One week's media evaluation of the main points - Phase II
One week's media evaluation of the main points - Phase II

 One week's media evaluation of the main points - Phase II

 

Wen/Jiaju Mayday

After reading 60+articles reviewed by the media this week, it was late at night. At this time, I feel deeply powerless. The reviews are too toxic. Most of them are boring and lengthy, which is also an important reason for me to review the reviews they wrote - I hope you can read my articles in addition to the reviews. Even, it is better to see their evaluation than my evaluation.

This week, four manufacturers held press conferences, namely Jinli, Coke, IUNI and Coolpad. So many media reviews this week focused on the new products released by these four manufacturers. However, most of the manufacturers' evaluation machines have not yet been delivered to the media, so many of them were brief introductions on the appearance, hardware parameters and systems at the press conference site, without particularly in-depth and original insights, which is one reason why the reviews this week were not brilliant. However, after the Spring Festival, most of the domestic media were exposed to LG G Flex and Sony Z1 Compack, so there were many reviews on these two models. Let's take a look at the specific content of each media evaluation.

 One week's media evaluation of the main points - Phase II

(Data as of 18:00 p.m. on February 21)

Zhongguancun Mobile Channel's two reviews of Cool School Grand View 4 are special How to put it? I always feel something is wrong. The whole article only talks about Grand View 4, which is powerful and brilliant In another article about the evaluation of Coolpad products, I only remember the last sentence, "I have to say that Coolpad 5951 has a lot of advantages over its competitors in the same level in terms of UI." Of course, this is not the most brutal. They used a certain phone of Coolpad to conduct a horizontal comparison evaluation with iPhone and iPod classic. I dare not say more, for fear that Sect Leader Qiao will be angry and come back to life. In addition, Yao Ming, do you dare to compare your height with me? Finally, it should be noted that the words used by the editors of Zhongguancun Online are also worth pondering. For example, when it comes to insufficient information, they usually use "just", "slightly", "only regret" This may be a little inappropriate!

Although there is much less content in the channel of machine front evaluation, there are also enough popular points. They wrote that, unlike other mobile phone manufacturers in China, "this once military brand has a persistent demand for battery life..." It seems that battery life is the pursuit of all manufacturers. In the evaluation of Jin Litianjian W808, they unexpectedly used the scoring software, but did not use more space to talk about business people's information security, business convenience and other aspects, which is really regrettable. However, the evaluation of G-shock is very impressive. You have a desire to read it. If you are interested in the opponent watch, you can go and have a look.

In the article "The New Four Check Test of Huawei Hisense V9R1 with Eight Cores" on Pacific Computer Network, it is so "black" that I Dahua is Hisense. "In the advanced version of quadrant test, Hisense V9R1 still ranks last." "Although Hisense V9R1 has no qualitative change, its overall performance is close to the level of flagship chips in 2011 or 2012." Does my big mouth know this?

The evaluation of mobile phones in China is relatively more standard. The evaluation and experience of Jinli ElifeS5.5 can even be considered that TA has never taken the machine, and such a large forehead and chin is always a pain that the author would not mention. As for the evaluation of Hisense X6C, I just want to say that is it worth buying a phone with NFC letters written on the back of the phone? Of course, the Jolla mobile phone equipped with the Sailfish system is also not worth buying. The last sentence of the author is too sentimental. "The price of $550 makes its cost performance ratio a little ridiculous."...

IT168 published many evaluation articles this week, and I also spent a lot of time carefully reading the words of the authors. It is found that IT168 is still a reliable evaluation organization on the whole. On the one hand, the advantages of mobile phones will be mentioned, on the other hand, the shortcomings will also be put forward, and specific suggestions for modification will be given to the manufacturer, which is relatively comprehensive on the whole. This reminds me of the evaluation published by Zhongguancun Online. In the Internet era, information asymmetry has gradually weakened. Consumers are not fools, and there are no perfect people. How can they get perfect mobile phones? But under their pen, they resolutely abandoned this consensus and completed the impossible task.

The mobile channels of Netease and Tencent are more about the display of information, and some reviews are not the first, but you can see many other media reviews.

 One week's media evaluation of the main points - Phase II

I think we should give up the evaluation when we encounter such mobile phones. You don't want them to sell.

The evaluation of Fengchao Evaluation Room is more sincere. It not only highlights the highlights of the product, but also points out the shortcomings of the product, which can also enable manufacturers to better improve and make better products.

This article of Red Rice/Glory 3C/God F1 on Android is relatively comprehensive, which also shows the author's professional attitude. It is recommended that players who want to buy a thousand yuan machine can refer to it.

During the review, I was delighted to find a Nokia 301 review. I secretly thought that this group of editors would never find a software to score it. Well, fortunately, it didn't frighten me. I talked about some general contents and use feelings throughout the article. In fact, the evaluation itself is so boring. You made me watch more than 60 articles. So let's just say that again, it's better to watch these editors' comments than my comments on their comments!

During the review, I saw many products that had no voice in microblog or other social media before, and found that most of these brands have a feature, putting the logo of mobile phones on the front. Obviously, I am not the target customer of these mobile phone manufacturers. Because I always think that the mobile phone with the brand logo on the front is something that can only be done by manufacturers who are low to a certain extent. Sometimes life is the same, isn't it? You try your best to make others remember you, which will only make people forget you faster.

Ladies and gentlemen, have a nice weekend! Love to play computer games , also love life.

Share:
chenjiaju
edit
Benefits!
Share Weibo Share WeChat
 Aigoji WeChat

Aigoji WeChat

 WeChat

WeChat

Recommended products

Sorry, the product you are looking for is not available in the product library

on trial