Although there is no wireless charger and 2K screen, the vivo X80 is the most evenly priced and configured of several Tianji 9000 models sold. Many people are also concerned about the level of photography that MediaTek can achieve with vivo algorithm. Now let's simply compare the photos taken by vivo X80, Redmi K50 Pro, Find X5 Pro and iQOO 9 Pro.
The main camera of the four mobile phones is 1/1.5 inch:
GN5 is the Samsung version of IMX766, IMX866 is the filter enhanced version of IMX766, and HM2 is the shame of 100 million pixels. The unit pixel is too small, so there is no HM2 model that can take photos.
Vivo X80 and K50 Pro are Tianji 9000, OPPO Find X5 Pro and iQOO 9 Pro are Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
The disadvantage of the vivo X80 is Fage's ISP and deployment. The advantage is that the vivo V1+and RGBW are arranged.
Specific specifications:
Vivo X80 is RGBW's IMX8665000W, 1/1.49 ", 1 μ m, F1.75, OIS. Ultra wide angle is 1200W with distortion correction, IMX663, 1.22 μ m, 1/2.93 '', 2PD focusing, F2.0. Two times portrait telephoto is also IMX663, but the aperture is larger than ultra wide angle, F1.98, Surprise!
The main camera of iQOO 9 Pro is micro pan tilt GN55000W, 1/1.57 '', 1 μ m, F1.75. 150 degree ultra wide angle JN15000W, 1/2.76 ", 0.64 μ m, F2.27. 2.5 times long focus S5K3P91600W, 1 μ m, 1/3.1", OIS, F2.23.
OPPO Find X5 Pro is much more luxurious. Five axis anti shake (dual OIS)+IMX766 main camera of G6P lens, 5000W, 1.0 μ m, 1/1.56 ", OIS, F1.7. Ultra wide angle is free-form surface lens IMX766, F2.2. Long focus is twice light variable 1300W, S5K3M5, 1 μ m, 1/3.4", F2.4.
The main camera of Redmi K50 Pro is 10800W, S5KHM2, 0.7 μ m, 1/1.52 ", F1.9, OIS. The ultra wide angle is 800W, S5K4H7，1.12μm，1/4''，F2.2。
"2x zoom" contrast
"2x zoom" contrast, panoramic contrast and central contrast
"2x zoom" contrast 2, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast
In extremely weak light, the viewfinder brightness of vivo X80 is only second to that of Find X5 Pro. Vivo V1+has an ultra wide angle of 1.22 μ m, which is second only to the shooting brightness of OPPO Naniana X+IMX766.
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 3, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 5, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 6, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Subjective contrast
The contrast of the main shooting brightness, the brightness of the vivo X80 in extremely weak light is not as exaggerated as that of the night vision camera, but it is true that the brightness of the dark part of the picture is higher than that of the Find X5 Pro.
Main camera contrast 1, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Main camera contrast 2
Main camera contrast 3, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Main camera contrast 4, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Main picture contrast 5, panoramic and central amplification contrast
Main camera contrast 6, panoramic and central magnification contrast
Main picture contrast 7, panoramic and central amplification contrast
Summary
The most easy to judge is the Redmi K50 Pro, which is the gap between CMOS and algorithm. HM2 main camera and 800W ultra wide angle camera are weak in hardware. As a result, the multi frame synthesis of Redmi main camera is extremely difficult to trigger. Except for extremely weak light scenes, almost all the others are single frame output. Bring it in for comparison. The prison guards at Guantanamo said they couldn't bear it.
Although the OPPO Find X5 Pro is overpriced, it does have the best photo taking experience in Android today, and the slow shutter speed under extremely weak light will not exceed half a second (although some samples will not have time for multi frame synthesis during continuous shooting, resulting in "sandwiches"). The main weakness is that the noise is not clean, but the highlight suppression has also made considerable progress. Due to its longer equivalent focal length, its analytical power is slightly better than that of two vivo mobile phones, and its weak light performance is also one gear better than that of iQOO 9 Pro and vivo X80. Of course, the pricing is also high 1 and 2.
However, the vivo X80 has obvious RGBW sensor characteristics, and the dark part is a bit "too dark", which reduces the contrast of the picture. Some scenes will appear lighter, and the white balance tends to be yellowish green. However, the overall range is not serious. It has been able to compete with the iQOO 9 Pro using Qualcomm ISP, making Fage's photography stand up. Considering the price gap and the impact of the UNDK platform, this wave is really possible.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
