The vivo X7 and X7 Plus are released together, but the price of the latter has not yet been announced. It is estimated that many people will be curious about how the X7 Plus with a larger screen, better endurance and better photography will work? Let's compare them now.
The biggest difference between X7 and X7 Plus in appearance is that the former is a 5.2 inch screen, while the latter is a 5.7 inch screen. However, the length of the screen frame and forehead and chin are very close, resulting in a higher screen proportion and a more rigid X7 Plus.
The front is made of 2.5D glass, which will have delicate reflective effect in the light. The main difference between their forehead is that the X7 Plus's camera and earpiece are farther away.
The Home keys of the two are almost identical, but the X7 Plus has a wider panel, which increases the distance between the three diamond keys. In addition, the radian of the corners of the X7 Plus is smaller than that of the X7, which is the main reason why the shape of the X7 Plus is more square.
The back is the same all metal body, with two antenna partition strips on the upper and lower sides passing by. Except for the logo and camera, the whole back is almost empty.
The height of the camera, flashlight and antenna partition bar of the two machines are the same, so the X7 Plus is more spacious.
At the bottom are simple production information. The color of the two gold version machines is relatively light under the side light, and the tinting is relatively low-key.
There are not many changes to the side buttons, but there are some differences in height, and the thickness of the two buttons is relatively close. The sim card slot is on the top left, and the volume and power buttons are on the top right.
All openings on the top of the machine are unified to the bottom, but curiously, no openings for noise reduction microphones are found on the fuselage.
The bottom is a headphone connector, a main microphone, a mirco USB connector, and a 6-hole speaker. Although vivo has always pursued new technologies, it has always been conservative in terms of compatibility, such as the reserved menu keys and the reserved mirco USB interface.
Compared with the battle damage Xplay5, the X7 Plus with a 5.7 inch screen, the Xplay5 with a 5.43 inch screen, and the X7 with a 5.2 inch screen are displayed from left to right. The front difference between the two series of machines is very obvious.
The back is still vivo The traditional all metal three-stage fuselage, but the X7 series corners are significantly more rounded.
The volume key layout on the right is similar.
However, the sim card slot of the Xplay5 is located at the lower part of the left fuselage, while the X7 series is the more common top.
The Xplay5 in the middle has a noise reducing microphone and headphone connector on the top, and the X7 series has been removed.
The bottom headphone connector and noise reduction microphone opening are also slightly different.
Vivo has always insisted on the all metal three-stage fuselage, which has almost become a synonym for itself. Different people have different views on aesthetics, but the workmanship and refinement are really better than the three-stage fuselage with plastic sheets sticking up and down.
The 5.7 inch fuselage of the X7 Plus is just the size of the Samsung Note series. The narrow border and arc processing give you a good grip, but you can't expect more with one hand operation.
It may be hard for girls to carry it, but there must be The effect of showing small face.
The X7 Plus is equipped with the same Funtouch OS 2.5.1 as the X7. It is still based on the Android 5.1 kernel, which is a pity.
Although the X7 Plus screen is larger, the entire system display is a magnified version of X7, and the number of content seen on the same page is completely consistent.
=[
X7 Plus is also equipped with Snapdragon 652+4G memory+64G eMMC5.1 storage (another 128G version). In terms of performance, its performance almost coincides with that of X7, except for the cooling advantage brought by the larger body. The scores of the on-site testing machine are low due to the continuous score running, but they are small on the whole.
Vivo claims to have adopted its own scheduling mechanism. The Snapdragon 652 on the X7 Plus is slightly more active than the Samsung A9. The A72 core will only be fully opened for a short time at the moment of opening applications and large games. The rest is basically two A72 and four low-frequency A53 running.
In terms of photography, X7 Plus is equipped with this year's famous flagship CMOS - IMX298, which is a 4:3 16 million pixel sensor. The actual photographing experience is much better than that of X7. The shutter response and continuous shooting speed have been significantly improved. The problem of slight sensitivity to photometry on X7 has not occurred, and the film completion rate has also been to a certain extent promote. However, the processing time in HDR, ultra clear and night view modes is close and not fast.
Left: automatic mode Right: HDR mode
In the actual sample, even the camera in the light will have a very obvious effect after HDR is turned on. In addition to showing a stronger metal texture than the automatic mode, its dark details are also significantly improved. It seems to have obvious differences from the X7's light handed treatment.
Left: Automatic mode Right: Ultra clear mode
When the ultra clear mode is enabled, multiple frames can be combined to generate 4 times the number of pixels, and the final sample will be changed from the original 4160 * 3120 has doubled to 8320 * 3240, and the size has also increased from 2MB/piece to 8-9MB/piece. But the details of the film have been greatly enhanced. The sharpening algorithm is needed in the automatic mode, but there is no obvious sharpening trace in the ultra clear mode, and the edge of the object is extremely clear and sharp, the effect seems to be exaggerated than the previous generation, but the specific improvement has to be determined in the subsequent test.
Although the processing time has reached 2 or 3 seconds, in many cases, the improvement of this effect is completely worthwhile. It is highly recommended to enable this function in the landscape or group photo that needs to be analyzed.
X7 Plus has obvious advantages in details and noise control. It performs well in discrimination. The color adjustment is slightly brighter than the naked eye, flattering, and the white balance is relatively stable.
But after all, there is no optical anti shake, and a higher ISO is required under weak light, but the noise smearing algorithm is relatively powerful. The iris algorithm on X7 Plus shows many shadows of the Xshot in the past at the details. It is difficult to see conventional large noise points, and the details remain intact, performing well.
Later, we will compare the samples of X7 and X7 Plus in detail. Please pay attention.
