OPPO Find X6 Pro was released on March 21. It has the highest brightness mobile phone screen, the largest sensor (telephoto, ultra wide-angle, and the largest main camera), and others like Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, 100W fast charge+50W wireless charge, IP68, USB 3.1 interface, infrared, etc. Needless to say. Without attribution, Find X6 Pro is the best mobile phone in OPPO history.
After using it as the main engine for nearly a month, now we will hand in our homework.
Comparison pictures of netizens ↑
Unified IMX858 "pricing": Find X6 Pro is 522%+2x203%=928%, Xiaomi 13 Ultra is 522%+3x100%=822%
Using a larger aperture can indeed make up for the gap in light penetration, but Teng Fei is right: dark light sees light penetration, and good light still depends on size. Some laws of physics cannot be circumvented.
Appearance and accessories
The charging head is an old friend of Green Factory, a VCBAJACH with 11V 9.1A peak value of 100W, a Magai port A, 10A wire, and Jinhu OEM. Incompatible with PD/PPS, unable to charge the notebook, not very environmentally friendly. Basically, the 100W fast charger of the Green Factory series (OPPO, OnePlus, True Self) is all this fast charger.
The original shell is hard, plain leather, without side edges, and has good workmanship and feel.
The flying spring green/cloud ink black ↓ of AG glass and the desert silver moon ↓, the phone case can be interchanged by NTR, because the phone has a thickness difference of 0.4mm, and the tightness is slightly different, but it does not matter.
Cloud Ink Black ↑ and Desert Silver Moon ↑
Just opened the box, desert silver moon and cloud ink black, with film 220.5g and 221.9g respectively, 1.4g difference.
The Find X6 Pro is indeed the lightest in the current photography flagship. The Desert Silver Moon version is 5g lighter than X90 Pro+, 9g lighter than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, 15g lighter than S23 Ultra, and 24g lighter than iPhone 14 Pro Max
Four curved glass, with obvious radians on the upper and lower parts of the screen, but avoiding the display area (incompatible factory film and screen radians ↑)
Find X6 Pro has the largest camera matrix, which is slightly smaller than the cup hole on high-speed rail/aircraft ↑
Find X5 Pro, Find X6 Pro Cloud Ink Black, Find X6 Pro Desert Silver Moon, vivo X90 Pro ↑
Among the three Find X6 Pro colors, the desert silver moon of "plain leather back cover+frosted middle frame+dial camera decoration ring" has a completely different visual perception and feel from the "AG glass+bright surface middle frame+brushed metal camera decoration ring" Feiquan green/cloud ink black, and the desert silver moon's body feeling will be a level lighter.
Color recommendation Don't ask, ask is the desert silver moon, followed by cloud and ink black, and the flying spring green row is the last. Desert Silver Moon is the soul color of Find X6 Pro, just like Populus euphratica for Mate 40 Pro and Huaxia Red for X90 Pro+in autumn (although I chose black). Black and desert silver moon are two extremes. The former is not intended to be noticed, and the latter is "look at it quickly". The green in the middle is a bit awkward.
Huge camera circle As a result, the feel of the Find X6 Pro bare metal machine is ordinary. Because the owner of Shenzhen Bay No.1, who has 180 per capita, will have his index finger tilted by the camera, and the camera circle is too rich, it is recommended to wear a thin mobile phone case that can cover the camera matrix to improve the feel.
Wireless charging coil The position of is normal. It doesn't move down like Xiaomi 10 Ultra. It is just that the camera ring is too large, and if it is placed on a non Find X6 Pro dedicated wireless charger, the phone will be jacked up and the power output will be affected.
External release: Normal flagship level, huge volume.
Vibration: 0815 The X-axis motor performs OK, rebounds tightly and has a strong force. I even have to manually adjust the force.
Fingerprint: The speed and recognition rate of fingerprint under the ultra-thin screen at high position are OK. Even though the green factory system is still unable to directly click to unlock when the screen is off (you have to shake your phone or double-click the screen until the fingerprint pattern lights up).
Objective data: screen&performance&endurance&charging
Find X6 Pro Cloud Ink ↑ and Desert Silver Moon ↑
Professional mode sRGB color standard ↑
On April 17, Find X6 Pro screen test data ↑
The Find X6 Pro is 6.82 inch 120Hz, 3168x1440, Samsung E6 middle perforated LTPO double curvature screen, gorilla Victus 2 glass, 1440Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, 1500 nit full screen brightness, 240Hz touch sampling rate, 2500 nit local peak, and 1500 nit full screen peak brightness.
The average color deviation of the actual professional mode is 1, the maximum is 2.7, and the flow saving is The color accuracy of the top flagship.
