Xiaomi 13 Ultra has been released for one month, and there has been no OTA for 10 days since vivo X90 Pro+released Demo X new tone. After the flagship images are basically finalized, let's now take a look at Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs. OPPO Find X6 Pro, vivo X90 Pro+, and Xiaomi 12S Ultra.
This time, nearly 4800 samples and 50 scenes were also shot, and the final spliced comparison pictures exceeded 200, which may be the most comparison scenes in the whole network. There are a lot of photos, so please bear with it.
The conclusion is unified at the end, and the sample is more enjoyable!!!!
PS： In order to easily see the difference on all major platforms, including WeChat (Android WeChat will compress the photos to 1080 pixels horizontally), the magnification of the center of the sample is increased to 500%, and it should be able to divide the height without clicking on the so-called "big picture" of WeChat.
PSS： Xiaomi uses Leica Vivid mode, vivo uses the default Vivid mode, and OPPO is automatic mode. All focus points are in the center of the picture, and all proofs are arranged according to global+central magnification.
PSSS： All the samples this time have been uploaded to the online disk. Interested readers can download them and count their hair. The link is: , extraction code: igao
PSSSS： If you are interested in the OV flagship and Samsung S23 Ultra, you can compare the previous photos, "Flagship Duel, OPPO Find X6 Pro, vivo X90 Pro+, Samsung S23 Ultra, Xiaomi 12S Ultra Photo Review"
To sum up, among the latest three image flagship Xiaomi/OPPO/vivo, the sub camera specification of Xiaomi 13 Ultra is the weakest.
Xiaomi 13 Ultra has replaced all sub cameras with smaller IMX858 at one go. The area is 80% of the previous generation ultra wide angle/5 times telephoto IMX586, and 49% of the OPPO telephoto IMX890. IMX858 improves dark light noise reduction and focusing performance at the expense of full pixel output details.
As compensation, the ultra wide angle is upgraded to F1.8 aperture+a larger equivalent 12mm (122 degree) lens. Like Huawei, the lens is used to compensate for sensor disadvantages.
3.2 times longer focal length is added, and its physical power is 2.6 times, about 60 mm equivalent. The actual magnification is smaller than 2.7 times of IMPO IMX890.
The actual equivalent focal length of 5 times long focal length is 117mm, which is still sufficient.
The main camera has an F1.9/F4 two gear variable aperture (to improve close-up performance). In automatic mode, the call frequency of F4 aperture is extremely low. In this photo comparison, the main camera did not shoot near objects, so it was not triggered at all.
When the beep is over, we let the proof sheet "talk" by itself.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification
Upper right corner edge
Bottom left corner edge
(Xiaomi 13 Ultra, a super wide-angle lens with large viewing angle and aperture, has OK edge control, even better than the previous generation)
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, dark part (both Xiaomi and OPPO pressed the dark part too much)
Ultra wide angle contrast 5, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 6
Ultra Wide Angle Comparison 7
Ultra wide angle contrast 8, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 8, highlight
Ultra wide angle contrast 9, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 10
Super wide angle contrast 11, overall and central amplification (highlight, and turn the face of God of Wealth green)
Ultra wide angle contrast 12, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 13, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 14, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 15, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 15, upper right corner edge
Long focus: 3.2/3.5x, 5x and 10x
The telephoto magnification of several machines is quite different. Here we are considerate of the old comrade vivo X90 Pro+and let it use 3.5 times of the original focal section, while the others are all 3.2 times unified (it turns out that it is unfair to other machines...)
First insert a portrait mode shoot ↓ (Xiaomi 12S Ultra can only use the main camera, the rest are all telephotos)
Portrait Mode Take Flowers ↑
Long focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
5x contrast 1, the center and the left side of the center are enlarged
Long focus contrast 2, global and central amplification
5x contrast 2, central magnification
Long focus contrast 3, global and central amplification
5x contrast 3, central magnification
Long focus contrast 4, global and central amplification
5x contrast 4, central magnification
5x vs. 5, global and central amplification
10x contrast 5, central magnification
Long focus contrast 5, global and central amplification
Long focus contrast 6, global and central amplification
Long focus contrast 7, global and central amplification
Long focus contrast 8, global and central amplification
5x contrast 8, central magnification
Long focus contrast 9, global and central amplification
5x vs. 9, central magnification (no kidding, Xiaomi 12SU jumps too obviously at 5x)
Long focus contrast 10, global and central amplification
5x contrast 10, the center and the left side of the center are magnified
Long focus contrast 11, central amplification
5x contrast 11, central magnification
Long focus contrast 12, global and central amplification
Long focus contrast 13, global and central amplification
5x contrast 13, zoom in at the center and above the center
Long focus contrast 14, global and central amplification
5x vs. 14, central magnification
Long focus contrast 15, global and central amplification
5x vs. 15, central magnification
5x contrast 15, zoom in on the left side of the center
2x "zoom" contrast
Apart from the vivo X90 Pro+, which has a physical focal length of twice (triggered in the daytime and under strong light), the others are all cut twice as much as the IMX989.
