"Black sheep" from 1599 yuan! True 12 Pro+evaluation: 3x periscope OV64B+IMX890+Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Love Computer

The True Self 12 Pro+was released on February 27, 2004. It is not only the cheapest periscope telephoto phone, but also the IMX890 and IP65. It is not even the tactical starting price of 8+128, but the 1599 of 8+256.

Because of this 1599, we still choose to make 12 Pro+real first when the Find X7 Ultra and Xiaomi 14 Ultra tests are difficult to produce.

The core of this evaluation is to see the performance of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, as well as the performance of thousand yuan IMX890 and periscope OV64B telephoto.

True 12 Pro+(RMX3840) is a Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 with 3394mm ² VC soaking plate, 5000mAh battery+67W fast charge.

Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (the second generation Snapdragon 7s), model SM7435-AB, Samsung 4nm process, CPU is four 2.4GHz A78+four 1.96GHz A55, Adreno 710 @ 940MHz, supporting up to 3200MHz LPDDR5 memory and UFS 4.0 flash memory, X62 5G baseband (released on September 15, 23, the first release of Redmi Note 13 Pro)

The 6.7 inch 120Hz 2412 × 1080 OLED curved screen provided by Tianma alone, full white 800 nits, local peak brightness 950 nits, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming+240Hz touch sampling rate, instantaneous peak 2000Hz.

Front 3200W, IMX615, 0.8 μ m. F2.4, 5P lens (real 11 Pro+/GT2 Pro/GT5 Pro, one plus 10 Pro/one plus 12 the same model)
Main camera 5000W, IMX890, 1/1.56 type, 1 μ m. OIS, F1.8, equivalent 24mm (5.59mm), 6P lens
800W, Hynix Hi846W, 1.125 μ m. F2.2, equivalent 16mm (1.66mm), 5P lens
Triple periscope macro telephoto, 6400W, OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 type, F2.6+OIS, 4P lens, equivalent 71mm (13.3mm)

161.47x74.02x8.75mm, 196g weight. Plastic middle frame+plain leather back cover, upper Raytheon 1012+lower Raytheon 1519 two in one acoustic motor, low position short focus optical fingerprint, with IP65 protection.

True 12 Pro+debuted 8+256 version at 1599 yuan, 12+256 version at 1799 yuan, and 12+512 version at 1999 yuan.

True 12 Pro and True 12 Pro+are mainly different in chip, main camera and telephoto specifications. The difference in the price of the first launch is only 100 yuan. I believe you Yanzu, the whole consideration process does not need 1 millisecond.

Appearance&Workmanship&Hand&Fingerprint Identification&External Release&Vibration

OPPO Find X7, 12 Pro+, GT5 Pro ↑

The appearance of the "True 12 Pro+" is not good. In addition, the texture does exist. The circle around the camera is still metal. The camera looks juicy, but the details are the real GT5 Pro (especially in the camera circle).

The technological nano skin at the same level as Xiaomi 14 Ultra (its wear resistance is stronger than Xiaomi 14 and weaker than Xiaomi 14 Ultra) has greater friction than normal plain skin.
The gap of the plastic middle frame is well controlled. The plastic washer at the edge of the science and technology nano leather is too thin to be detected. The keys are a little empty and feel comfortable.
Low position short focus optical fingerprint
The dual speakers are "Shangruisheng 1012+Xiaruisheng 1519 two in one acoustic motor". Up to now, only Redmi Note 13 Pro+and it are the same scheme. The volume and sound quality of the lower speaker is much higher than that of the upper speaker, and the sound field is obviously to the right when you hold it horizontally. The volume and sound quality are OK, even better than X100.
The Raytheon 1519 two in one acoustic motor has the same level of vibration as the 0809 X-axis motor, with average strength and tightness.
No infrared, IP65.

The peripheral configuration is nothing special, but the real 12 Pro+is extremely superior, disobeys its ancestors, and has added the 49W level 5A PPS high current fast charging support (while the laptop PD charging heads running all over the street usually run in the 27W gear when connected).

How much is this against our ancestors? Even the real GT5 Pro doesn't have a 49W PPS

Objective test: screen&endurance&charging

(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)

True 12 Pro+is a 6.7 inch 120Hz central perforated curved screen OLED provided by Tianma, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming+240Hz touch sampling rate. 2412 × 1080, full white 800 nits, local peak 950 nits.