The Find X6 Pro screen has many very special points:
When we first got the Find X6 Pro in March, its full white excitation brightness was very exaggerated, up to 1530 nits, higher than the official standard value, and it killed all models in the history of our database. However, on April 18, the deadline, after two OTAs, its default natural mode (corresponding to the adaptive mode of other manufacturers) The peak value of all white excitation was pressed to 1230 nits. Although it was still high, it was conservative.
The default natural mode, on the contrary, corresponds to the sRGB color gamut, which will automatically switch when encountering P3 content. The logic is contrary to the flamboyant style of other Android manufacturers. But in truth, this is a good civilization.
The highest brightness is the gorgeous mode. The manual full white brightness is 766 nits, and the local brightness is 1093 nits. At this time, the four corner brightness is 773/776/773/771 nits, The difference is 10 nits, and the evenness is good (The default natural mode full white brightness is 721 nits)
After 1440Hz high-frequency PWM dimming is enabled, it will change from full brightness 720Hz to full brightness 1440Hz dimming (other manufacturers use high brightness DC, or like other OPPO models, high brightness maintains low-frequency PWM). The full brightness stroboscopic will be much lower, and no obvious color and uniformity changes are found. Zhuo! Close your eyes and open! (After many years, OPPO flagship finally returned to the A-level evaluation of diced eggs, and teacher Navis also gave a good evaluation of eye protection)
The visual impression is "transparent", because the brightness is extremely high.
In addition to the fact that the Samsung E6 screen still tends to be blue-green at a large angle, and the system's automatic brightness always tends to be higher (the automatic brightness is higher), this screen has almost no flaws: it is In today's Samsung E6 LTPO screen, there is no one with the highest brightness, the best color accuracy and the best eye protection.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, LPDDR5x memory+UFS 4.0 flash memory, equipped with 3934mm ² stainless steel VC soaking plate (normal flagship size).
Not to mention the performance. The actual performance is similar to that of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 on the same platform, but the flash memory performance is unexpectedly strong. Even with the 256GB version, its write and random read/write performance is still better than that of the same gate plus 11 with larger capacity.
The 5000mAh battery of Find X6 Pro, 200 nit screen brightness, after 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" (HDR high-definition+limit frames+anti aliasing), 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surfing, a total of 2.5 hours of endurance test, the remaining power is 78%, which is the normal level of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 model.
Find X6 Pro In the endurance test, the endurance is OK, but in actual use, the endurance is weaker than other Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 models We guess that the main reason is that the automatic brightness set by OPPO is on the high side, and the excitation brightness of the screen itself is higher than that of friends (the power consumption will also be higher).
In addition, the power consumption of the Find X6 Pro is also significantly high. During the three hour night shot, the Samsung S23U and Xiaomi 12SU both consumed about 20% power (1143 and 1201 photos respectively), the vivo X90 Pro+consumed 30% power (1310 photos), and OPPO consumed more than 40% power (1136 photos, almost no power to go home).
However, screen brightness and photographing are core needs, and I support the setting of the current sacrifice point endurance: After all, the electricity can be recharged, but if the screen and photos I bought with extra money can't be full of blood, what else should I buy Find X6 Pro?
The 100W fast charge is equipped with 5000mAh dual cell, which is nothing special. It can be fully charged for 33 minutes, which is stronger than the flagship of the 80W fast charge, and is significantly different from the 120W fast charge.
system
After using telephoto and portrait mode, I changed the main machine to Find X6 Pro despite the strong opposition of iQOO 11. For the first time in many years, I have taken the mobile phone of the Green Factory as the main engine.
I used to be: I couldn't change my desktop, my mobile phone couldn't change my root, and I couldn't maintain my life.
Now I: What can't stand for this long coke?
For most normal users, ColorOS is quite comfortable, and its core advantage is naturally smoothness. Flagships of other manufacturers can wipe oil on the soles of their feet as quickly as Dove, but ColorOS can wipe oil on the soles of their feet as quickly as Dove, In addition, the background of the locked APP is extremely alive (except for the lack of system power consumption, multiple opening function restrictions, low desktop icon density, low multitasking interface display density and inability to directly jump to the application management page, few desktop components, Wi Fi ADB is always automatically turned off, etc., the needs of some players are not met).
But for this 2.7 times IMX890, I started a long journey of running in ColorOS. It reminds me of the old adage "MIUI/One UI after half a lifetime". The core tribulations are three:
The first problem encountered is that ColorOS does not allow desktop changes. After uninstalling the system desktop with ADB, the multitasking interface/button, super power saving mode, small window call out and other functions are lost. Finally, you can only use the Tasker detection home key to automatically jump to the nova desktop, and cooperate with everywhere's side sliding to jump to nova and other curve schemes.