2x "zoom" contrast 1, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 2, global and central magnification
The X90 Pro+'s IMX758 has a physical 2x zoom, which is not better than the IMX989's 2x zoom... But when you think about it, the IMX758 is only 1.4 after four in one μ M (aperture is also pulled to F1.6), IMX989 single pixel is 1.6 μ M
Double "zoom" contrast 2, global and central amplification (X90 Pro+'s double telephoto has the problem of decreasing dark saturation)
Double "zoom" contrast 3, global and central amplification (or saturation)
2x "zoom" contrast 4, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 5, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 6, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 7
2x "zoom" contrast 8, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 9, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 10, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 11, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 12, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 13, global and central magnification
2x "zoom" contrast 14, left central magnification
Subjective contrast
Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 2, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 7, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 8, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 9, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 10
Main camera contrast 11 (the actual environment is a little darker than that of Xiaomi 12SU, but none of them can be restored successfully)
Main camera contrast 11, global and central amplification
Focus contrast 12, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 13, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 14, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 15
Main camera contrast 16, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 17
Main camera contrast 18, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 19, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 20, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 21
Main camera contrast 22
Main camera contrast 23, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 24, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 25, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 26
Main camera contrast 27
The main camera contrast is 28, and the overall and central magnification (embarrassed, the red color of the two Xiaomi is biased)
Main camera contrast 29, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 30, global and central amplification
Extremely weak light, subjective contrast, global and central amplification
summary
After rolling to the 1-inch IMX989, the difference between the main photographers was unexpectedly small, mainly due to the different tones of the films. The main camera will not be discussed in detail below, because the battlefield has been transferred to the secondary camera.
The weakest of several 1-inch flagship ships is undoubtedly one year old Xiaomi 12S Ultra 。 Now look back, how did Xiaomi have the heart to not add a triple telephoto between 1 and 5 times? It's too bad that there is no lens relay in the middle focal section. In 2020, the IMX586, which is 5 times the size of Xiaomi 10 Ultra in use, is still stronger than Xiaomi 13 Ultra in the daytime, but the amount of light entering the light/weak light scene is insufficient, and it will be exceeded by the smaller base that exceeds Xiaomi 13U. Although the main camera's hardware is very close to the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (the variable aperture will not trigger), its algorithm is not as good as the new one.
The penultimate is vivo X90 Pro+ 。 This row, It's the experience of taking pictures, not the effect of imaging 。 Vivo still has many problems, such as the sense of oil painting of violent multi frame synthesis, the dark part of violent brightening, the negative optimization of ultra wide angle ancestral details, and the obvious synthetic artifacts of moving objects. The new firmware also has an algorithm purple edge problem. However, face detection, highlight suppression, night scene film rate are still invincible, and there is also a stronger 2x digital zoom.
Ultra wide angle is not good enough. The rate of 3.5x telephoto is obviously low, but as long as it doesn't shake, the effect is still good. The most embarrassing thing is the 2x physical telephoto, which can only be used when the light is good, but the ultimate discrimination is not as good as IMX989 cutting, and there is a problem that the saturation of the dark part decreases (after all, IMX758 is only 1.4 after four in one μ m. The single pixel of IMX989 is 1.6 μ M) - X90 Pro+is 2 times better than the friend, not because it has physical 2 times (daytime proof), but because vivo's main camera 2 times zoom algorithm is better (night proof).
The huge deduction came from the OTA on May 10 (version number 20.79, after adding Demo X color style), which made the X90 Pro+photography experience significantly reverse. Guowei even thought that the camera was broken. In the past, the photography experience of the Blue Factory was inferior to that of the peers. The new firmware reminds me of the shooting clarity and photography experience of Huawei Mate 40 Pro in 2020. Please note when reversing:
Pressing the shutter quickly and continuously will stop the response of the shutter for several seconds, and basically say goodbye to capturing (only 20 shots are taken in a row when the shutter is pressed for a long time). As a result, the "sandwich" of continuous shooting is more serious (there are unprocessed samples output), and even the X70 Pro+bug of outputting the shrinkage chart before it can be processed in the current year has reoccurred. Slow photo response (longer multi frame synthesis), other mobile phones have taken 2 or 3 rounds, and vivo is still circling. During the test for several hours, the camera got stuck twice (unless you like the tone of the dimming part of Demo X, it is recommended to upgrade after the firmware is stable).
Comprehensive ranking, I will Xiaomi 13 Ultra and Find X6 Pro are ranked in the top two, and the ranking is forced to be in no particular order (if the old firmware is used, X90 Pro+can also be counted as 50%) Xiaomi is easy to produce films with tones, and the focus section covers a wide area. OPPO is 0.6 to 3 times stronger, plus excellent portrait effect.
OPPO Find X6 Pro The main problems are still more than 5 times weaker than that of friends, the high light cannot be suppressed, the ultra wide-angle field of vision is too small, and the power consumption of photography is too high (although it has been improved). Also, about 1200 photos were taken. The Find X6 Pro was powered down 50%, and the Xiaomi 13 Ultra was powered down 30%. After OTA obviously corrected the sharpening problem at the end of April, I was quite satisfied with OPPO (the 2x zoom algorithm was still common). Although it was not easy to please, I also liked the dimming part, but the photometry was close to the naked eye, and was relatively faithful to restoration. The photo taking experience is better than that of Xiaomi. The HDR film rate is high, and there is no obvious difference between the sample and the manufacturer. The core advantage is that the ultra wide angle is obviously better than that of friends, and the dark light performance of the triple focus section is very strong with the portrait.
Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Compared with the previous generation, ultra wide angle retrogression (linked light metering is easy to make dark areas dark, the small bottom can not hold a large field of vision, and the details are not good), 5 times of telephoto retrogression in the daytime (but the new algorithm can reverse the advanced generation in weak light), the portrait mode still cannot catch up with friends, 3.2 times of telephoto (2.6 times of physics) is significantly weaker than vivo/OPPO, and has also castrated the macro of 13 Pro, However, compared with Xiaomi 12SU, it is indeed a "zero breakthrough" in Zhongjiao. In addition, almost all the others have been improved: the sharpness/smoothness of multi focus segment shooting has been improved, the main photography algorithm has made a small progress, more than 5 times stronger than OV, the multi shot consistency is good, and Leica's tone lighting control is really good.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
