In order to cover the common focus segments, the mainstream flagship has become the combination of "main camera+ultra wide angle+telephoto", which is still highly practical. However, it is a pity that no mobile phone can dominate "main camera, ultra wide angle and telephoto" at the same time. Therefore, users who have a need for mobile photography should make a choice according to their personal needs. I hope this photo review can help readers who need to make choices.
In this photo review, the participating models include: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra, Xiaomi 10 Ultra, One Plus 8 Pro+, vivo X50 Pro+, Galaxy Z Flip 5G, iPhone 11 Pro Max 512GB Dark Night Green National Travel's first full version with AppleCare+non Hainan duty-free version.
This is the content for depth photography users, and some of the content will exceed the outline. If you don't have enough time or want to eat the melon from the horizontal review, each part has an independent summary, and you can directly turn to the conclusion.
Parameter comparison
There are too many models, and the parameter list is a bit crowded. In addition to the IMX700 (5000W, 1.22 μ m. 4 in 1 to 2.44 μ m. 1/1.28 "), today's strongest CMOS is here:
The strongest theoretical ranking is Xiaomi 10 Ultra OV48C (2.4 after 4in1 μ 1200W for m, with more thorough dual native ISO, but without dual core focusing)
Vivo X50 Pro+/iQOO 5 Pro S5KGN1 μ 1250W for m, with dual core focusing)
One plus 8 Pro/OPPO Find X2 Pro IMX689 μ 1200W for m, with dual native ISO, omni focus)
Later, Samsung's flagship S5KHM1 and Xiaomi 10/10 Pro's S5KHMX will be used, while the iPhone will still use the "old" 1.4 μ M CMOS and Flip 5G are also Samsung products in 2019.
Ultra wide angle: In addition to Huawei's oversized sole, the strongest specification is the IMX586 with 8 Pro (1.6 of 4 in 1 μ m) , followed by S5K2L3 (1.4 μ m) , Xiaomi 10 Ultra super large wide-angle IMX350. Vivo X50 Pro+and Z Flip 5G are both S5K3L6 (1.12 μ m) , Bicai Chicken 1 μ M One gear should be strengthened.
The weakest hardware is still the iPhone. With a small aperture lens, its performance is unbelievable (so that many Apple users think the camera is broken when they use ultra wide angle at night).
Long focus: The strongest is the Xiaomi 10 Ultra IMX586 (really a good CMOS, which can be used anywhere) with a 4.8x optical zoom, followed by the Note 20 Ultra and vivo X50 Pro+S5K3M5, which are almost identical in specifications (Note 20 Ultra is 123mm equivalent focal length, X50 Pro+is 128mm equivalent focal length).
However, between the 5 times telephoto of the main camera, Xiaomi and vivo both have 2 times telephoto as relay, while the Note20 Ultra does not. The lack of daily focus directly affects the practicability. Apple has only 2 times the telephoto (but the aperture has increased to F2.0). Z Flip 5G, as a slim folding machine, gave up the long focus section directly.
remarks
In order to facilitate browsing, the "central magnification" samples are all magnified at high magnification. However, this does not mean that the photography of these machines is very poor, or that the gap between them is very small, just that the magnification is too exaggerated.
If a little careful comparison is needed Love to play computer games If you browse the official website, you can click the "non central enlarged sample" to view the large picture. If you need a detailed comparison, you can download the original sample from the dial. Link: , extraction code: pk5d
The focus of all samples is at the center of the picture. Except for the super night view mode specifically described, all other models are fully automatic.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Super wide angle scene 1 (the color of the sky is broken after jigsaw processing, but the impact on color and local details can be ignored)
Ultra wide angle scene 1, zoomed in at the center (iPhone and Z Flip ultra wide angle are so weak that you can't even see the rock of the mountain)
Super wide angle scene 2
Ultra wide angle scene 2, central magnification
Ultra wide angle scene 3 (ultra wide angle of one plus 8 Pro and X50 Pro+, 120 degree field of view is obviously smaller than other machines)
Ultra wide angle scene 3, central magnification (Samsung's white balance and saturation style are extremely unified)
Ultra wide angle scene 4
Ultra wide angle scene 4, central magnification
Ultra wide angle scene 5
Ultra wide angle scene 5, central magnification
Ultra wide angle scene 6
Ultra wide angle scene 6, central magnification
Ultra wide angle scene 7
Ultra wide angle scene 7, central magnification
Ultra wide angle summary
The actual performance is highly consistent with the specifications:
IMX586 of one plus 8 Pro (1.6 of 4in1 μ m) It has advantages in tolerance and extreme discrimination (after all, it is a big bottom and a small wide angle);
S5K2L3 (1.4) of Note20 Ultra μ m) Secondly, thanks to Samsung's multi frame synthesis algorithm, although there are many noise points when the light is poor, the discrimination and tolerance are very good;
Xiaomi 10 Ultra basically depends on the super wide angle. In addition, the multi frame synthesis of the current version of firmware is very active, and the highlight suppression is very good (but it affects the photographic experience).
Both S5K3L6 (1.12 μ m) The vivo X50 Pro+and Z Flip 5G are 50% open, and Flip has a larger wide-angle, so its analytical ability suffers. X50 Pro+, on the contrary, is slightly better at discrimination, but the perspective of ultra wide angle is small;
The ultra wide angle CMOS of the iPhone 11 Pro Max is inherently weak, coupled with the aperture of F2.4, not to mention the lighting environment, even in the evening, it is on the verge of overturning. Non Apple users should not be surprised that this seemingly broken camera was really so weak from the moment it was born.
