100 Pro does not engage in multi camera integration, it lost a lot. But after 4.3 times, including 5 times and 10 times, it directly pressed the Friends Hammer. I'm afraid only the 10 times telephoto of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra can compete with it.

Conclusion: The main camera and 1-inch friend's 5-50 split, super wide-angle super play, the telephoto is invincible as long as it can be triggered, but there is no multi shot fusion, leaving 2.1 to 4.2 times of the huge focal section open.

summary

In order to set iQOO 12 Pro and vivo X100 Pro at 4999 yuan, vivo has made accurate segmentation of user groups and started to make iQOO and vivo brands significantly different:

  • IQOO 12 Pro has exclusive ultrasonic fingerprint, stronger 2K screen, speaker and motor (full 16G memory).

  • The vivo X100 Pro is image enhanced, with IMX989 and a more powerful 4.3 times APO telephoto.

If you want all of them, you have to wait for half a year before coming to the Super Bowl.

The vivo X100 Pro is priced more than 500 yuan (from 4999 yuan) lower than the previous generation after the enhanced compatibility of performance, telephoto, endurance and fast charging.

  • It is true that the image of "Big Cup vs Big Cup" is true, but the biggest regret is not the ultra wide angle specification, but that 4.3 times of the telephoto left too large a focal gap. If the later OTA can add the multi shot fusion algorithm, it will be a winner, but it is a pity.

  • The performance of Tianji 9300 is exaggerated, and the effect of super endurance mode at 6% power is even more exaggerated, while 100W PPS is very conscientious and environmentally friendly.

  • The biggest regret is that the 2K screen is not available, the medium and high brightness is not enough to protect the eyes, and the short focus fingerprint.

But looking at the starting price of 4999 yuan, I still have to bow my head: sorry, I admit that I spoke a little louder just now.


Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer

Follow our WeChat official account: playphone

Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer

Share:
Charles Fang
Ordinary geek
Benefits!

Scan QR code and follow the author

Share Weibo Share WeChat
 Aigoji WeChat

Aigoji WeChat

 WeChat

WeChat

Recommended products

Sorry, the product you are looking for is not available in the product library

on trial