The real GT Neo6 was released on May 9. Compared with the real GT Neo6 SE, the main options are chip upgrading, fast charging, more purple and 1TB options: Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, BOE 1.5K 8T LTPO curved screen, mainly photographed by LYT-600, 5500mAh battery+120W fast charge, priced from 2099 yuan.
Since the peripheral configuration is highly coincident with the real GT Neo6 SE, the focus of our evaluation this time is on performance and fast charging.
Simple configuration of Real GT Neo6:
Snapdragon 8s Gen 35500mAh battery+120W fast charge (11V 11A)
The most powerful 6.78 inch 120Hz 1.5K BOE S1 base material 8T LTPO curved screen in the same level
Front IMX615, LYT-600 5000W OIS main camera+800W IMX355 ultra wide angle
191g weight, 0809 motor+infrared+IP65+dual frequency GPS
2099 yuan for 12+256 version, 2399 yuan for 16+256 version, 2699 yuan for 16+512 version, 2999 yuan for 16+1TB version (headset and phone case are sent for the first time, and the price is guaranteed until 618).
Appearance&Workmanship&Hand&Fingerprint Identification&External Release&Vibration
This new 120W fast charge is The first 11V 11A super super super current scheme 。
The size and weight of the charger are very close to the 100W fast charge of our own, and they are all OEM products of Dongguan Aohai.
Still Mogai A port scheme, distribution of 12A wire (The previous 100W fast charging Neo6 SE is already the same 12A wire. The price performance ratio of Neo6 SE is+1).
The charger has a UFS in 44W gear, but it is still not supported by PD/PPS, which is not very environmentally friendly.
The appearance of Real GT Neo6 and Real GT Neo6 SE are identical ↑
Redmi Turbo 3、iQOO Z9 Turbo、 Real GT Neo6 SE (same as real GT Neo6), plus Ace 3V ↑
In addition to the silver knight (silver) and Cangye hacker (green), the real GT Neo6 has added a new purple color. The three-dimensional dimension is also consistent with Neo6 SE: 162x75.1x8.65mm, 191g weight.
Because it is a curved screen, the two brothers are the best among the 8s Gen 3/7+Gen 3 dragons.
Frosted plastic middle frame+smooth plastic back cover, low position short focal fingerprint, 0809X-axis motor, upper Raytheon 1012+lower Raytheon 1115 (half cavity) speaker (the upper half of the back cover resonates obviously, but the external display is good). With infrared IP65、 Dual band GPS+triple band Beidou.
Objective test: screen&performance&heating&endurance&charging
(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)
The Real Me GT Neo6 and Real Me GT Neo6 SE are both customized 6000nit dual screens by BOE, and the only 8T LTPO screen in the price range nearby:
6.78 inch 120Hz 1.5K 8T LPTO middle perforated curved screen, BOE S1 base material, 2780x1264450ppi.
Manual peak brightness 1000 nit, full white excitation 1600 nit, local peak 6000 nit.
Low brightness 2160Hz high-frequency PWM, high brightness three pulse+single pulse DC, gorilla Victus 2 glass cover plate.
Instantaneous touch sampling rate of 2500Hz, automatic identification of film type+wet hand touch to wait for OTA, also have the same air separation gesture of GT5 Pro
There is "Lvye AI Eye Protection" (AI eye fatigue detection adjusts color temperature, which can be adjusted in combination with the game duration)+ProXDR display of the flagship of Greenfield.
Genuine GTNeo6/Neo6 SE used the same screen as Genuine GT5 Pro , although the color accuracy and extreme brightness will be slightly weaker than that of my brother Brightness/uniformity/color accuracy are better than others, according to the peers.
In particular, this very popular brightness setting is the same as the GT5 Pro, which is 99% of the flagship.
After the single pulse DC is opened manually, the eye protection performance is also good, and there are many peripheral functions The main disadvantage is that the color deviation and brightness attenuation at large angles are not very high.