The second problem is that ColorOS can only lock 5 APPs in the background (WeChat/QQ and other communication types are not limited), while I usually need to stay in the background/open barrier free services for more than 13 apps. As a result, the "Battery - More Settings - Sleep Standby Optimization" can only be turned off painfully, and sometimes continuous photographing/video recording will kill some APPs in the background and reopen barrier free services.
The third problem is ColorOS's great thirst for memory In the 12GB memory version, after taking a few photos, the background will be cleaned up crazily (it is useless to expand the memory to 8GB). If Shoujian removes the default WeChat background lock, on a 12GB memory mobile phone, you can still experience the sour life of iPhone that "take a few photos and WeChat will be overloaded". Do you believe it? Want to clear the background? Just take photos.
At this time, a batch of apps that use barrier free services and have no place to add background locks will hang up again, and can only be improved with ADB solutions such as "adb shell dumpsys device idle whitelist", which cannot be cured temporarily (Gan! As long as the background lock restrictions of five apps are removed, nothing will happen). But this problem is the easiest for me to solve. Just grab Cui Ye's Desert Silver Moon with 16GB memory 。
photograph
We have previously made a horizontal review including 50 scenes, more than 4600 samples taken in total, and nearly 200 comparison pictures retained: "Flagship Duel, OPPO Find X6 Pro, vivo X90 Pro+, Samsung S23 Ultra, Xiaomi 12S Ultra Photography Horizontal Review" //fanlma.cn/news/202304/lvtoLzx5f1AgUA6C.html Comparison with portrait: OPPO Find X6 Pro vs. vivo X90 Pro+, Samsung S23 Ultra, Xiaomi 12S Ultra //fanlma.cn/news/202304/lDRU5hJODCFW7zcP.html The following is an excerpt of some samples.
PS： In order to easily see the difference on various platforms, including WeChat (the pictures of Android WeChat will be compressed to 1080x925 pixels), the magnification of the central part of the sample is increased to 500%, which should It is not necessary to click on the so-called "big picture" of WeChat to get high and low 。
PSS： Xiaomi uses Leica Vivid mode throughout the journey, and all other models are in automatic mode. All focus points are in the center of the picture, and all proofs are arranged according to global+central magnification.
PSS： All the samples this time are uploaded to the online disk. Interested readers can download them and count their hair. The link is: , extraction code: igao
The specific specifications will not be repeated. In addition to the 1-inch IMX989, the Find X6 Pro has the most powerful ultra wide angle and medium and long focus specifications today, the vivo X90 Pro+has medium and long focus coordination, and the "telescope manufacturer" Samsung has the only 3 times+10 times long focus and 200 million pixels of main camera in this generation. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra, who came to run with him, is an older generation after all, and the auxiliary photography can only be called commendable now. The main weakness is the focal gap between 1 and 5 times (3 times up has multi camera fusion, but the lighting scene with light weakness is not available).
Anti glare performance
Vivo's anti glare control and OPPO/Xiaomi are at two extremes (when encountering bright light sources such as traffic lights, you can even see the number of seconds in the glare reflected into the sky, and the iPhone has to give them three minutes...). Samsung has a weak vivo gear, but at least it is not successful.
Main camera 1, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle 1, global and central amplification
Long focus contrast (3x, 3.5x, 5x and 10x)
The situation in Changjiao is quite chaotic. This time, it is mainly a comparison of 3 times (OPPO home court) and 3.5 times (vivo home court):
OPPO Find X6 Pro It is 2.7 times of IMX890 F2.6 (1/1.56 ", 1 μ m)
vivo X90 Pro+ It is IMX758 (1/2.51 ", 0.7 μ m) with 2 times of F1.6+OV64B (1/2", 0.7 μ m) with 3.5 times of F3.5
Samsung S23 Ultra Is 3 times F2.4 and 10 times F4.9 IMX754 (1/3.52 ", 1.12 μ m)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra 5 times of F4.1 IMX598 (1/2 ", 0.8 μ m)
"3x zoom" 1
"3.5x zoom" 1
"5x zoom" 1
"10x zoom" 1. Encounter a large number of solid text scenes, Find X6 Pro and vivo X90 Pro+are oil paintings
"3x zoom" 7
"3x zoom" 7, central magnification
"3.5x zoom" contrast 7
"5x zoom" contrast 7
Comparison with Samsung 10x zoom
"3x zoom" 4
"3.5x zoom" 4
"5x zoom" 4
"5x zoom" 8, low light
"5x zoom" 9, low light
"3.5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"3.5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"3.5x zoom" 8, extremely weak light, Find X6 Pro's telephoto can also be triggered (extremely outrageous)
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle 1
Ultra Wide Angle 2
Ultra wide angle 5
Ultra wide angle 6
Ultra wide angle 8
Ultra wide angle 10
Ultra wide angle 11
High pixel mode contrast
Because the sub camera of Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra does not have a high pixel mode, let's first look at the domestic Sanxiong ↓
3.5 times 64 million pixels, 2.7 times 50 million pixels and 5 times 48 million pixels respectively ↓
Long focus high pixel mode contrast 1
Main camera high pixel mode 1
Zoom in in the main high pixel mode 1 (Samsung is in the 200 million pixel mode here) (Samsung is worthy of being a "telescope manufacturer", with first-class gross counting effect)
Scene 2, zoom in in the main high pixel mode (Samsung is in the 200 million pixel mode here)
Indoor light, main high pixel mode 3
Indoor light, main shooting high pixel mode 3, central magnification
Subjective contrast
IMX989 vs Samsung HP2, The core difference of the three domestic IMX989 is aperture and lens coating.