The actual performance of the 12 Pro+screen, It is at the same level as OPPO K11, and weaker than the price of friends near Redmi Note 12 Turbo 。 The color accuracy is remarkable, mainly due to the low peak brightness.

It's not all bad news that the screen is not new enough. Because it is not 8T LTPO, the high brightness is more eye friendly DC dimming ↑ (default is, nothing needs to be adjusted). With the low brightness 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, God helps me.

(Endurance test: the test environment is 23.7 degrees of room temperature, 200 nits of screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%. It includes 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR high-definition+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surf, a total of 2.5 hours)

With the combination of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and 1080P screens, the 5000mAh single cell of True 12 Pro+(Xinwangda+Dongguan Liwei), The endurance performance is close to that of the previous generation and Redmi Note 13 Pro+, and there is an obvious gap between the current flagship and the current flagship.

The main reason is that the performance is weak. The game should be fully fired, which reduces the overall endurance performance.

The peak charging power of True 12 Pro+is 57.5W.

(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo super fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent super fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low power fast charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default and need to turn them on manually)

5000mAh single cell+67W fast charge, 100% is displayed in 49 minutes, and the charge is cut off in 56 minutes.

The performance of 67W is slightly weaker than that of friends, and certainly not as good as that of 100W of the previous generation of Zhenwo 11 Pro+(after all, there is an extra periscope telephoto, and the battery, internal space, and cost are not allowed to charge 100W fast).

But I didn't play cards according to the routine this time, 49W level 5A PPS high current fast charge compatibility (Use notebook PD charging head running all over the street, generally running in 27W gear).

Even if it is a 67W fast charging head, the main charging range of Zhenwo 12 Pro+is about 30W to 35W, so even if it uses PPS fast charging, it will not be much slower than the official charging head.

Both Blue Factory and Green Factory have made high power PPS compatible, and the rest of our friends will hurry up, so we won't name names.

Performance: Is Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 enough?

True 12 Pro+is Snapdragon 7s Gen 23394mm ² VC soaking plate, LPDDR4x memory+UFS 3.1 flash memory.

In order to easily understand its CPU and GPU performance, this comparison table is billion long.

CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger) ↓

With Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 as the baseline, the CPU gap between it and each SoC ↓

With Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 as the baseline, the CPU multiple difference between it and each SoC ↓

GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger) ↓

With Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 as the baseline, the GPU gap between it and each SoC ↓

With Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 as the baseline, the GPU multiple difference between it and each SoC ↓

Flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar of each column, the stronger) ↓

The read-write performance of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is at the same level as Tianji 8100/8200, which is a little better than Snapdragon 870.

CPU performance of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 It is the same level as Snapdragon 778G, slightly weaker than Snapdragon 778G+and Snapdragon 782G (about 5% weaker), but stronger than Tianji 7200 Ultra (more than 10% stronger).

On the GPU side, The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is slightly weaker than the Snapdragon 778G (about 10% weaker), and more than 50% lower than the GPU partial graduate Tianji 7200 Ultra, This directly leads to that the game performance of True 12 Pro+cannot match that of Redmi Note 13 Pro+.

The scale of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2's GPU is too environmentally friendly, and the peak power consumption of single baking GPU is only 4.8W (stable at 3.1W). The GPU generates heat, not to mention Android phones, The iPhone is easy to press.

The CPU single baking peak value is 7.8W (stabilized at 6W finally), the heat load of the whole machine is about 5.7W, and the peak temperature is 47.5 degrees.

(room temperature 23.7 degrees, 200 nit screen brightness)

Since Snapdragon 7+Gen 2 cannot run the light pursuit test, there are only two stability tests.

Because the GPU power consumption is "too low", the 3DMark runs stably close to 100%, and the body is slightly warm

In the same environment, after 20 minutes of Elite of Peace HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing, the maximum temperature is 38.7 degrees.

Unless you play games all day long Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is a better SoC than Tianji 7200 Ultra In addition, the Qualcomm platform does not take any training.

With qualified CPU performance, its daily response speed is significantly higher than that of a large number of dual core CPU models (Tianji 7200/7050/1080/920/900/800/720, etc.), so I dare to add enough system animation to it. The smoothness is actually good.

In terms of the system, there is nothing to say. There is the latest realme UI 5.0. Its functions are not very different from ColorOS 14, but identical.