In the actual test, the brightness of the real GT Neo6 and Neo6 SE and the color accuracy of the natural mode/cinema mode are almost the same.
But the real GT Neo6 The gray scale deviation is larger, and the setting of "local brightness is lower than global brightness" is added.
CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
Flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar is for each column, the stronger it is)
The real GT Neo6 is a Snapdragon 8s Gen 310014mm ² double-layer VC soaking plate, LPDDR5x memory+UFS 4.0 flash memory.
It is an excellent control group with the authentic GT Neo6 SE of Snapdragon 7+Gen 3, which perfectly controls other variables. Again, it turns out that, The performance of the two brothers, Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and Snapdragon 7+Gen 3, is really the difference in frequency.
Real GT Neo6 CPU performance is relatively conservative, but GPU performance is stronger (Now, the most conservative one in the white list is the real person).
In the super core, cache chopping has a smaller impact on performance than expected, but it has a significant impact on energy efficiency (the X4 with 3GHz small cache has a really average energy efficiency when it reaches 3GHz, and the dessert frequency is actually below 2.8GHz).
The scheduling enthusiasm of the real self 8s Gen 3 is between iQOO and Redmi: The cold start of most system apps or the high load of "large apps" such as microblog can be fully opened with 8 cores, GT mode only increases the probability of full opening.
For the rest of the performance part, manually adjusting the highest frequency geek performance panel and game specific memory are the traditional operations of the true self. Real me GT Neo6 more Automatic identification of cooling back clip It does not need to be triggered by the Bluetooth connection, and automatically starts the "burning mode" (claiming that the mainstream Bluetooth cooling back clips are OK).
When the strongest, of course The first 1.5K native resolution "Yuanshen" support in the middle end 。
However, this is obviously for the "combustion mode" with heat dissipation clip, but at a glance, I have to say that 1.5K AI super score is useful, but in front of the original 1.5K, it is really just a bad brother
(room temperature 25.6 degrees, 200 nit screen brightness)
The real GT Neo6 is 47.2 degrees in 3DMark toaster. The absolute performance output is the strongest among several competing products, but the temperature control is the most conservative, resulting in average stability performance ↑
The test stability of 3DMark Solar Bay is 57.9%, that of Wild Life Extreme Ulimited is 51.3%, and that of Wild Life Ulimited is 49.9%.
The performance scheduling mode of Real GT Neo6 is completely the same as that of Real GT Neo6 SE This scheduling is very suitable for upper cooling back clamp when the temperature control wall is bumped.
Similarly, after 20 minutes of "Elite of Peace" HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing at a room temperature of 26.1 degrees at 200 nits, the highest temperature of the real GT Neo6 is 36.3 degrees.
Eating chicken is obviously specially adjusted, which is very cool, and is more than 1 degree lower than competitive products and Neo6 SE.
(Endurance test: the test environment is 26.1 degrees of room temperature, 200 nits of screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%. It includes 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surf, a total of 2.5 hours)
GT Neo6 of Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, The endurance performance is not very different from the real GT Neo6 SE of Snapdragon 7+Gen 3, but the same.
The real 11V 11A 120W fast charging scheme, The current is not as exaggerated as the previous 150W (11V 13.7A) of the True Self/OnePlus, nor as large as the 240W fast charging current of the 20V 12A of the True Self GT5.
But we Several existing instruments have not been adapted and have hit the current protection wall, resulting in the peak power not going up ↑
The peak value at the socket end is 103W, excluding the loss of the charging head and cable, It is estimated that the power of the mobile phone is between 83W and 93W.
(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo ultra fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent ultra fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low-power charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default, and need to turn them on manually)
The real GT Neo6 is a 5500mAh dual cell+120W fast charge, with a SUPERVAC S power management chip.