Main camera 1
Zoom in of main camera 1
Main camera 1, upper part of the center, high-frequency detail amplification ("ringing phenomenon" occurs to varying degrees)
Main camera 1, lower right corner edge enlarged.
The image quality of Xiaomi 12S Ultra is obviously reduced at the edge, and the Find X6 Pro is slightly better, vivo The X90 Pro+is better, and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra with a "small bottom" performs best here.
Main camera 3, global and central amplification
Main camera 5, global and central amplification
Main camera 6, global and central amplification
Main camera 7, global and central amplification
Main camera 13, global and central amplification
Main shot 14 (pay attention to highlight suppression)
Main camera 15
Main camera 17, global and central amplification
Main camera 21, weak light
Main camera 22, extremely weak light, global and central amplification
Main camera 23, extremely weak light, global and central amplification
Comparison of main portrait
In addition to the Xiaomi 12S Ultra (1 and 2 times) in the main portrait mode, OPPO (3 times), vivo (2 and 3.5 times) and Samsung (3 times) all use medium and long focus. The core of portrait shooting is floating Bright girlfriend/wife Bottom sensor, virtualization and color mixing.
Global comparison of main portrait 1
Main portrait 1, zoom in at the center (pay attention to the blurring of the characters' edges)
Global comparison of main portrait 2 (Xiaomi has no portrait mode)
Main portrait 2, zoom in at the center (pay attention to the blurring of the characters' edges)
Long focus portrait contrast
Long focus portrait 1, global contrast (here vivo is 3.5x long focus)
Long focus portrait 1, central magnification (vivo here is 3.5x long focus)
The distance of this scene is too close for vivo X90 Pro+, resulting in a big head shot. However, due to the weak ambient light, the details of the Find X6 Pro, which is 2.7 times the size of the outsole, are stronger, and the figure edge cutting of the latter is also more radical.
Long focus portrait 3, global contrast (here vivo is 3.5 times long focus)
Long focus portrait 3, central magnification (vivo here is 3.5x long focus)
Long focus "portrait", global contrast (here vivo is 3.5 times long focus)
Long focus portrait 3, central magnification (vivo here is 3.5x long focus)
Photo summary
If we were to rank, Find X6 Pro and vivo X90 Pro+would rank in the top two:
OPPO Find X6 Pro : The main problem is that the high light pressure system is obviously weaker than that of friends and businesses, and the "sandwich" of continuous shooting is serious, and there is often no time to complete the processing of samples (if there is a complete algorithm processing, it will deliberately lower the dark part+apply more forcefully. If there is a sandwich, there will be a sense of both HDR vision similar to the Meizu's violent pulling of the dark part), the main camera and the ultra wide angle have obvious ghost glare comparable to the iPhone Interpolated high pixel mode High pixel mode is lonely, Hasu/professional mode is more "monosodium glutamate", when encountering glass, the focus clearly hesitates, and the power consumption for taking photos is high.
But its The advantages are also very strong , the strongest ultra wide angle, strongest medium and long focus (the first one can be called in extremely weak light, and it has been used more frequently than the main focus in the past month), extremely easy to use and comfortable portrait mode (the real "portrait monster", even I like to use it. The detail performance can be compared with that of the Vivo X90 Pro+'s 3.5x F3.5x OV64B, leaving the Samsung S23 Ultra's small bottom, 3x long focal length, and turning). The imaging style that pursues contrast is easy to produce, relatively close to the naked eye's light metering, and the discrimination of the default mode is good.