The black screen unlocking has not been added like the green factory's new machine (black screen unlocking means that it can be unlocked directly without waiting for the fingerprint pattern to light up). There is an additional setting of "draw on the desktop to enter the news page", and the switch is actually closed in the "desktop mode" (long press on the desktop - more - desktop and lock the screen), instead of playing cards according to the routine.

photograph

The image algorithm of True Self 12 Pro+is claimed to run in RAW domain like the flagship:

Front 3200W, IMX615, 0.8 μ m. F2.4, 5P lens (real 11 Pro+/GT2 Pro/GT5 Pro, one plus 10 Pro/one plus 12 the same model)
Main camera 5000W, IMX890, 1/1.56 type, 1 μ m. OIS, F1.8, equivalent 24mm (5.59mm), 6P lens
800W, Hynix Hi846W, 1.125 μ m. F2.2, equivalent 16mm (1.66mm), 5P lens
Triple periscope macro telephoto, 6400W, OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 type, F2.6+OIS, 4P lens, equivalent 71mm (13.3mm)

For science popularization, the vivo/iQOO, OPPO/One Plus/True Self three times the 70mm equivalent of F2.6 are the second-generation large aperture+macro scheme, and their availability is significantly higher than those of the "85/90mm+F3.3/F3.5" OV64B periscope telephotos (see Huawei P50 Pro, Mate 50 Pro, vivo X90 Pro+, ZTE/Nubia Z50/Z60 series and other models).

So this time, the opponent who took a photo of the real me 12 Pro+, leapfrog into 4000 yuan Find X7, 5000 yuan Xiaomi 14 Pro and iQOO 12 Pro 。

Its camera configuration is similar to that of the Reno10 Pro+, which was released in May of the previous year and started at 3899 yuan. For the 1599, the luxury has run out of steam, seriously exceeding the nearby price range (the same level is generally OV64B's OIS main camera+800W tactical ultra wide angle), and also significantly exceeding the previous generation and Redmi Note 13 Pro+models with 200 million pixels of HP3.

A 1599 mobile phone has a telephoto that is better than some flagship Android phones starting at 4999 yuan and the iPhone 15 Pro starting at 7999 yuan. I suddenly feel that the world is beginning to be a bit abstract.

The shutter response speed of True Self 12 Pro+is slow, No real zero delay shutter , click the shutter and move immediately, there will be a risk of pasting (of course, not as exaggerated as Meizu mobile phones).

but 10 times of telephoto, there is an "automatic locking" function similar to Samsung The shooting is very stable, which is a feature that most Xiaomi, vivo and OPPO flagship do not have. No kidding, I really don't follow the routine.

(The zero delay shutter is that after the camera is opened, it is actually taking pictures all the time, but only after clicking the shutter, it sends the previous photos to the algorithm for synthesis).

Before starting the wave, I first mentioned the problem of "sandwich". Now when the mobile phone presses the shutter continuously, some samples will be directly output without time for algorithm processing. Basically, all advanced models have this problem, but it is different in degree.

True 12 Pro+uses the ISP of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 to strengthen the higher-order algorithm in RAW domain, and multi frame composition is extremely active. Three shots can be pulled to the slow shutter of 2 seconds in dark light, so you can often feel the performance limitations of ISP, which also leads to the "sandwich" phenomenon of True 12 Pro+more obvious than the flagship.

The sandwiched birth control of the main camera is good, but generally three consecutive pictures of ultra wide angle and telephoto will start sandwiched birth , artificial extra rest time is needed.

So if you see that the online evaluation of the 12 Pro+photo is very different, it may be that you encounter users with different shooting habits (especially the difference in the speed of clicking the shutter), which leads to a huge difference in the photo effects ↓

Subjective contrast

Main camera contrast 1, global and central shading part amplification

Main camera 2 times cutting contrast 1

The main camera has 2 times of cutting contrast 2, and the global and central shading parts are enlarged

Main camera contrast 2, global and central shading part amplification

Main camera contrast 3, the global and central shading parts are enlarged

Main camera contrast 4, the global and central shading parts are enlarged

The main camera is compared with 5, and the global and central shading parts are enlarged

Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast

Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast 5

Ultra wide angle contrast 6, global and central amplification

Telephoto contrast

Long focus contrast 1, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 1, 6 times, magnification

Long focus contrast 1, 10 times, magnification

Long focus contrast 2, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 2, 10 times, magnification

