OPPO Reno10 Pro+was released on May 24. Snapdragon 8+, 1.5K curved screen, 4700mAh+100W fast charging, and its core selling point is the flagship 6400W 3 times OV64B periscope telephoto, and its weight is only 194g. It claims to be the lightest periscope telephoto phone this year.
The thin and light models are equipped with a leapfrog telephoto. The positioning of OPPO Reno10 Pro+is very tricky, but it is really in the minds of many users, Let's see how different it is from the Find X6/X6 Pro telephoto!
Specifications
The 3GHz version of Snapdragon 8+has Mariana X self developed NPU.
Find The same model of X6 has a 6.74 inch 120Hz central perforated curved screen, 2772x1240450ppi, and a peak brightness of 1400 nits.
Front 3200W, Sony IMX709, F2.4
Main camera 5000W, Sony IMX890, 1 μ m. 1/1.56 inch, F1.8+OIS
Ultra wide angle 800W, Sony IMX355, 1/4 inch, F2.2
6400W triple periscope telephoto, OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 inch, F2.5, suspended prism OIS
4700mAh battery+100W fast charge+SUPERCOOEC S power management chip. There is infrared+NFC+X-axis motor+double lift.
There are three colors: brilliant gold, twilight purple and moon sea black, plastic middle frame, 8.28mm, 194g
OPPO Reno10 Pro+16+256 version 3899 yuan, 16+512 version 4299 yuan
appearance
As long as you see OPPO/Yijia/Real My 100W fast charging, you know it's an old friend VCBAJACH.
11V 9.1A violent high current (it must be mentioned every time: remember to keep this super standard line). The magic change A port only has OPPO private protocol, which is not compatible with PD/PPS fast charging. The material is good, but the bird food is not very environmentally friendly.
Normal light scene without soft light (shot by Find X6 Pro) ↓
OPPO Reno10 Pro+is available in three colors: brilliant gold (main color), twilight purple and moonlight black, 8.28mm, 194g.
This size/weight curved screen machine is difficult to feel bad. It has AG glass lines like silk screen, and feels novel and comfortable.
The plastic middle frame has an overall bright surface, which could have been fake, but the bottom is specially made of frosted.
There are a lot of considerations about the appearance of blinking blinking. If the periscope reflects different colors, it still thinks that the lens is the same glass (there are serrated parts like Find X6 Pro in the periscope telephoto to reduce glare). If it is a metal middle frame, it will kill you. It's a pity.
OPPO Reno10 Pro+has infrared+NFC+short focus optical fingerprint+X-axis motor (familiar 0809 specification, OK strength, average tightness)+dual speakers (the upper speaker volume is low, but the overall volume and sound quality are good).
photograph
For the camera part of OPPO Reno10 Pro+, there is a Mariana X self developed NPU, whose core advantage is that it is obviously super class triple focal length:
Front 3200W, Sony IMX709, F2.4
Main camera 5000W, Sony IMX890, 1 μ m. 1/1.56 inch, F1.8+OIS
Ultra wide angle 800W, Sony IMX355, 1/4 inch, F2.2
Triple periscope, 6400W, OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 ", F2.5, 4P lens, suspended prism OIS
In contrast, Vivo X90 Pro, known as flagship Kakashi+ , and Huawei P50 Pro (Mate 50 Pro has more RYYB). Their periscope telephoto is 3.5 times 6400W, OV64B, 0.7 μ m，1/2"，F3.5，OIS，90mm。
OPPO Reno10 Pro+ The focal length of the telephoto is shorter, but the aperture increases to F2.5, which makes friends cry 。
The objects of this photo comparison include:
iQOO Neo8 Pro： Main camera 5000W, IMX866 VCS, RGBW, 1 μ m. 1/1.49 ", F1.88+OIS. Ultra wide angle 800W 1.12 μ m. With vivo V1+
Find X6 Pro： 1-inch IMX989 main camera, 2.7x telephoto IMX890 (1/1.56 ", 1 μ m) +F2.6, IMX890 Ultra Wide Angle
Some guest appearances of Xiaomi 13 Ultra: 1-inch IMX989 main camera, 3.2x F1.8 IMX858 telephoto (1/2.51 ", 0.7 μ m. Physical 2.6 times), 5 times IMX858 telephoto, and IMX858 ultra wide angle.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification
Subjective contrast
Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 2, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 7, global and central amplification
Telephoto contrast
The physical output of Find X6 Pro is 2.7 times, and that of Xiaomi 13 Ultra is 2.6 times (when it is 6 times, it is 5 times the telephoto cutting). Both of them are 1200W output, but OPPO Reno10 Pro+is 3 times the physical output and 1600W output