Finally, there is today's first mobile preview effect. No matter what kind of mobile phone photos, 30% points can be added when viewed on the 2500 nit peak screen. In addition to OPPO's ProXDR effect, when watching the camera, we thought OPPO would be invincible until we were led to the same device to watch it (although we really think it is comprehensive first now).
Find X6 Pro suddenly accelerated OTA speed in April, Love to play computer games On April 10 and 13, when taking photos and making horizontal comments, the version was 122. On April 16, the version 123 was updated. At the end of April, there will be a new version. It is said that the sharpening strength will be adjusted, Later, wait for Xiaomi 13 Ultra to make a comparison.
vivo X90 Pro+： The main problems are the photographic experience, the weak 2-3.5-fold focal length, the degree of darkness brightening that will be criticized this year, the night vision meter, and the ultra wide angle discrimination affected by violent HDR.
The core advantages are the exaggerated capture efficiency (although the shooting experience is average), the quality of the lens that is still in the sky (glare/ghost control against the sky), the highlight suppression of the sky, the balanced main shooting (the position of the strongest IMX989 is still stable), the 2x telephoto and 3.5x telephoto (10 times of gross counting effect, and 5 times of Xiaomi's optics).
When shooting continuously in dim light, the shutter will be suspended from time to time, and the viewfinder will occasionally jam. However, in fact, only vivo X90 Pro+can fully respond to all shutter clicks (including night view/high pixel mode), and almost never "sandwiched". Every sample is completely processed and then output. It's incredible how many times you test it.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: It does not have such obvious shortcomings as domestic manufacturers, but its long board is not prominent enough. It stresses balance and extremely weak light intensity is exaggerated. The key word is discrimination. Samsung is really a manufacturer of "telescopes". Although the noise is not smeared cleanly, it makes the high pixel mode of the main camera and the discrimination of the two telephotos superior. At present, there is no match for the 10 times or more focal length.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra: The advantage is more restrained sharpening than that of friends and businesses. The picture is relatively natural. Leica's vivid mode is really vivid and pleasing (although only its white balance is floating). The night scene atmosphere is good, easy to form films and attract eyeballs. The weakness is that the main shooting night scene discrimination is weak, the super wide angle is weak, the huge focal section gap before 5 times, and the portrait mode is weak, but after all, it is not so much required for old comrades to participate in the guest show.
summary
Before the evaluation, Find X6 Pro was "the flagship image with the highest brightness mobile phone screen and the largest sensor (the largest telephoto, ultra wide-angle and main camera)". After evaluation, there are more Find X6 Pro“ The most eye protecting screen in the flagship of the Green Factory, the most comprehensive screen today, the most powerful medium and long focus, and the most powerful portrait mode (this band "one") ”The title of.
Its main weakness is The endurance is weak in the flagship of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and the restrictions of ColorOS on us 。
Although OPPO is still modifying the imaging style according to user feedback, this time point is enough for me to give the Find X6 Pro a title of "human monster": it is my favorite OPPO phone this year. Because of the light of this green factory, I am green.
Yes, when Xiaomi 12S Ultra first came out, I was very sure that 12S Ultra was my god, and 12S Ultra was invincible in the world. I think I will only love 12S Ultra in my life. After all, the collection of Snapdragon 8+ IMX989、 Five times focus IMX586 in one, it's amazing. OK.
Then vivo X90 Pro+came: Yes, I think I will only love X90 Pro+in my life. After all, the blue factory has given the IMX989 a larger aperture, and the highlight suppression algorithm is too strong. The 3.5 times OV64B is within 10 times, and the IMX586 telephoto of Xiaomi is easy to capture. In addition to the ZEISS coating, it is simply invincible in the world. It is God's good.
Later, I went to the iQOO 11 nursing home in Zhiping for my little finger. Put down the obsession of mobile photography, sell all the image flagship, read some books you like, ride a bike, climb mountains, ski, drink tea and chat with some friends in the dark, and live in the present. There is no need to take photos. One day, you will find. Chicken feathers are useless! It's still TMD who needs to take photos! There is no difference between not sending a circle of friends and not going out!
As a result, what should come will always come. OPPO Find X6 Pro comes. Yes, I think I will only love Xiaomi 12S Ultra, vivo X90 Pro+and Find X6 Pro in my life. Put two IMX890s into the telephoto and ultra wide angle. Who can stand it. 2.7 times medium and long focal length camera is just good, and Find X6 Pro is really good. And 216g, the little finger looked at it and agreed to let us together.
Maybe I am a scum man.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
