The Genuine GT7 Pro was officially released on November 4, 2004. It "killed the game" with a price starting from 3599 yuan.
Real GT7 Pro has Snapdragon 8 Premium, 1.5K Samsung Eco ² OLED Plus and other deep micro curved screens, LYT-600 periscope telephoto, 6500mAh battery+120W fast charge, and the initial price is: 12+256 version 3599 yuan, 16+256 version 3899 yuan, 12+512 version 3999 yuan, 16+512 version 4299 yuan, 16+1TB version 4799 yuan.
Appearance&Workmanship&Hand&Fingerprint Identification&External Release&Vibration
The charger is Morgen A port, 11V 11A 120W, and the same OCBBOACH as the real GT6. The violent and sturdy 12A wire is delivered.
There are longitudinal "stainless steel" wire drawing lines on the back cover, which are obvious to the naked eye ↑
There are fewer antenna partitions (6) in the middle frame of the real GT7 Pro than the 7 and 8 of the common flagship, and the infrared transmitter is moved from the top to the camera matrix.
13 Pro+, GT6, GT7 Pro ↑
iQOO 13、 Real GT7 Pro, One Plus 13
iQOO 13、 Real GT7 Pro, One Plus 13 ↑
This one is Star Trace Titanium, frosted aluminum alloy middle frame+AG glass back cover. The back cover has obvious longitudinal wire drawing lines, which Ben likes very much.
The square Deco of Genuine GT7 Pro uses "two steps". The metal decorative block outside the camera circle is red at the chamfer.
The camera area is a little higher than that of friends, which is good for heat dissipation.
The front is a slightly curved screen with equal depth, the middle frame is slightly higher than the glass on the front and back, and the visual frame is slightly thicker.
Really GT7 Pro has IP68+IP69 protection The specifications of infrared, USB 2.0 and X-axis motors are unknown (0809 according to the actual vibration sense);
High pass single point ultrasonic fingerprint (Underwater unlocking is supported): the speed is close to the ultrasonic fingerprint of the summit of friends (the main reason is that the playback speed of the unlocking animation is slower);
Dual speakers: The specification is unknown, the volume is OK, and the sound quality is average. The volume of the upper speaker is too low, and the sound field will be biased toward the lower speaker.
On 5G band The real GT7 Pro is less than One Plus 13, but more than iQOO 13:
IQOO 13 and iQOO 12 are n1/n3/n5/n8/n28A/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78 (but the number of antenna partitions of iQOO 13 is 9 more than the normal value);
The real GT7 Pro is n1/3/5/8/[n20]/28A/38/40/41/[n66]/n77/n78 (6 antenna partitions);
One plus 13 is n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/[n20]/n28A/n38/n40/n41/[n48]/[n66]/n77/n78/[n83A] (8 antenna partition strips)
About the n79 band: This is a frequency band that is naturally very suitable for deployment in crowded places such as high-speed railway stations, airports and stadiums. However, the N79 band is owned by China Mobile and Radio and Television, and is now mainly deployed in some areas of the first tier cities. Operators once required that mobile phones must support the n79 band, but now generally only the Pro/Ultra models of major brands will have the n79 band (except Find X8 Pro).
Streaming saving: support for the N79 frequency band is not an important factor affecting mobile phone purchase, but only a bonus item.
The first Samsung Eco ² OLED Plus screen (without polarizer) of the straight board machine
Genuine GT7 Pro is a 6.78 inch, 120Hz, 1.5K, mid mounted, perforated, etc. deep micro curved screen OLED (8T LTPO First launch [Samsung Eco ² OLED Plus panel] (Power consumption is reduced by 52% at most), Samsung S2 flexible substrate, no polarizer (degree of polarization is 0)+full brightness Single pulse DC dimming, also 2160Hz high-frequency PWM optional . Dolby Vision and HDR10+are supported.
2780x1264450ppi, now the strongest [full white peak brightness 2000 nits+manual 1000 nits], local peak 6000 nits, 2600Hz instantaneous touch sampling rate.
Subpixel micrograph of real GT7 Pro ↑ (pixel spacing will be larger than normal screen)
【Eco² OLED Plus】 It is a technology used by Samsung in folding screens. It was released in August 22, and was first launched by Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4. Later, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5/6 and Xiaomi MIX Fold 3 are all such screens.
Compared with traditional OLED, Eco ² OLED has a 33% increase in light transmittance and a 25% reduction in power consumption at the same brightness (Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 debuted, also seen in Xiaomi MIX FOLD 2);
Compared with traditional OLEDs, Eco ² OLED Plus has 160% higher light transmittance and 37% lower power consumption at the same brightness.
Genuine GT7 Pro is the first straight board machine with Eco ² OLED Plus screen , even Samsung's own flagship Galaxy S series has not been used (this screen is expensive, but the main reason why the Galaxy S series is not used is the production problem).