PS： Xiaomi 13 Ultra exported samples through mutual transmission, and the exif message was erased by mistake. However, it was found too late, and the proof with exif has been deleted, so we have to make do with it (the data has not been backed up, so sooner or later two lines of tears will come)
"Three times" comparison 1, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 1, global and central amplification
"Three times" contrast 2, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 2, global and central amplification
"Three times" comparison 3, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 3, global and central amplification
"Three times" contrast 4, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 4, global and central amplification
"Three times" comparison 5, global and central amplification
"6 times" contrast 5, global and central amplification
"Three times" contrast 6, global and central amplification
"Three times" contrast 6, global and central amplification
(The above is the light scene, and OPPO Reno10 Pro+can also call the telephoto. In the following weak light scene, OPPO Reno10 Pro+cannot trigger the telephoto)
"6X" vs. 6 , global and central amplification
(Above is the light scene, OPPO Reno10 Pro+ It can also call the telephoto. In the following weak light scene, OPPO Reno10 Pro+cannot trigger telephoto)
"Three times" contrast 7, global and central amplification (both are weak light scenes, OPPO Reno10 Pro+cannot trigger telephoto)
"6x" vs. 7 , global and central magnification (both are weak light scenes, OPPO Reno10 Pro+cannot trigger telephoto)
"6X" vs. 8 , central magnification (all are weak light scenes, OPPO Reno10 Pro+cannot trigger telephoto)
The photo experience and imaging style of OPPO Reno10 Pro+are very similar to those of the Find X6 Pro. It is easy to be sandwiched after taking several pictures in succession (there is an unprocessed sample output). Like the flagship in 2023, OPPO Reno10 Pro+also likes to press the dark part.
Main camera The iQOO Neo8 Pro is slightly weaker than the iQOO Neo8 Pro with stronger hardware. The white balance accuracy of the extremely weak light scene is average, and the rest is commendable (the gap between the IMX989 and the IMX989 is needless to say. Basically, the shutter/multi frame synthesis duration of all scenes of the IMX989 is only half of that of the IMX890... This is the difference between capturing ability and non capturing ability).
Strategically abandoned Super wide-angle Very weak (the automatic night view is OK, the automatic HDR kneels down, and there is a clear gap with friends) (although many people don't care about super wide angle at all)
OPPO Reno10 Pro+ The 6400W triple focus OV64B is really strong In the daytime, the light scene can also win a small victory (after all, the number of focal segments and pixels is higher) by pressing three times the friction between Xiaomi 13 Ultra and Find X6 Pro.
However, the 6-fold algorithm of superimposed digital zoom has a low chip rate and seems unable to exert its full power. It can win the Find X6 Pro, but it cannot win the 5-fold digital cutting with Xiaomi 13 Ultra.
its The nearest focusing distance is 25m-30cm , slightly farther than the Find X6 Pro, but it's also very comfortable to shoot near objects.
Unfortunately, although the aperture is 3.5 times larger than the X90 Pro+'s telephoto, the telephoto cannot be triggered for weak light and weak light scenes (Find X6 Pro can call the telephoto as usual even under extremely weak light, and your brother is still your brother).
Objective test: screen&performance&heating&endurance&charging
PS: Analysis and conclusion at the end
(screen test)
(Performance test: the three colors represent CPU, GPU, and flash memory read/write performance respectively. The higher the score, the better (the color bar represents the ratio of this test to the best score, the longer the better)
(Test environment: room temperature 25.6 degrees, 200 nit screen brightness)
(In the same environment, after 20 minutes of Peace Elite HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing)
(Endurance test: 200 nit screen brightness, test power range 30% to 80%. Including 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surfing, a total of 2.5 hours)
(Charging power curve)
(Comparison of charging nodes)
Screen: OPPO Reno10 Pro+ It is equipped with a 6.74-inch 120Hz central perforated curved screen of the same model of Find X6, 2772x1240450ppi, 1100 nits globally, and 1400 nits peak brightness. The default touch sampling rate is 120Hz, and the maximum is 240Hz.
