Vivo Pad2 was released on April 20. The provincial stream is Tianji 9000, a 2.8K screen with a 12.1 inch 7:5 screen, and the initial launch starts at 2399 yuan (version 8+128). Let's take a look at its actual performance and compare it with OPPO Pad 2. Finally, we will make a peer panel analysis Love to play computer games It is recommended for the tablet in April.
PS： The panel analysis in April is at the end
Vivo Pad2 (12.1 inch 7:5 screen), Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro (11 inch 15.3: 10 screen)
this time In contrast, there is no Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro: because it is not in line with the vivo Pad2/OPPO Pad 2, it cannot be considered as a counterpart product.
The moment we unpacked the Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro and picked up the real machine, we gave up. The size and weight of the screen is a bigger difference, which has a much greater impact than the performance gap between Tianji 9000 and Snapdragon 8+.
The Xiaomi tablet 6 Pro 11 inch screen, screen plastic bracket and body texture, together with its own Redmi Pad (10.6 inch 15:9 screen), can't even recognize which is the flagship at a glance.
Its starting price is from 2399 yuan (version 8+128, the same as the vivo Pad2). Each configuration is 100 yuan cheaper than the vivo Pad2. Even so, we recommend vivo for the same capacity.
If you mainly want to use it to watch videos, we recommend reducing the cost of Xiaomi Tablet 6 or the previous generation. The Miban 6 Pro is now a bit like the K60 Pro - buy SoC and give away tablets/mobile phones.
Xiaomi's real flagship tablet should be the successor of Xiaomi's 5 Pro 12.4-inch version, which was previously disclosed as the Xiaomi tablet with 10000mAh battery (Xiaomi's 6 Ultra?).
Specifications
Three color combinations: Yuanshan Grey, Sunny Sea Blue and Nebula Purple, integrated aluminum alloy body, 266.03 × 191.6 × 6.59mm, 585g
Tianji 9000, LPDDR5 memory+UFS 3.1 flash memory. 10000mAh battery+44W fast charge (full charge in 139 minutes)
12.1 inch 144Hz 2800x1968 LCD screen, provided by Tianma alone, the highest touch sampling rate is 180Hz (at 90Hz refresh rate), and the peak value is 600 nits. The ratio is a rare 7:5 like OPPO Pad 2 (thanks to being a good brother!)
6 speakers (4 full frequency+2 tweeters), with a total output power consumption of 6W. USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps) and supports 4K 60Hz DP output and 5W OTG reverse charging.
Front 800W (HI846, 1.12 μ m, F2.0), main 1300W (HI1336, 1.12 μ m, F2.2) and 200W tactical macro (OV02B).
The first launch of the 8+128 version of vivo Pad2 is 2399 yuan, the 8+256 version is 2799 yuan, the 12+256 version is 3099 yuan, and the 12+512 version is 3399 yuan.
Appearance and accessories
Vivo Pad2 also uses leather embossed packaging similar to vivo X Fold2. This generation of Bigger is enough.
The original charging head is 44W V4440L0B1-CN, with 10W, 18W (9V 2A) and 44W (11V 4A) output. Dongguan Dahong OEM.
The top is 200W tactical macro, the bottom is the main camera, and the right is the flash ↑
It is even the same as OPPO Pad 2: Port C is not centered. He really, I cry to death.
One piece aluminum alloy body, no plastic support, workmanship OK (but weaker than iPad and OPPO Pad 2).
The screen is slightly higher than the border, and it will be very dangerous when it falls. Compared with the official rimless protective cover, it is more recommended to buy the traditional rimmed protective cover.
Blue factory "round sky and place" family camera design, 3 pin contacts at the bottom of the back are used to power the keyboard cover (actually, the keyboard is connected with Bluetooth).
feel: 266.03 × 191.6 × 6.59mm, 585g, right angle frame. Do you still need to say how it feels? It can only be said that holding it will have a good exercise effect.
External release : Symmetrical 6 speakers with a total output of 6 watts (4 full frequency+2 tweeters), 2/3 volume is the maximum volume level of a normal mobile phone, the limit volume is large, and the sound field is in the middle. The overall sound quality is better than that of OPPO Pad 2 and iPad Air 5 (we don't need to know that), but it does not meet our expectations for the 6W 6 speakers, which is obviously not as amazing as the 8 speakers of Xiaomi 5 Pro. The voice of vivo Pad2 is excellent, but the low frequency is weaker than expected, and the high frequency is too strong.