Eco ² OLED Plus is the future development direction of OLED screens , so we will beep more here.
Eco² OLED Plus， To save flow is to go The polarizer is lost ， Higher brightness, lower power, and "incidentally" non polarization (After all, there is no polarizer) And higher color gamut (Color filter is used instead of polarizer) - its power consumption is 500 nits It is 40% lower than the OLED screen of 8T LTPO and 52% lower than the LTPS screen.
Some Yanzu may wonder why polarizers were added in the first place?
A: To put it bluntly, it is to reduce the reflection of the screen itself. In addition, if the screen itself is not black but white at the extreme point, the contrast will be overwhelming - when the screen displays black, OLED pixels are not bright, but what we see is white (because the "screen" is white), which can also be used to complement the scene of "looking at the screen content through the reflection of the mirror screen".
Although the color of the screen itself is not white, it is also definitely not black (it does not reflect light of all colors, which is black). Without anti reflection treatment, it is unnecessary to say that the circuit layer, for example, when displaying purple (red light+blue light), red and blue sub pixels are emitting light, but the green sub pixels that are not lit are also reflecting green light, which will also mix into purple, and the color will float to grandma's home.
200x enlarged image of the iPhone 15 Pro Max screen of ifixtit ↓
Continue to enlarge to 1050 times ↓
Samsung replaced the function of the original polarizer by [blackening the circuit between pixels+covering the pixels with the same color filter].
As I learned in the second grade of primary school, polarizer will sacrifice/filter out more than 50% of the light (its light transmittance is not 100%, so it will exceed 50%), so after removing this "brightness drag", OLED sub pixels can achieve the same brightness with lower output, and screen energy efficiency and peak brightness can be greatly improved.
Under strong light, you can see that there is a circle on the right of the front camera, which is the ambient light sensor ↑
(But when the screen is lit, even the lowest brightness, the sensor below can not be seen at all)
Eco ² OLED Plus is not a perfect technology, except for the above ↑ and the different reflection light lines under the strong point light source (Eco ² OLED Plus is a layer of concentric circles, and ordinary OLEDs are rainbow colored radiation).
it The main weakness is that the uniformity of low brightness is more difficult to do. The important reason for using PWM for OLED screen is to improve the voltage, so as to improve the uniformity. However, the current and voltage required by Eco ² OLED Plus are much lower, which naturally makes it more difficult to achieve uniformity.
In fact, the uniformity of the real GT7 Pro screen at the lowest brightness is indeed weaker than that of the iQOO 13 and One Plus 13, the most powerful domestic screens. Through simple visual inspection, it is about the level of 1080P OLED made in China one or two years ago. It has influence, but the influence is acceptable. Even if I had to choose again, I would also let the low brightness performance play for the sake of brightness and energy efficiency.
In addition, if you also open the kaleidoscope wheel eye and look carefully, you can vaguely see sub pixels in the black screen state. This feature is even more irrelevant.
Finally, don't play with your mobile phone when the lights are black!
(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)
Finally, look at the curative effect. The screen of the real GT7 Pro Brightness data all broke the record, which is far ahead (Manual full white/local, excitation full white/local) - All white excitation exceeds 2000 nits.
The uniformity is also exaggerated At the brightness level of 1000 nits, the full screen brightness difference is only 5 nits.
In the color calibration part, under the professional mode with the best color accuracy, Color accuracy or slightly output to domestic screen , although the gap is not big.
This screen has obvious micro prism characteristics, The visual angle is normal. At a large angle, you can see that the upper and lower parts of the screen are blue in different degrees.
Streaming saving means that in terms of fineness and stroboscopic control, it is not as good as one plus 13 and iQOO 13. But this really represents the ultra power saving screen technology in the future, and there is no worry about linearly polarized light. I don't know whether this screen will be released to GT Neo series like the previous generation.
IQOO 13 (polarized light processing), Genuine GT7 Pro (no polarizer), One Plus 13 (traditional domestic OLED) under polarized 3D glasses ↑
The Eco ² OLED Plus screen of the Genuine GT7 Pro also brings the feature of complete non polarization.
its The effect is superior to all circularly polarized light processing technologies in principle (Because there is no polarizer at all), the kind that can never be caught up.
Here is a reread of the iQOO 13 evaluation:
In terms of priority, circularly polarized light is under high frequency PWM, but for eye protection, more skills are not needed. The eye protection effect of circularly polarized light still belongs to the field of metaphysics that cannot be explained clearly. Human factor research says that it can effectively reduce the rate of redness, blink times, eyeball microwave movement, and improve the stability of lacrimal gland.
In addition, almost all desktop displays are not processed by circularly polarized light, including the Apple Studio Display that sells you 115000 (that is, the one with Apple A13 installed in the sky).