Ultra long focal contrast
Space is limited. Here we mainly compare the 5x telephoto of Note20 Ultra, Xiaomi 10 Ultra and vivo X50 Pro+. Other machines use their own highest magnification telephoto lens to meet the challenge (one plus 8 Pro is actually 2.2 times light variable, iPhone is 2 times light variable, Z Flip 5G is the main camera).
Ultra long focus scene 1
Super telephoto scene 1, zoomed in on the left side of the center (the gap is too cruel)
Ultra long focus scene 1, central magnification
Super telephoto scene 1, zoomed in below the center
Ultra long focus scene 2, central magnification
Ultra long focus scene 3, central magnification
Ultra long focus scene 4, central magnification
Ultra long focus scene 5, central magnification
Summary of ultra long focal length
Seriously, more than three times the telephoto is of little significance for daily use. However, the manufacturers were involved in the "double rate arms race". Many flagship sacrificed their volume, weight and batteries, but only replaced a lonely ultra long coke (the double rate was too high, except for the showroom and the moment of purchase, it was basically useless). But after all, it is the manufacturers who show their muscles. We also take a look at the limits of mobile optical products:
Xiaomi 10 Ultra IMX586 with 4.8 times optical focal length is strong regardless of the scene, obviously stronger than the normal 5 times zoom;
The 5x telephoto of Note20 Ultra and vivo X50 Pro+has almost the same specifications (S5K3M5, 1 μ m. F3.0), which is really "five in five", mainly due to the difference between white balance and noise reduction.
Interestingly, the Note20 Ultra telephoto is 123mm, the main camera is 25mm, the light changes about 4.9 times, and the sub camera switches at 4.8 times. Vivo should be the only one. The actual value of the telephoto exceeds the nominal value. Vivo X50 Pro+telephoto 128mm, but the main camera is 24mm, and the actual light change is slightly greater than 5x zoom. However, they are all above 120mm, and the focus difference of 5mm cannot be extended in imaging.
The one plus 8 Pro in the second echelon is 2.2 times larger than the iPhone, but it is actually a whole gear better. The poor Z Flip 5G was present innocently, just to see how far away the "telescope" can be from the main camera.
Main camera
Main scene 1
Main scene 1, central magnification
Main scene 1, zoom in below the center
Main scene 2
Main scene 2, central magnification
Main scene 3
Main scene 3, central magnification
Main scene 4
Main scene 4, zoom in below the center
Main scene 4, central magnification
Main scene 5
Main scene 5, central magnification
Main scene 6
Main scene 6, central magnification
Main scene 7
Main scene 7, central magnification
Main scene 7, zoom in above the center
Main scene 8
Main scene 8, central magnification
Main scene 9
Main scene 9, central magnification
Main scene 10, super light ratio (pay attention to the details of light and shade, Xiaomi and one plus two models with dual native ISO have significantly better performance)
The main scene is 10, and the super large light is magnified in the center of the dark part of the scene (Samsung's overall light measurement is dark, which is a big loss here)
Main scene 11
Main scene 11, central magnification
Main scene 12
Main scene 12, central magnification
Focus on the extremely weak light scene 1 (the extremely weak light scene has one leaky tape plus 8 Pro, and Z Flip 5G has not participated because it is too weak)
Focus on extremely weak light scene 1, central magnification
Focus on extremely weak light scene 1, zoom in below the center
Focus on the extremely weak light scene 2 (the extremely weak light scene has a leaky tape plus 8 Pro, and Z Flip 5G did not participate because it is too weak)
Focus on extremely weak light scene 2, central magnification
Focus on extremely weak light scene 2, zoom in above the center
Main summary
The gap between the main cameras is not as obvious as that between the sub cameras:
In addition to "the existing firmware of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is easy to change the night vision device in the light/weak light scene because the light measurement is too bright, and the overall primary color of Samsung is too red (which is already regarded as imaging)", the light measurement and white balance of all machines are relatively accurate, without obvious shortcomings. However, in most scenarios, the iPhone is the most accurate in white balance (only the benchmark white dot is slightly yellow).
In terms of discrimination, they are all top 1200W pixels, which can not open the gap. The main reason is to adjust and choose between "noise reduction, sharpening, contrast, saturation". Most scenes can be split five to five with the addition of 8 Pro, vivo X50 Pro+, and Note20 Ultra.
The style of Yijia is a little like that of Vivo. The triple force of "contrast, sharpening and noise reduction" is pleasing to the eye, but when you look closely, you will feel "dry" and have a sense of oil painting. The Note20 Ultra is a worry free type. The multi frame synthesis performance is stable and the trigger rate is high, but the sensor is weaker and will suffer in weak light/extremely weak light scenes.
The Xiaomi 10 Ultra will be the first in the scene that can trigger multi frame synthesis. However, its firmware tuning has not yet been stabilized. When the "Schrodinger" HDR is not triggered, its performance will be average. In extremely low light scenes, it is the strongest night vision device in several sets, and there is nothing to say about the picture brightness and details. Today's mobile phones can achieve this level, which was unimaginable a few years ago.
The iPhone and Z Flip 5G are not at the bottom of the list, but Apple's photo taking experience is still invincible, and there is no match at all. The auto triggered super night view mode can also leapfrog. However, the basic gap is there, and no matter how good the experience is, it can not be recovered.
Why is there no Meizu 17 Pro on the cover? Sorry, there is no optical anti shake IMX686, and there is no need to compare
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