Face unlocking: The speed is outrageous. People often raise their hands to light the screen and unlock it. Others think you haven't locked the screen. However, the front wide-angle is not large enough, and the tablet cannot be unlocked as easily as OPPO Pad 2 when it is placed flat on the desktop. You need to keep your head close to the camera. And the hand lift is not sensitive enough.
Like a normal plate, there is no solid fingerprint No vibration motor , None GPS . It can be understood without a motor and GPS (OPPO Pad 2 of USB 2.0 has a GPS left), but this year, only Xiaomi Tablet 6 series has physical fingerprints on several domestic tablets in blue, green and orange, "I really don't think you are there".
yes USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbps) and supports 4K 60Hz DP video output, with 5W OTG reverse charging.
In the upper right corner of the screen (in horizontal screen) NFC label , used for touch to touch transmission of vivo/iQOO mobile phones. The machine itself does not support NFC reading and writing.
Objective test: screen&performance&endurance&charging
Vivo Pad2 is a 12.1 inch 144Hz 2800x1968 LCD screen with a peak value of 600 nits, which is provided by Tianma alone.
In the actual test, under the 144Hz refresh rate mode, the touch sampling rate seems to be 120Hz (true ancestor method). The official standard's maximum 180Hz touch sampling rate is the data at 90Hz refresh rate, but the system only has three options: 60Hz, 144Hz and adaptive
In the default standard mode of vivo Pad2, the local brightness and excitation brightness are about 485 nits, which are normal for the flagship tablet, but slightly lower than OPPO Pad2.
At the highest brightness, the four corner brightness is 445/431/442/429 respectively, with a difference of 59 nits, and the uniformity is average.
The contrast of 100 nits and the highest brightness is 1227:1 and 1212:1 respectively, and the LCD screen is normal.
The most prominent feature of the vivo Pad2 screen is its color accuracy, The screen has complete color calibration, the system can automatically switch the color gamut according to the content, and the P3 color accuracy of the standard mode (default mode) and the sRGB color accuracy of the professional mode are both very good, which is one of the best color accuracy performance tablets in our database except for the iPad.
For the sake of color accuracy, I would like to rank the video Pad2 screen above OPPO Pad2.
Vivo Pad2 Tianji 9000, LPDDR5 memory+UFS 3.1 flash memory, The performance output is slightly better than that of OPPO Pad 2 with the same configuration.
200 nit brightness, double baking ↑
Room temperature 23.8 ℃, 200 nit screen brightness, 3DMark Wild Life Ulimited test, stability 91.2%; Wild Life Extreme Ulimited test, stability 89.9%. At this time, the maximum temperature is 44.9 degrees, which is 4 fingers below the camera.
The thermal stability of vivo Pad2 is good However, the Tianji 9000 is really not a fuel efficient lamp. Although it is far better than the Huolong 8 Gen 1, the cache is too large after all. Once running, the SoC area is hot, whether it is the vivo Pad 2 or the OPPO Pad 2.
In the same environment, the maximum temperature of the 20 minute "Peace Elite" (HDR HD+limited frames+anti aliasing) is 37.7 degrees.
The 10000mAh battery of vivo Pad2, 200 nit screen brightness, after 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" (HDR high-definition+limit frames+anti aliasing), 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of microblog short video, 1 hour of Wi Fi surfing, and a total of 2.5 hours of endurance test, the remaining power is 75%, which is Normal flagship tablet endurance The big battery was eaten by the big screen.
The actual charging peak value of vivo Pad2 is about 34W ↑
The main charging range is 26W, and after 65%, the power gradually drops back.
Use 44W to fully charge the 10000mAh battery of vivo Pad2, which takes 2 hours and 15 minutes (direct disconnection, no UI charging).
50% in 45 minutes, 65% in 1 hour, 86% in 1.5 hours. The painting style is normal here, but the last trickle is "too trickle". It took only 2 hours to reach 94%. The last 6% took 15 minutes
For 10000mAh The 44W fast charging is obviously not enough. The charging experience is similar to that of Apple, This is a huge insult to any manufacturer (although this is a tablet).