I don't know what the hidden relationship between the true self and Samsung is. Samsung has not been willing to do a single pulse DC like dimming for the LTPO screen, and is also not active in high-frequency PWM dimming (Previously, only a few models, such as Find X6 Pro, had used a full brightness 1440Hz high-frequency PWM Samsung screen, and the switch was still in the developer's option).
As a result, Samsung gave Eco ² OLED Plus and This 8T LTPO panel has a single pulse DC like dimming and a low brightness 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming , the treatment is better than that of his own son. It's totally different from Samsung, which we know, which gives the best technology to customers, but uses "backward" technology on its own mobile phone. This is what Lei Fengxia and Sony will do?!
However, because the black stripe of monopulse DC is too thick, the high-frequency PWM dimming mode is actually more eye friendly. Users who care about this should remember to switch manually.
Objective test: performance&heating&endurance&charging
After all, it is a new SoC. Continue to read:
Snapdragon 8 Elite is the same TSMC N3E process as Apple A18 series and Tianji 9400.
The second generation self-developed Oryon architecture CPU: 2 "super cores" 4.47GHz (shared 12MB L2)+6 "performance cores" 3.53GHz (shared 12MB L2), canceling L3 cache; The GPU is Adreno 850 @ 1.1GHz, with a 12MB independent cache.
high pass It claims that SoC can save 27% of power comprehensively; CPU single core/multi-core performance soared by 45% and power consumption decreased by 44% (when running to the peak performance of the previous generation); The game performance of the GPU is increased by 40%, the optical tracking performance is increased by 35%, and the power consumption is reduced by 40% (when running to the peak performance of the previous generation).
The performance of AI part is improved by 45% per watt. Qualcomm X80 5G baseband (10Gbps peak downlink, 3.5Gbps uplink, support 3GPP R17/R18); The FastConnect 7900 connection platform, upgraded to 6nm technology, is still 5.8Gbps WiFi 7 speed, supports Bluetooth 6.0, and integrates UWB.
CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
Two tests of flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar of each column, the stronger it is. Under the same conditions, the higher the capacity of flash memory, the higher the speed will be)
Even in GT mode (performance mode), The performance output is also weaker than iQOO 13 and One Plus 13 。
The daily CPU scheduling of the Genuine GT7 Pro is similar to that of the One Plus 13. It also relies on the absolute performance of the Snapdragon 8 Ultimate Edition, which often fishes at 2.4GHz.
Thermal stability test ↑, pay attention to the maximum temperature of the fuselage (the lower the better), the stability percentage (the higher the better), and the performance score (the higher the better).
But the temperature control line and thermal stability of the real GT7 Pro are extremely exaggerated.
Room temperature 25.8 degrees, 200 nit screen brightness. The maximum temperature of 3DMark toaster is 58.2 degrees. The last time the temperature control was so fierce, it was the Meizu of Snapdragon 888.
The strategy of killing and not reducing the frequency makes the thermal stability of the real GT7 Pro directly superior to that of the iQOO 13, and it is also a big departure from the one plus 13.
In the same environment, the room temperature is 27.2 degrees. After 20 minutes of "Elite of Peace" HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing, the maximum temperature is 36.2 degrees, and the performance is normal.
(Endurance test: the test environment is 27.2 degrees of room temperature, 200 nits of screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%. It includes 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surf, a total of 2.5 hours)
Real GT7 Pro is Snapdragon 8 Premium+low-power 1.5K Samsung Eco ² Plus screen+6500mAh battery, It's hard to think of a bad endurance, but it's good without any doubt 。
It is between 30% and 80% of power. The main reason why it has not left the opponent is that it has "reserved" power for the head and tail. The 1% and 100% of the head and tail are very durable - 100% of power. Run 3DMark's lightest toaster test. Do you believe it after running or 100% of power? After baking for three times, 92% of the electricity is too much.
In addition, in the endurance test model with screen brightness of 300 to 350 nits, the endurance advantage of the Genuine GT7 Pro will be increased. For the Eco ² OLED Plus screen, the higher the brightness, the greater the power consumption advantage. However, as we said in the iQOO 13 evaluation, the 200 nit is already higher than the brightness for daily indoor use. In the 350 nit test, the screen power consumption will obscure the difference between the power consumption of some SoCs and the system.
(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo ultra fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent ultra fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low-power charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default, and need to turn them on manually)
The real GT7 Pro is 6500mAh dual cell+120W fast charge (11V 11A extra large current). Unfortunately, 50W wireless charge has been removed this year.
The actual charging peak is 95W, and the main power ranges are 50W and 44W. 100% is displayed in 31 minutes, and the charge is cut off in 39 minutes. The first half is obviously faster than iQOO 13, but the trickle charging after 90% of the power consumption delayed.