By default, 360Hz PWM dimming, 1440Hz high-frequency PWM dimming is still in the developer's option, and 90 nits is switched around (a little lower than half of the brightness slider), so the low brightness is better than the medium brightness eye protection # ￥% @ # ￥%&￥%&&#
The brightness and uniformity are similar to the 1.5K screen of Yijia Ace 2, The color accuracy is not very high, but it performs normally.
Performance: My old friend's 3GHz version of Snapdragon 8+, LPDDR5+UFS 3.1. Performance release and scheduling are unexpectedly positive , which is better than the Redmi K60 of the same SoC.
thermal stability Generally, the temperature control line is about 48 degrees, which is more bold than the 45 degrees of ordinary mobile phones. The maximum temperature of 3DMark toaster is 48.5 ℃, and the stability of 3DMark Wild Life Ulimited and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Ulimited tests are both below 60%. The moderate and light peace elites are responsible for the highest temperature of 39.9 degrees. Normal performance of Snapdragon 8+.
Average endurance （ 4700mAh battery is equipped with 1.5K screen Snapdragon 8+, and SUPERCOOEC S power management chip). One year is OK, but it will be normal in 2023 when Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Snapdragon 8+run everywhere. Because of the 1.5K screen and more active scheduling, the endurance is weaker than the Reno9+with the same SoC but 1080P+screen, and is equal to the Reno8 Pro+with Tianji 8100.
charge: The slightly conservative Green Factory 100W fast charging is more active than the Find X6 Pro and more conservative than the True Self series. The peak value is 80.5W, and it takes 29 minutes to fully charge.
Summary
OPPO Reno10 Pro+'s 1.5K screen, Snapdragon 8+performance, and 100W fast charge are all functioning normally, and the scheduling is even a bit active, resulting in a slightly weaker endurance among peers.
The main camera is the IMX890 in the style of Find X6 Pro, which is at the middle level of the same level. Ultra wide angle is obviously weak (especially HDR needs to be improved by OTA).
And this one Triple telephoto (rounded to the same level as the X90 Pro+telephoto), there is really no competition in the same level The light scene can also be called, and the focusing distance of less than 30cm is also suitable for shooting objects/near objects. It is a pity that its weak light call is not even as active as the X90 Pro+with smaller aperture. If you can polish the algorithm again, you can kill it directly, but it depends on the engineers of the green factory.
On second thought, this is the OV64B, three times 6400W, six times 1600W, and then cut at 1200W, but it is also an eight times mirror... The magnification itself crushes the physical 2.7 times of the Find X6 Pro, and the physical 2.6 times of the Xiaomi 13 Ultra medium focus... Even though the highest magnification is not up to the level of the previous Reno10 zoom version, OPPO Reno10 Pro+can cover the lower focus section, and has better versatility.
Finally, let's check the price of the same level telephoto at the nearby price:
OPPO Find X6 It is 2.7 times the F2.6 IMX890 of the same model as the Find X6 Pro, Tianji 9200, 12+256 version, 4499 yuan, 16+512 version, 4999 yuan (the main camera of the Find X6 is not better than the Reno10 Pro+, but the telephoto is not better than the Find X6 Pro. Unless it is the most demanding portrait shooting, the telephoto of the OPPO Reno10 Pro+is more cost-effective).
Nubia Z50 Ultra 6400W periscope telephoto with focal section shorter than X90 Pro+/Huawei P50 Pro (90mm), OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 ", equivalent to 85mm+OIS. Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, 8+256 version, 3999 yuan, 12+256 version, 4299 yuan, 12+512 version, 4699 yuan, 16+1T version, 5999 yuan.
Huawei P60 There is a 12 million pixel RYYB 5 times periscope telephoto, F3. 4+OIS, and 48 million pixel RYYB main camera, with F1.4 to F4 10 variable aperture+OIS (Snapdragon 8+4G, 8+128 version 4488 yuan, 8+256 version 4988 yuan, 8+512 version 5988 yuan).
Glory Magic5 Pro There is a 5000W 3.5x telephoto, F3.0+OIS, supporting 30cm focusing (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, 8+256 version 5199 yuan, 12+256 version 5699 yuan, 16+512 version 6199 yuan, 16+512 version 6699 yuan)
Sony Xperia 1 V 1200W, 1 μ m. 1/3.5 ", 85 to 125mm continuous optical zoom+OIS, F2.3 to F2.8 (12+256 version 8999 yuan, 12+256 version 9799 yuan)
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
