To investigate the improvement of vivo X80 Pro, we brought Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Xiaomi 11 Ultra, and vivo X70 Pro+for photo comparison. The draft has been delayed for a long time.
The SoC of the vivo X80 Pro is replaced by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Tianji 9000, the GNV main camera with the minor upgrade of the filter is upgraded to the vivo V1+, the micro pan tilt is moved from the ultra wide angle to the 2x telephoto, and the telephoto is replaced by the same specification CMOS of Hynix. The rest is little different from the previous generation of vivo X70 Pro+.
Because it is the main court of vivo, the focus segments selected are the main camera, ultra wide angle, 2x and 5x, which are staggered with Samsung's 3x+10x telephoto, putting the S22 Ultra at a disadvantage. But it is the big brother after all, let's give up first.
PS： All are in full automatic mode. The focus is in the center of the picture. By default, the samples are shown in full view first and then in the center.
Vivo X50 Pro+, vivo X60 Pro+, vivo X70 Pro+, vivo X80 Pro ↑
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle, scene 1, field of view contrast. Pay attention to the left and right edges
Ultra wide angle, scene 1, central magnification
Super wide angle, scene 1, left edge enlarged. Pay attention to the purple edge of the edge
Ultra wide angle, scene 2, visual field comparison
Ultra wide angle, scene 2, central magnification (dark part)
Ultra wide angle, scene 2, zoom in on the right side of the center
Super wide angle, scene 3
Super wide angle, scene 3, zoom in at the center and upper part of the center. Pay attention to highlights
Super wide angle, scene 4. Panorama and central magnification
Ultra wide angle, low light scene. Panorama and central magnification
Ultra wide angle, extremely weak light scene. Panorama and central magnification
"2x zoom" contrast
When "2x zoom" is used, the vivo X80 and X70 Pro+are both physical 2x telephotos (1.22 μ m+OIS), and the Xiaomi 11 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra are both digitally cropped. However, Xiaomi has GN2, and the sub-pixel itself has 1.4 μ m, which is even close to the double focal length of Vivo in terms of specifications.
"2x zoom", Scene 1. Panorama and central magnification
"2x zoom", Scene 2. Panorama and central magnification
"2x zoom", light scene. Panorama and central magnification. The highlight suppression feature of the two vivos is simply a family landmark.
"2x zoom", extremely weak light scene. Panorama and central magnification. Two vivo can still trigger twice the telephoto.
"5x zoom" contrast
Samsung has a 3x+10x telephoto setting, and the other three have 5x telephoto lenses. The five times telephoto of vivo X80 Pro and X70 Pro+is the same in specifications, but the high and low sense performances are different.
"5x zoom", panoramic and central magnification
Comparison after calling the 10x telephoto of Samsung S22 Ultra. No kidding, physics is 10 times more discriminative.
"5x zoom", Scene 2, panoramic and central zoom
Comparison after calling the 10x telephoto of Samsung S22 Ultra ↑
"5x zoom", light scene, panorama and central magnification
"5x zoom", weak light scene, panoramic and central magnification
Subjective contrast
Main camera contrast, scene 1, panoramic and central magnification
(Samsung metering and HDR are really better, and dark details are rich and pleasing. Vigorous sharpening and unfinished noise processing make the first impression of detail rich.)
Main picture contrast, scene 1, left edge picture quality contrast
As we all know, in order to control the main shooting thickness, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has obvious image quality degradation in the edge area, which is more exaggerated than its own ultra wide angle lens.
Main camera contrast, scene 2, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 3, backlight, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, light scene 1, panoramic and central magnification (after the light weakens, it enters Xiaomi's home court)
Main contrast, light scene 1, bottom edge contrast.
Focus contrast, light scene 1, right edge image quality contrast.
Main camera contrast, light scene 2, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, light scene 3, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 1, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 2, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 3, panoramic and central magnification (the light continues to weaken, leaving the vivo X80 Pro and Xiaomi 11 Ultra fighting)
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 4, panoramic and central magnification
Weak light scene 4, zoom in on the right side of the center
Weak light scene 4, details contrast in the upper right corner
summary
Ultra wide angle: The S22 Ultra's ultra wide-angle hardware is the weakest of the four, but Xiaomi and Vivo's IMX586/589, micro PTZ, In front of Samsung, they are all brothers Samsung ultra wide angle has no high light suppression. Samsung is stronger in discrimination, edge purple edge control, weak light performance, HDR and other aspects.
The X80 Pro proved that, The micro platform on the super wide angle has no effect on taking pictures (Anyway, the shutter speed is the same as that of X70 Pro+. What difference can there be?). Unexpectedly, the closest performance between X80 Pro and X70 Pro+is the ultra wide angle with the largest hardware change. Xiaomi doesn't need to mention it. It has the largest vision, but it is also a classic Baigei IMX586.
2x telephoto: The X80 Pro uses a micro pan tilt for its 2x telephoto. The disadvantage is that the aperture is smaller. The facts tell us that, The improvement from OIS to micro PTZ is far less than the disadvantage brought by aperture narrowing The X80 Pro's 2x telephoto is completely behind the previous generation, and the weaker the light is, the greater the gap is, becoming the biggest short board among the four cameras. When the shutter speed is slower than that of the previous generation and Xiaomi's main camera (WeCloud really tried its best), it is still abandoned, and is barely "five to five" with Xiaomi 11 Ultra's GN2 main camera digital cutting, which is only slightly better than Samsung's HM3 (white balance also occasionally releases itself) digital cutting.
5x telephoto: Xiaomi 11 Ultra's 5x IMX586 is still the king of 5x focal length , which is much better than the 800W 5x telephoto of two vivos, and Samsung uses 3x telephoto for digital zoom, which is even more incomparable. Of course, as we all know, the S22 Ultra is a telescope phone with 10 times optical telephoto, and the super telephoto is its home court.
Main camera: In qualifying, I will put the X80 Pro at the top. The details of X80 Pro are slightly improved compared with the previous generation , but we can't confirm whether it is the GNV filter or the vivo V1+/new algorithm. The characteristics are still the extremely exaggerated highlight suppression (more exaggerated than the previous generation, and a little overexerted), the analytical difficulty caused by the combination of multi frame sharpening+smudging, and the white balance and AI color matching that have no intention of faithful restoration and are extremely pleasing to the eye.
The subsequent Xiaomi 11 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra are hard to distinguish:
Xiaomi 11 Ultra Highlight suppression is slightly stronger, GN2's detail/dark light performance is better, and there are still many courses to be completed in other areas such as white balance, light metering, contrast control, etc. (but in fact, its algorithm has not been improved in the past year).
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Here, the metaphysical point is that the tone and AI semantic recognition is better, where the light should be bright, where the dark should be dark (although the highlight suppression is the same as that of the iPhone, equal to no), there are dark details beyond the naked eye, but it will not lead to the decline of the contrast of the picture like Xiaomi. In many scenes, even the first impression is more pleasing than Vivo's circle of friends.
But its sharpening is extremely hard. In front of Samsung, vivo is light sharpening. The noise removal is not so clean, and the Maoist Party looks happy at first glance, but in fact, the picture details are not much worse, and there is a very obvious edge degradation. Although the lag is not very large, HM3 is old and honest, and it was surpassed by several domestic flagship in the weak light scene.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
