The three domestic "Blue Green Orange" have their own 1-inch IMX989 image flagship. Let's take a look this time OPPO Find X6 Pro、vivo X90 Pro+、 Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra The stronger is the weaker.
The comparison included 50 scenes, more than 4600 samples were taken in total, and nearly 200 comparison pictures were retained. Even without looking at the text, it should help you clearly understand the imaging characteristics of each machine.
In order to prevent the influence of preconceptions, our conclusions are unified at the end of the article. There are a lot of photos, so please bear with it.
The core comparison is the OPPO Find X6 Pro and vivo X90 Pro+. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra appeared as the representative of the high pixel route, while the Xiaomi 12S Ultra participated as the first generation domestic 1-inch flagship representative (because the demo of Xiaomi 13 Ultra is not yet out of the street).
PS： In order to easily see the difference on various platforms, including WeChat (the pictures of Android WeChat will be compressed to 1080x925 pixels), the magnification of the central part of the sample is increased to 500%, which should It is not necessary to click on the so-called "big picture" of WeChat to get high and low 。
PSS： Xiaomi uses Leica Vivid mode throughout the journey, and all other models are in automatic mode. All focus points are in the center of the picture, and all proofs are arranged according to global+central magnification.
PSS： All the samples this time are uploaded to the online disk. Interested readers can download them and count their hair. The link is: , extraction code: igao
The specific specifications will not be repeated. In addition to the 1-inch IMX989, the Find X6 Pro has the most powerful ultra wide angle and medium and long focus specifications today, the vivo X90 Pro+has medium and long focus coordination, and the "telescope manufacturer" Samsung has the only 3 times+10 times long focus and 200 million pixels of main camera in this generation. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra, who came to run with him, is an older generation after all, and the auxiliary photography can only be called commendable now. The main weakness is the focal gap between 1 and 5 times (3 times up has multi camera fusion, but the lighting scene with light weakness is not available).
Anti glare performance
Vivo's anti glare control and OPPO/Xiaomi are at two extremes (when encountering bright light sources such as traffic lights, you can even see the number of seconds in the glare reflected into the sky, and the iPhone has to give them three minutes...). Samsung has a weak vivo gear, but at least it is not successful.
Main camera 1, global and central amplification
Main camera 2, global and central amplification
Main camera 3, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle 1, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle 2, upper left corner enlarged
3.5x "zoom" (Xiaomi here is the main focus digital zoom, and multi camera fusion cannot be used)
Long focus contrast (3x, 3.5x, 5x and 10x)
The situation in Changjiao is quite chaotic. This time, it is mainly a comparison of 3 times (OPPO home court) and 3.5 times (vivo home court):
OPPO Find X6 Pro It is 2.7 times of IMX890 F2.6 (1/1.56 ", 1 μ m)
vivo X90 Pro+ It is IMX758 (1/2.51 ", 0.7 μ m) with 2 times of F1.6+OV64B (1/2", 0.7 μ m) with 3.5 times of F3.5
Samsung S23 Ultra Is 3 times F2.4 and 10 times F4.9 IMX754 (1/3.52 ", 1.12 μ m)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra 5 times of F4.1 IMX598 (1/2 ", 0.8 μ m)
"3x zoom" 1
"3.5x zoom" 1
"5x zoom" 1
"10x zoom" 1. Encounter a large number of solid text scenes, Find X6 Pro and vivo X90 Pro+are oil paintings
Scene 2, "5x zoom" contrast ↑
Scene 2, "10x zoom" contrast ↑
"3x zoom" 7
"3x zoom" 7
"3.5x zoom" contrast 7
"5x zoom" contrast 7
Comparison with Samsung 10x zoom
"3x zoom" 2
"3.5x zoom" contrast 2
"3x zoom" 3
"3.5x zoom" 3
"3x zoom" 3, global, central, upper central zoom
"3x zoom" 4
"3x zoom" vs. "3.5x zoom" 6
"3.5x zoom" 3
"5x zoom" 3
"3.5x zoom" 4
"3.5x zoom" 5
"5x zoom" 5
"3.5x zoom" 6
"5x zoom" 7, weak light
"5x zoom" 8, low light
"5x zoom" 9, low light
"3.5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"3.5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"5x zoom" 7, local magnification of different areas near the center
"3.5x zoom" 8, extremely weak light, Find X6 Pro's telephoto can also be triggered (extremely outrageous)
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle 1
Ultra Wide Angle 2
Ultra wide angle 3
Ultra wide angle 4
Ultra wide angle 5
Ultra wide angle 6
Ultra wide angle 7
Ultra wide angle 8
Ultra Wide Angle 9
Ultra wide angle 10
Ultra wide angle 11
Ultra wide angle 12
High pixel mode contrast
Because the sub camera of Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra does not have a high pixel mode, let's first look at the domestic Sanxiong ↓
3.5 times 64 million pixels, 2.7 times 50 million pixels and 5 times 48 million pixels respectively ↓
Long focus high pixel mode contrast 1
Long focus high pixel mode contrast 2
Main camera high pixel mode 1
Enlarge the main camera in high pixel mode 1 (Samsung is in 50 million pixel mode here)（ Find X6 Pro is the only model here that uses interpolation for high pixel mode ）
Zoom in in the main high pixel mode 1 (Samsung is in the 200 million pixel mode here) (Samsung is worthy of being a "telescope manufacturer", with first-class gross counting effect)
Scene 2, zoom in in the main high pixel mode (Samsung is in the 50 million pixel mode here)
Scene 2, zoom in in the main high pixel mode (Samsung is in the 200 million pixel mode here)
Indoor light, main high pixel mode 3
Indoor light, main shooting high pixel mode 3, central magnification
Indoor light, main shooting high pixel mode 3, right central magnification
Subjective contrast
Finally, it's the main shot# ￥%@#￥%#￥……&
IMX989 vs Samsung HP2, The core difference of the three domestic IMX989 is aperture and lens coating.
