Coincidentally OPPO Find X7 Ultra Just cut the price+image OTA (upgrade 10-13.2x algorithm+four shot 4K 60FPS Dolby Vision video), and Xiaomi 14 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and vivo X100 Pro The image firmware of the Vivo X100 Ultra is also basically finalized. It is estimated that the Vivo X100 Ultra will come in a month and a half at the earliest. Let's compare and supplement the flagship photos of the draft for several months.
This is not a strict photo review, but mainly to see the level of the current flagship in the daytime and lighting scenes.
The current flagship of four photographic images has six focus segments (ultra wide angle+main camera+main camera 2x+3 times long camera+5 times long camera+6 times long camera+2x digital zoom). There are too many models and focus segments. This time, we will not compare the high pixel mode, RAW mode and extremely weak light scenes.
Comparison of camera specifications of four flagship As follows ↓
According to international practice, Xiaomi is a vivid Leica, and other manufacturers use the factory default mode of full automatic focusing+automatic metering.
The samples are uniformly arranged according to global+central amplification. The magnified samples have been magnified in a super scale, so that the difference can be seen at a glance in the size of the thumbnail. 4K version pictures can be found in Love to play computer games View the official website.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle specification: Find X7 Ultra>Xiaomi 14 Ultra>Galaxy S24 Ultra>vivo X100 Pro
Angle of view: Xiaomi 14 Ultra>Galaxy S24 Ultra>Find X7 Ultra>vivo X100 Pro
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, lower left corner edge enlarged
Ultra wide angle comparison 1, global
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 5, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast and "2x zoom" contrast
Compared with the previous generation of IMX989, the 1-inch Sony LYT-900 of Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Find X7 Ultra mainly improves energy efficiency and dynamic atmosphere. The difference in actual use is far less than the difference in algorithm between manufacturers. However, the specifications of LYT-900 and IMX989 are obviously stronger than the 1/1.3 inch HP2 of Samsung S24 Ultra.
Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast, zoom in at the center and below the center
Dominant contrast 2, global
Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast 3, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast 5, zoom in below the center
Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast 6, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast 7, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 8, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" comparison, global and central magnification
3. x contrast
Four mobile phones have three different mid-range focus: Xiaomi 14 Ultra is 3.2 times (this generation has not been cut), Galaxy S24 Ultra is 3 times, Find X7 Ultra is 2.7 times physical (3 times output is provided by default), and vivo X100 Pro is 4.3 times (OV64B is cut to 50 million pixels, equivalent to 1/2.51).
If the vivo is also adjusted to 3 times, it will be a bit inhumane. It's not necessary to play the IMX989 "3 times zoom" at all
"Three times" comparison 1, global and central amplification
The following is the comparison of the original magnification of each machine's medium focus (3 times, 3.2 times and 4.3 times), the perspective of low magnification and the picture details of high magnification ↓
"Three times" contrast 2, global, central and lower central magnification
"Three times" comparison 3, global and central amplification
"Three times" contrast 4, global and central amplification
"Three times" comparison 5, global and central amplification
"Three times" compared to 6, the whole, the center and the top of the center are magnified
Long focus: 5/6x, 10x, 20x, 30x contrast
Here it happens that they are all equivalent 0.7 μ m, 1/2.51 sensors (the OV64B of X100 Pro intercepts 50 million pixels in the center).
Samsung, Xiaomi and OPPO all use IMX858 analogs, while the OV64B used by vivo is not a 2x2 OCL sensor. Although its magnification is low, the subsequent digital zoom is more advantageous.
"5x" contrast 1, global and central amplification
"10 times" contrast 1, global and central amplification
"30x" vs. 1, global and central amplification (Xiaomi 14 Ultra above 30x may trigger the AIGC algorithm, that is, "AI Paint", which should be effective here)
"5x" contrast 2, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 3, global and central amplification
(In this scene, Xiaomi 14 Ultra took 14 photos in 12 seconds, none of which were successfully focused)
"10 times" contrast 3, global and central amplification
"5x" contrast 3, global and central amplification
"5x" contrast 4, global and central amplification
"5x" vs. 6, global and central amplification
"10 times" contrast 6, global and central amplification
(Xiaomi 14 Ultra has the same focusing/anti shaking problem as the previous one again, and more than 10 pieces are pasted. But after more than 5 times, the film rate returns to normal ↓, and it is not sure where the bug is.)