Accessories: The keyboard is OK, the stylus is good
Full name of keyboard cover "vivo" Pad intelligent touch keyboard 2 ", 64 keys, glass touch panel, with Win/Mac dual system shortcut keys, priced at 599 yuan.
The edge gap of the touch panel is very large, and the overall workmanship is weaker than that of the green factory. The keyboard cover is fixed with a magnetic suction. The magnetic suction is firm, and there is a bracket that can be adjusted 150 degrees (this is a good comment). It is similar to Microsoft Surface. The bracket has requirements for land occupation. The keyboard shaft is not fixed, and it is not convenient to put it on the thigh.
The keyboard cover setting is very strange: it is powered by the back contact of the panel, but actually it is controlled by Bluetooth in a circle, and there is no internal battery (comparable to a solar flashlight).
However, its shortcut keys are much more than those of friends. It is easy to switch between split screen/small window/full screen using the win/Option+direction keys. The touch experience of the touch control panel is slightly inferior to that of friends. Because of the Bluetooth connection, the response is slower than that of friends connected by contacts, and the touch control panel is not so easy to follow. Other multi finger gestures are quite similar to OPPO/Apple.
This keyboard cover The main disadvantage is weight The measured weight of the keyboard cover body is 521g (fortunately, it would be heavier if the battery was not added), and the official double-sided clip also weighs 365g. The amount used by the blue factory has always been generous, but it is really too heavy...... As a comparison, the measured weight of the OPPO Pad keyboard cover is 358g (although there is no support, it is also smaller).
If There is a need for high-intensity code words. This keyboard can be used. The overall function experience is actually better than that of Green Factory and Xiaomi (mainly shortcut keys), but it is overweight 。
And vivo Pencil 2. It is one of the few handwriting pens with built-in linear motor. It can be charged wirelessly by magnetic suction and can be used as PPT pointer. The price is 499 yuan. This pen is obviously stronger than the products of friends, and its price is more conscientious. If there is a demand for painting or handwriting, it is worth buying.
There are two different tactile pen heads (large friction and greater friction, the latter has a little eraser), the pen response/touch are tulle OPPO, coupled with the effect of vibration motor and voice dubbing, which is the first time to experience this lifelike handwriting experience on a non Samsung S Pen device, so that even if I don't usually discuss handwriting pens, I can't help but present new works:
In addition, the adaptation of vivo system is also significantly better than OPPO. The automatic pointer adsorption of the touchpad is better than OPPO, but the animation frame rate is not stable enough. Any input box has handwriting recognition, common handwriting recognition such as "marking exchange/marking deletion", and screenshot marking in the upper right corner.
IPad Air 5, OPPO Pad 2, vivo Pad2 ↑ (maximum brightness in default mode, pay attention to screen scale, border thickness, brightness)
Vivo Pad2 (12.1 "7:5) and Xiaomi Flat 6 Pro (11" is about 7.66:5, with thicker frame and plastic support)
Vivo Pad 2 (12.1 inches) and OPPO Pad 2 (11.61 inches) "coincidentally" use the 7:5 screen scale that has not been seen before, Blue and green are really brothers.
After using this ratio, in a word: 7: The screen proportion of 5 is the biggest selling point of vivo Pad 2 and OPPO Pad 2.
Now let's reread the previous content:
As we all know, the closer to a square (1:1), the larger the area of a quadrilateral. 7: 5 The area of the screen is 10% larger than that of the same size screen at 16:10 (for historical reasons, the screen size is marked by the diagonal length).
Let's press the ratio of several common screens to vivo Pad2 And OPPO Pad 2, the long side of the 7:5 screen is converted:
Common mobile phones, 19:9 to 21:9, that is, 7:3.3
Normal iPad, 4:3, i.e. 7:5.3
iPad mini 6， 3: 2, i.e. 7: 4.7
Most Android tablets, 16:10, or 7:4.4
A4 paper, 1.414:1, i.e. 7: 4.95
7: The origin of 5 is obviously to be close to the proportion of A4 paper, which leads to the fact that these two plates of Blue Green Factory are really suitable for reading scanned PDF e-books. They really fit together and look like books.