Long focus contrast 3, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 3, 6 times magnification

Long focus contrast 4, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 4, 6 times magnification

Long focus contrast 5, global and central magnification (the false color problem of the Xiaomi 14 Pro scene has existed for several months, but it has not been solved yet)

Long focus contrast 5, 10 times, magnification

Long focus contrast 6, 6 times, magnification

Long focus contrast 7, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 8, global and central amplification

Long focus contrast 9, dim light, 3x magnification

The HDR of True Self 12 Pro+does not pursue eye striking light and shade changes like the flagship. The dynamic range is weaker, and the picture will be flatter, but it also protects the exposure of dark parts (except for ultra wide angles that are not allowed by the ability).

tactics Super wide-angle After all, the specifications are really poor. Once there is no HDR/night view mode, it will become a mess without evaluation (only when you are in the middle of life can you see its real strength without multiple frames).
Subjective aspect No kidding, these 1/1.56 sensors of IMX890/766 are just a threshold, and they will not be thrown away by the big bottoms of OV50H and LYT-808 in the daytime. The double cutting is better than the LTY-808 of my eldest brother, which is totally unexpected... But there is no way to deal with the lighting and weak light scenes.
and long-focus It tells us that a lean camel is bigger than a horse, and a phoenix tail is stronger than a chicken head. Even the periscope telephoto on the 1000 yuan plane wins the flagship standing telephoto. The OV64B periscope telephoto of the True 12 Pro+can't beat the Find X7 and iQOO 12 Pro, but can beat the JN1 upright telephoto of the Xiaomi 14 Pro. In addition, it can also be triggered in weak light, and retains the macro function of about 25cm. It is also very easy to shoot near objects and people.
But the 6x and 10x algorithm effects of the current firmware of True Self 12 Pro+are really over sharpening+negative optimization, just like using 3x direct interpolation, which is actually not as good as a half baked sample... I hope OTA can do it later, if not, it will have to wait for the migration of Google camera.

Don't say anything if you can compete with a 4000 level flagship, True 12 Pro+is the most powerful new machine for comprehensive photography below 3000 yuan (excluding ultra wide angle) 。 After one more periscopic telephoto with a macro, it is really not comparable to the previous generation and peers.

Previously, entry-level video phones could not afford a telephoto, so the 200 million pixel HP3 was used as a telephoto. Now, the real 12 Pro+not only has a telephoto, but also skips the vertical telephoto, and uses the second-generation large aperture macro OV64B. If it can lose, it will be a ghost.

summary

Both Redmi and True Self are working on a rudimentary image specific model, True 12 Pro+, Redmi Note 13 Pro series and OPPO K11 are all for users who "care more about taking photos than performance" (It would be very sad if all the cameras below 2000 yuan were QR code cameras.). In terms of performance, both Zhenwo and Redmi have Snapdragon 7+Gen 2 cost-effective models.

Those users who say that "the performance of Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 can not sustain life" and those who say that "the current flagship performance is excessive" are just two extremes.

The bottom line of our Shenzhen Bay No.1 owner's opinion is that those dual core+6 small core CPUs are "really unable to sustain life, we need to see the face of WeChat to build machines, and we will get Kakasi next year". Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 just crossed this performance pass line.

Of course, if you add 500, you can change it to Snapdragon 7+Gen 2, or even Snapdragon 870, you will be killed directly. Unfortunately, it is not good.

True 12 Pro+is the result of extreme knife method and "black sheep" stacking: remove infrared, press the charge to 67W, use the previous 1080P+OLED music screen, Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, etc The cost saved is all added to the second generation OV64B 3 times periscope telephoto and IMX890 main camera 。

I even took the time to plug two colored eggs, IP65 and 49W 5A PPS fast charging. It really made me cry (high brightness DC dimming, forced to count half of the eggs).

The performance price ratio of the True Self 12 Pro+in the image is more excessive than that of the True Self GT5 Pro. When we took photos to compare the attendance of Xiaomi 14 Pro and iQOO 12 Pro, as the representative of 1599 yuan, it had already won.

The moment the press conference saw 1599 yuan, I said it sounded when it was blown up. I'm not familiar with those friends and businessmen 12 Pro+seems to coincide with the first generation of Xiaomi, Xiaomi is authentic!

Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer

Follow our WeChat official account: playphone

Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer