Taking photos is not the core selling point of iQOO 10 Pro, but it is the addition of vivo V1+self-developed ISP chips. The main aperture is narrowed from F1.75 to F1.88, and the telephoto is increased from 2.5 times to 3 times. However, it is a model suitable for comparing the impact of self-developed ISP chips. This time, we found iQOO 9 Pro for comparison, and Xiaomi 11 Ultra made a guest appearance in some scenes.
In fact, there are too many sample photos, and the iQOO 10 Pro detailed review cannot be filled, so it is written independently
IQOO 10 Pro camera configuration:
Front 1600W, 1/3.1 ", 1 μ m, F2.45
Main camera micro pan tilt GN55000W, 1/1.57 '', 1 μ m, 7P lens, 23mm, F1.88
150 degree ultra wide angle, 5000W, JN1, 1/2.76 ", 0.64 μ m, equivalent 15mm, 6P lens, F2.27
Triple telephoto S5K3P91600W (output 1460W), 1 μ m, 1/3.1 "", equivalent 69mm, F2.2+OIS
The longest focal length with the biggest change is only the increase of focal length from 8.1mm to 8.9mm, and the superposition of digital cutting from 1600W to 1460W.
Ultra wide angle contrast
Super wide angle, scene 1 and 2, panoramic and central contrast
Enlarge and contrast the upper left corner of the screen
Super wide angle, scene 3 and 4, panoramic and central contrast
Super wide angle, scenes 5 and 6, panoramic and central contrast
Super wide angle, scene 7, panoramic and central contrast
Super wide angle, scene 8, panoramic and central contrast
Super wide angle, scene 9, panoramic and central contrast
Super wide angle, scene 10, panoramic and central contrast
Comparison between "3x zoom" and "5x zoom"
Although the focus of exif information display is slightly different, the field of vision is actually similar.
"3x zoom", scene 1 and 2, panoramic and central contrast
"3x zoom", scene 3 and 4, panoramic and central contrast
"3x zoom", scenes 5 and 6, panoramic and central contrast
"5x zoom", scene 1 and 2, panoramic and central contrast
"5x zoom", scene 3 and 4, panoramic and central contrast
Subjective contrast
Main shot, scene 1 and 2, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, big backlight, scene 3 and 4, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 5 and 6, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 7 and 8, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 9, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 10, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 11, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 12, panoramic and central contrast
Main shot, scene 13, panoramic and central contrast
Summary
In the ultra wide angle where the hardware is completely consistent, it is difficult to see that the iQOO 10 Pro and iQOO 9 Pro are substantially different (iQOO 10 Pro noise reduction is more powerful). Although the ultra wide angle of Xiaomi 11 Ultra is free for IMX586, the weak light advantage of the outsole is not a joke, and the gap is large.
The weak focal length advantage on the telephoto has indeed improved some details, which is the biggest difference between the two generations of iQOO photography. However, the takeoff magnification has increased from 2.5 times to 3 times, sacrificing the point field of view. Now, the triple focus also relies heavily on multi frame synthesis. When the hand shakes or the scenery swings with the wind, there will be obvious differences. Personally, I feel like walking three steps back two steps.
On the main camera, the good news of iQOO 10 Pro is that there is vivo V1+, and the bad news aperture is smaller. The actual HDR of the machine is more active, and it has more advantages in the big light and backlight scenes in the daytime. The extreme sharpness is slightly better in the daytime, but the anti glare ability is reduced (ha? Mingming aperture narrowing should be conducive to improving the quality of the lens?). The night scene discrimination is maintained well, and is not greatly affected by the aperture, even the dark part is brighter.
Although there is a blue factory algorithm, the hardware specifications are indeed here. The iQOO 10 Pro's photo performance in the same price model can only be regarded as the middle level. It is really difficult for it to compete with the Xiaomi 11 Ultra GN2.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