"20x" vs. 6, central magnification
"10 times" contrast 7, global and central amplification
"10 times" contrast 8, global and central amplification
"30x" vs. 8, central magnification
"10 times" contrast 9, global and central amplification
"30x" vs. 8, central magnification
"10 times" compared to 10, the lower side of the center is enlarged
"10X" vs. 10, central magnification
"10 times" contrast 11, global and central amplification
"30x" vs. 11, central magnification
"10 times" contrast 12, global and central amplification
"30x" vs. 12, central magnification
"30 times" compared to 13, the whole, the top of the center and the center are magnified (Xiaomi has a powerful AIGC, although the font is still unrecognizable, it is really impressive)
Summary and ranking
4 Photography has become the standard configuration of the image flagship, but the focal section settings of each company are different, which leads to different ranking ratings for users with different focal points.
As "the most commonly used 2 to 3 times telephoto+occasionally far sighted Maoist party", Ben ranked them as follows—— OPPO Find X7 Ultra>Xiaomi 14 Ultra>vivo X100 Pro>Galaxy S24 Ultra.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra hardware specifications are there, especially after price reduction, it is stronger:
After OTA, as long as the light is not dim, it can be triggered at 6 times of telephoto, but the aperture of F4.3 is too small, and the light will be inverted by vivo X100 Pro if it is slightly dim. However, its high rate of film formation is high, and the algorithm survival rate is the lowest among several sets. It is suitable for concert telescopes, and its effect will be better than Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Samsung S24 Ultra.
It is a pity that the camera with the strongest ultra wide angle hardware and the smaller field of view still loses in the algorithm.
Although the details and 2x zoom of the main camera are a little weak, this 2.7x IMX890 telephoto is still the strongest telephoto between 2.7x and 3x.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra It is a typical image bucket machine, the Huawei route of small bottom sensor+super aperture lens:
The most surprising thing is that this non cutting 3.2 times F1.8 telephoto, when the light is good, the details are better than OPPO and Samsung's mid-range focus, only 4.3 times lower than vivo, and it can also bite the Find X7 Ultra when the light is poor.
The super wide angle is commendable, has the biggest vision, and the detail performance is also OK. The main camera tends to press the dark part. Occasionally, the saturation of the dark part is low, and the highlight suppression is weak.
The main weakness comes from the 5x telephoto, the film rate is obviously low, the "interlacing" is serious when shooting at high frequency, and the detail performance is also weak, If there is no bug, it may be that our machine has a hardware problem 。
v ivo X100 Pro：
It is still an invincible highlight suppression. Surprisingly, it uses the weakest JN1+small angle lens to get the strongest picture details (sacrificing the perspective).
The white balance of the main camera occasionally drifts. The pictures at ultra-high magnification are sandwiched and compressed violently, but the core weakness is still that there is no triple focal length. The main shot jumps to 4.3 times directly, and there is no multi shot fusion algorithm, which is equivalent to the strategy of giving up the use of 2 to 4.3 times more frequently, which is too bad.
Although the X100 Ultra may be equivalent to 85mm, about 3.7 times the 200 million pixel telephoto, its weakness will still be similar to that of the X100 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra:
The provincial flow is the tears of star fans. This year's progress is weak (the concert scene has also regressed). The sharpening force is lighter than that of the previous generation, the contrast is not so high, there are more dark details, and highlight suppression is also added.
In fact, the main camera and the 5x telephoto are not far apart, but the 3x telephoto is too perfunctory. The light is slightly weaker, so the noise does not care about the eyes of others. It even dares to cut the image with the 3x telephoto of IMX989, playing an extremely stable role, reaching the advanced level in 2019.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