The True Self GT7 Pro is compatible with 5A PPS (11V, online 42W) and 3A UFCS (online 24W or so).
Photo comparison
The image configuration of the Genuine GT7 Pro has also fallen back, but it still retains three times the periscope focus, which is more consistent than that of friends:
Front Sony 16 megapixel, F2.45, 5P lens
Main camera IMX906 (50 million pixels, 1 μ m, 1/1.56 type, with DAG HDR), F1.8+OIS， Equivalent 24mm
Ultra wide angle IMX355 (8 megapixel, 1.12 μ m, type 1/4), F2.2, 5P lens
3 times periscope telephoto (no macro), Sony LYT-600 (i.e. IMX8825 million pixels, 0.8 μ m, 1/1.95 type), F2.65+OIS， Equivalent to 73mm. Tri refraction+sensor flip structure. More than 60 times trigger AI over score
With this telephoto, the outer lens is round, which simplifies the focusing structure (without the macro function) and greatly compresses the volume. However, an additional refraction will lose some optical information, and the effect of the number of pixels and 2x2 OCL will be superimposed. The ultimate telephoto ability is weaker than that of the previous OV64B.
Maybe many users are still struggling with the photography level between them. Looking at the proof is better than beeping everything ↓.
For example, in order to see the difference at a glance on platforms with powerful compression algorithms such as WeChat, the magnified samples are all over magnified.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 1, global and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 2, global and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 3, global and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 4, global and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 5, global and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 6, global and central magnification
Subjective contrast
Main camera contrast, scene 1, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 2, global and central magnification
Double contrast, scene 3, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 3, global and central magnification
Double contrast, scene 3, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 4, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 5, global and central magnification
Double contrast, scene 5, global and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 6, global and central magnification
Telephoto contrast
Only the iQOO 13 with 2x telephoto uniformly uses 4x samples ↓
Long focus contrast, scene 1, global and central magnification
Long focus 6 is compared, scene 1 is enlarged in the center
Long focus contrast, scene 2, global and central magnification
Long focus 6 is compared, scene 1, central magnification (6 times of iQOO 12 Pro is "sandwiched" in this scene)
Long focus contrast, scene 3 (OV64B is in virtual focus in this scene)
Long focus contrast, scene 4, global and central magnification
Long focus 6 is compared, scene 4 is enlarged in the center
Long focus contrast, scene 5, global and central magnification
Long focus contrast, scene 6, global and central magnification
Long focus contrast, scene 7, global and central magnification
The IMX906 (aperture is smaller) of the Genuine GT7 Pro is the same as the Redmi K70 Premium, Glory 90 GT, Glory 100 Pro/200, Nubia Z60S Pro, Nubia Z60 Ultra Advanced (the latter two are special equivalent 35mm lenses). The actual performance is weaker than the IMX921 of iQOO 13.
It is unnecessary to evaluate the tactics of IMX355 in super wide angle.
The actual performance of the 3x LYT-600 telephoto is five times that of the one plus 13 telephoto. The main reason is that the performance of the lighting scene will be stronger.
summary
Even if it is stronger than the real self, the real self GT7 Pro has also increased by 300 yuan compared with the previous generation, and the upstream should indeed be growing.
No matter which manufacturer, cameras bear a large part of the price increase of chips and flash memory, resulting in the result of "small image years, big performance years".
But honestly, the real GT7 Pro【 Eco ² OLED Plus screen+high pass ultrasonic fingerprint 】The cost is estimated to be enough to bring back the previous generation of images and wireless charging, which can only be explained as the direction of the true self has changed.
The real GT7 Pro has the most power saving and brightest straight board computer screen today. The 6500mAh battery+120W fast charge can also be used for many years.
It has returned to USB 2.0 without wireless charging, and 222.8g is obviously biased. It is a pity to maintain 1.5K screen, but these are not problems for 3599. Redmi is authentic in realme!
The real GT7 Pro is 400 yuan cheaper than iQOO 13, 900 to 1000 yuan cheaper than one plus 13, 700 to 900 yuan cheaper than Xiaomi 15 and Glory Magic7, and 700 to 900 yuan cheaper than vivo X200. Compared with Glory Magic7 Pro, Xiaomi 15 Pro and X200 Pro, these models are even cheaper by 1700 to 2100 yuan, which is totally different from the products that are only one week short of release time
Don't say anything—— 3599, worthy of the name of GT.
The price of the previous generation of Genuine GT5 Pro has not changed much until it was delisted. This generation may also have a similar situation: buy early and enjoy early, and buy late may not enjoy discounts.
Later, we will see whether iQOO Neo10 Pro will avenge his brother iQOO 13. Although, Tianji 9400 can't compete with Snapdragon 8. Although, Neo series is a plastic middle frame with no telephoto
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