In fact, it can enter the official standard, charging 50% in 10 minutes, but in fact, the real GT Neo6 SE can also do it. It takes 24 minutes for the real GT Neo6 to fully charge, 3 minutes faster than its own 100W fast charge, more powerful than vivo's 120W, and slightly better than Redmi's 120W (the real GT Neo6 has a larger battery capacity).
(Although the peak power is limited due to the current wall of the test instrument, the mobile phone displays 100% of the time for 24 minutes)
However, the 120W fast charge has no advantages in the initial stage of charging, but has obvious advantages in the middle and later stages. The answer lies in the power range ↑ of the two fast charging schemes
The main power ranges of the Genuine GT Neo6 are 72W, 64W (the second longest range, 5 minutes), 55W (the longest range, 10 minutes) and 46W.
The peak value of the real Neo6 SE is 79.7W, but the high power range is around 40W (13 minutes).
Although the peak charging power and peak holding time of the Genuine GT Neo6 did not meet the expectations, the higher charging power of the middle and rear end actually has greater gain for daily use. After all, the limiting power is only available when the battery is out of charge
Photo comparison
For the camera part, the real GT Neo6 is still a familiar LYT-600+IMX355 two-piece set:
Front 3200W, IMX615，0.8μm， 1/2.74 type, F2.45 (green factory system is often used from Find X5 and One Plus 10 Pro)
Main camera 5000W, LYT-600 (i.e. IMX882), 1/1.95 type, 0.8 μ m, OIS+F1.88， Equivalent 25.6mm, 5P lens
Ultra wide angle 800W, IMX355，1.12μm， 1/4 type, F2.2, 5P lens
This time, we found the real GT Neo6 SE and the Redmi Turbo 3 Challenge Arena with the best lens configuration of LYT-600.
PS： The world only knows that we work at Shenzhen Bay No. 1, but most people do not know that there are large construction sites around Shenzhen Bay No. 1
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central right magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 5, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 6, global and central amplification
Main camera, 2x, high pixel mode comparison
Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
"2x" contrast 1, central magnification
High pixel mode contrast 1, central amplification (not the phone shot is crooked, this is really a Shenzhen style road)
High pixel mode contrast 1, center right magnification
Main camera contrast 2, global and central amplification
"2x" contrast 2, central magnification
Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification
"2x" contrast 4, central magnification
Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification
"2x" vs. 5, central magnification
Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 7, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 8, global and central amplification
The actual performance and photographic experience of the real GT Neo6 and the real GT Neo6 SE are very similar (nonsense). The ISP of Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and Snapdragon 7+Gen 3 should be the same.
summary
Real GT Neo6, The provincial flow is the top screen and the strongest fast charging in the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3/Snapdragon 7+Gen 3 models.
The funny thing is that the real GT Neo6 is the only Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 model with dual band GPS.
The original Snapdragon 7+Gen 3 is a dual frequency GPS, but the other three Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 models from friends are all single frequency GPS
(At the press conference, it also mentioned the proportion of screen costs, which is quite novel ↑. Here, A should be Redmi Turbo 3, and B should be iQOO Z9 Turbo)
In addition to the moto X50 Ultra that has not yet been released, the real GT Neo6 is the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 model with the highest configuration, but its price is also the highest at present.
The Genuine GT Neo6 has higher peak performance and higher fast charging output in the middle and rear segments, but the initial price of the Neo6 SE in the same ratio is 200 to 300 yuan more expensive, and the price difference will be slightly smaller after deducting the first sent earphones and customized phone cases.
The conclusion is that, Now the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3/Snapdragon 7+Gen 3 model with the highest physical cost performance ratio is still the real GT Neo6 SE. The old Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is still very fragrant.
Even if the real person is as fierce as "realmi", there will be a price difference just by changing the chip (fast charging cost should not be much difference). 8s and 7+are inferior to hardware optical tracking and peripheral configuration, but the pricing should be inferior. Betting on Dragon 7+Gen 3 is the right bet.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