Main camera 1
Zoom in of main camera 1
Main camera 1, upper part of the center, high-frequency detail amplification ("ringing phenomenon" occurs to varying degrees)
Main camera 1, lower right corner edge enlarged. The image quality of Xiaomi 12S Ultra is obviously reduced at the edge, and the Find X6 Pro is slightly better, vivo The X90 Pro+is better, and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra with a "small bottom" performs best here.
Main camera 2, global and central amplification
Main camera 3, global and central amplification
Main camera 4, global and central amplification
Main camera 5, global and central amplification
Main camera 6, global and central amplification
Main camera 7, global and central amplification
Main camera 8, global and central amplification
Main camera 9, global and central amplification
Main camera 10, global, central and near central highlight amplification
Main camera 11, global and central amplification
Main camera 12, global and central amplification
Main camera 13, global and central amplification
Main camera 14, global and central amplification (pay attention to highlight suppression)
Main camera 15, global and central amplification
Main camera 16, global and central amplification
Main camera 17, global and central amplification
Main camera 18, global and central amplification
Main camera 19, global and central amplification
Main camera 20, global and central amplification
Main camera 21, weak light, global and central amplification
Main camera 22, extremely weak light, global and central amplification
Main camera 23, extremely weak light, global and central amplification
Main camera 24, extremely weak light, global and central amplification
summary
If we were to rank, Find X6 Pro and vivo X90 Pro+would rank in the top two:
OPPO Find X6 Pro : The main problem is that the high light pressure system is obviously weaker than that of friends and businesses, and the "sandwich" of continuous shooting is serious, and there is often no time to complete the processing of samples (if there is a complete algorithm processing, it will deliberately lower the dark part+apply more forcefully. If there is a sandwich, there will be a sense of both HDR vision similar to the Meizu's violent pulling of the dark part), the main camera and the ultra wide angle have obvious ghost glare comparable to the iPhone Interpolated high pixel mode High pixel mode is lonely, Hasu/professional mode is more "monosodium glutamate".
In addition, its photography consumes high power. In the three hour night scene shooting, Samsung Xiaomi consumes about 20% power (1143 and 1201 photos respectively), vivo consumes 30% power (1310 photos), and OPPO consumes more than 40% power (1136 photos, almost no power to go home).
But its The advantages are also very strong Today's strongest ultra wide angle, strongest medium and long focal (the first one can be called in extremely weak light, and the main telephoto can be hung), extremely easy to use and comfortable portrait mode (even I like to use it), image style that pursues contrast is easy to produce, relatively close to the naked eye, and the discrimination of default mode is good.
Finally, there is today's first mobile preview effect. No matter what kind of mobile phone photos, 30% points can be added when viewed on the 2500 nit peak screen. In addition to OPPO's ProXDR effect, when we watched the camera, we thought OPPO would be invincible until we were led to the same device to watch it (although it is really the first one now).
vivo X90 Pro+： The main problems are the photographic experience, the weak 2-3.5-fold focal length, the degree of darkness brightening that will be criticized this year, the night vision meter, and the ultra wide angle discrimination affected by violent HDR.
The core advantages are the exaggerated capture efficiency (although the shooting experience is average), the quality of the lens that is still in the sky (the glare/ghost control against the sky), the highlight suppression of the sky, the balanced main shooting, the 2x telephoto and 3.5x telephoto relay (10 times of the gross counting effect, and 5 times of Xiaomi's optics are true).
When shooting continuously in dim light, the shutter will be suspended from time to time, and the viewfinder will occasionally jam. However, in fact, only vivo X90 Pro+can fully respond to all shutter clicks (including night view/high pixel mode), and almost never "sandwiched". Every sample is completely processed and then output. It's incredible how many times you test it.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: It does not have such obvious shortcomings as domestic manufacturers, but its long board is not prominent enough. It stresses balance and extremely weak light intensity is exaggerated. The key word is discrimination. Samsung is really a manufacturer of "telescopes". Although the noise is not smeared cleanly, it makes the high pixel mode of the main camera and the discrimination of the two telephotos superior. At present, there is no match for the 10 times or more focal length.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra: The advantage is more restrained sharpening than that of friends and businesses. The picture is relatively natural. Leica's vivid mode is really vivid and pleasing (although only its white balance is floating). The night scene atmosphere is good, easy to form films and attract eyeballs. The weakness is that the main shooting night scene discrimination is weak, the super wide angle is weak, the huge focal section gap before 5 times, and the portrait mode is weak, but after all, it is not so much for old comrades to participate in the guest show, so I will check Xiaomi 13 Ultra later.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