The screen is split up and down, and there is an available area near the square below ↑
7: 5. The screen is a picture with extra width in the same length of the fuselage.
In addition to vertical grip, it can display several more columns of text or other content, and horizontal split screen can also display several more lines of content, while vertical split screen can make the upper and lower APPs have a wider display area (watching videos/online courses above, and taking notes below). Of course, there will be different views when playing.
There must be some costs: Look at the common 16:9 to 18:9 videos. The video display area of the vivo Pad2 is similar to that of the Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro with an 11 inch screen.
If you just want to find a tablet to be a Bilibili/iQIYI player, it will be more cost-effective to turn left to buy a 16:9 or 16:10 entry-level tablet.
System and experience
Streamline saving: Vivo is better than OPPO in flat panel system.
Not to mention the simple OPPO system desktop (no third-party desktop can be replaced yet!), but the icon density (Vivo's new OTA has reduced the desktop icon density by @ # ￥! @ #%) The number of apps in the Dock column, even the 3x4 large folder, can tell who is more like the tablet.
The Dock bar of vivo Pad2 can hold 11 APPs and display 3 recent APPs. You can draw the Dock bar at a slow speed at the bottom of any interface, and drag the icon on the Dock bar to split the screen/small window. Although the fruit is fruity and the vision is not uniform, it is easy to use! (It would be better if we could set up a permanent task bar like X Fold2).
The functions of the OriginOS 3 HD version are very similar to those of the mobile version, that is, the control center has canceled the traditional style, jovi input method is not the Pro version (there are five strokes, but no double spelling), there is no call/GPS/NFC and other settings, but the APP has all practical functions such as custom refresh rate. In addition, the split screen and small window functions of Blue Factory are really better than those of Green Factory on the flat panel.
But after all, it is Blue Factory's "orange system", and the zoom display is still not perfect. It is necessary to adjust the DP value in developer mode to 900, so that WeChat, a small and beautiful spicy chicken software, can be displayed at normal size.
Except that the phone/SMS function of the mobile phone can't be used directly like the Green Factory, the other functions like screen projection/phone/SMS notification/pasteboard synchronization are similar (Blue Factory can view photo albums across devices). This generation of "remote control PC" function is just like the sunflower remote function given to you by vivo.
With the help of our own atomic notebooks (the word selection of keyboard and touch pad is much better than that of third-party apps such as OneNote) and other apps, as well as the keyboard/stylus adaptation, the overall document experience/productivity of vivo Pad2 is indeed better than OPPO Pad2.
One more thing about performance, The training of the United Development Department is really the stronger point of the Blue Factory.
The daily scheduling of the Vivo Pad2 Tianji 9000 is more active, and it can be fully opened with 8 cores for mild use, so the smoothness is better. However, due to the problem of heat accumulation, the high pressure will be limited to 2.6GHz of the large core after a few minutes of heating, and then it is difficult to avoid the frame. The situation is close to OPPO.
(The lemur browser, which can be directly installed with plug-ins, can be installed with the Violent Monkey plug-in, and last 10 scripts. The 1080P bullet screen of the web version B station 2 times the speed will be fully opened, and the Tianji 9000 will have to be fully opened. The room temperature is 26 degrees, which can barely last for 1 minute, and then the core will fall to 2.6GHz. This story tells us that, If you want to use Android devices as computers, you have to wait several years. The optimization of Android browser is really not good. You still have to use APP to watch videos ）。
But compared with the performance, the memory pressure of Android tablet is also serious. With 8GB of memory, the background resident capacity of vivo Pad2 is equal to that of OPPO Pad2 with 12GB of memory, but it can't be said that once the browser and WeChat are opened, only 4 or 6 applications can reside in the background for a long time (Chrome+Zhang Xiaoshe, really ￥% @ ￥...). Users who need to open more applications for productivity or heavy use are recommended to use 12GB of memory.
Plate analysis in April
The official benchmark with vivo Pad2/OPPO Pad 2 is Samsung Galaxy Tab S8/S8+/S8 Ultra, but the latter is using the hot Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, and the price is moving.
The Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 inch of the Kirin 9000 is nearly two years old. Its performance is 1.5 gears lower, but its price is still "firm". iPad Air？ Please, the M1 on the 60Hz screen is heartbreaking.
Brief comparison:
vivo Pad2， Tianji 9000, 12.1 inch 144Hz 2.8K LCD screen, 585g weight, 266.03 × 191.6 × 6.59mm, 10000mAh battery+44W fast charge. 8+128 version first release 2399 yuan, 8+256 version 2799 yuan, 12+256 version 3099 yuan, 12+512 version 3399 yuan (Strong system based tablet adaptation, cheap and large)
OPPO Pad 2， Tianji 9000, 11.61 inch 144Hz 2.8K LCD screen, 552g weight, 258.03x189.41x6.54mm, 9510mAh battery+67W fast charge. 8+256 version 2999 yuan, 12+256 version 3399 yuan, 12+512 version 3999 yuan (Strong in hand feel, light, but weak in system, 200 or 300 yuan more expensive than vivo)
Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro, Snapdragon 8+, 11 inch 144Hz 2.8K LCD screen, 490g weight, 253.95x165.18x6.51mm, 8600mAh battery+67W fast charge. For the first 8+128 version, 2399 yuan, 8+256 version 2699 yuan, 12+256 version 2999 yuan, 12+512 version 3299 yuan (Strong performance, fast charging, but as long as you don't mind the weight, vivo Pad2 is actually more recommended)
Millet flat plate 6 It is replaced by a Snapdragon 870, 800W in front, 1300W in rear, 8840mAh battery+33W fast charge (full charge in 99 minutes). 1899 yuan for the first 6+128 version, 1999 yuan for the 8+128 version, 2299 yuan for the 8+256 version (Cheap and large, suitable for video watching and light use)
Glory Tablet V8 Pro , Tianji 8100, 12.1 inch 144Hz 2560x1600 LCD, 10050mAh battery+35W fast charge. 8+128 version 2599 yuan, 8+256 version 2899 yuan, 12+256 version 3299 yuan
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ , Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, 12.4-inch 2800x1752 OLED screen, 567g weight, 285x185x5.7mm, 10090mAh battery+45W fast charge. 8+128 version starts from 6399 yuan. The advantage is that TF card expansion is supported, and 5G version is available (for 1000 yuan)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 , Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, 11 inch 2560x1600 LCD screen, 503g weight, 253.8x165.3x6.3mm, 8000mAh battery, the current official website 8+128 version is 4269 yuan, and 8+256 version is 4569 yuan.
iPad Air 5 , the invincible Apple M1, 10.9-inch 60Hz screen. 461g, 247.6 × 178.5 × 6.1mm, 461g, 7730mAh battery, horizontal screen double lift. 8+64 version is worth 4455 yuan, and 8+256 version is worth 5599 yuan (without Apple, it's really hard for everyone to remember hard and think sweet in the technology circle)
IPad Pro with 120Hz screen, The weight and size of 6399 (8+128), 11 inch 2388x1668 LCD are close to those of Air5. But with this pricing, your 2018 iPad Pro will suddenly lose its card
12.9 inch iPad Pro 280.6 × 214.9 × 6.4mm, 682g, the old M1 also costs 8499 yuan (8+128)
Lenovo Saver 900 14.5 Tianji 9000, but the 14.5-inch 3K screen and 740g weight are completely different in positioning (second only to the 14.6-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra), and the 12+256 version is over confident at 4999 yuan.
summary
Vivo Pad2 is a large screen with good color accuracy. The ratio of 7:5 is more comfortable for daily use, the external display performance is good, and the endurance is normal. The system's utilization of the large screen, Tianji 9000 tuning, memory management/background residence are better than those of Greenworks, and even the adaptation of hand writing pen/keyboard accessories is obviously more sincere.
Its biggest problem is the weak 44W fast charge and weight. The measured bare metal machine is 590g, and the keyboard cover is 521g (OPPO Pad 2 bare metal machine is 550g, and the keyboard cover is 358g). One set of them can catch up with the notebook.
The previous evaluation said that "OPPO Pad 2 is my favorite tablet this year, and I hope Xiaomi Tablet 6 Pro can give me a chance to hit my face". It turned out that it was Vivo, not Xiaomi, who hit me in the face.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
