This comparison is mainly to see how much gain the Mariana X and dual OIS can bring to the IMX766 of OPPO Find X5 Pro, and whether they can compete with the flagship. Competitors include Yijia 10 Pro, the friend circle warrior vivo X70 Pro+, and the GN2 bodyguard Xiaomi 11 Ultra.
PS： There are many proofs, in full automatic mode, and the focus is in the center. Arrange according to the long focus, super wide angle, and then the main camera. The conclusion should be put at the end.
Specification comparison
Xiaomi 11 Ultra vivo X70 Pro+、 One plus 10 Pro, OPPO Find X5 Pro specifications ↑
On the left is @ Victory Wen Crepe Find X5 Pro main camera disassembly (the background mobile phone is P50 Pocket)
On the right is @ Lou Bin's disassembly of Xiaomi 11 Ultra (OPPO's dual OIS, the area is really GN2)
Main camera specification: Xiaomi 11 Ultra>vivo X70 Pro+>One Plus 10 Pro>Find X5 Pro, which translates to 1.4 μ m>1.2 μ m>1.12 μ m>1 μ m. But OPPO added "double OIS", and the area of the main camera module is huge ↑
Ultra wide angle: The IMX766 (1 μ m) of the Find X5 Pro is one position ahead of the IMX598/586 (0.8 μ m), followed by two brothers. The IMX598 of the X70 Pro+also has a micro platform. This year, the JN1, which is widely distributed with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, is only 0.64 μ m, and the specification is obviously weak.
Long focus: Xiaomi 11 Ultra's 5x focus IMX586 is still a world-class player, and the vivo X70 Pro+is the strongest 2x focus+ordinary 800W 5x focus. From a practical point of view, there is little difference between 800W 3.3x for one plus 10 Pro and 1300W 2x for Find X5 Pro.
2x and 5x Long Focus Comparison: Have fun
The specifications of the long coke section vary greatly, and the ritual comparison is simple. Only OPPO Find X5 Pro and vivo X70 Pro+have a 2x zoom. When "2x zoom" is used, the other two are digital zoom. Xiaomi 11 Ultra will trigger telephoto for "fusion" when it is more than 3 times, while one plus 10 Pro is 3.3 times telephoto.
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 1, panoramic and central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 2, panoramic and central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 3, panoramic and central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 4, panoramic and central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 1, panoramic and central magnification (no comparison in discrimination)
Comparison of "5x zoom", Scene 2, panoramic and central magnification (no comparability of discrimination)
Comparison of "5x zoom", Scene 3, panoramic and central magnification (no comparability of discrimination)
"5x zoom" contrast, Scene 4, panoramic and right central magnification (discrimination is almost comparable)
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 5, panoramic and central magnification (here Xiaomi 11 Ultra does not trigger the night view mode, defeated by the night view vivo 5x zoom, sad)
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, panoramic and central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 2, panoramic and central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 4, panoramic and central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 5
Super wide angle contrast, scene 6, panoramic view and right side of the center enlarged
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 7 zoomed in at the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 8, panoramic and central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 8, zoom in at the top of the center (see highlight suppression)
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 9 (see highlight suppression)
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 10, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 11, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 12, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 13, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 14, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 15, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 16, zoom in at the top of the center
Subjective contrast
Main camera contrast, scene 1, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 2, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 3
Main camera contrast, scene 4
Main camera contrast, scene 5, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 6, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 7, panorama and right side of the center enlarged
Main camera contrast, scene 8, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 8, zoom in at the top of the center
Main camera contrast, scene 9, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 10, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 11, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 12, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 13, panorama and right side of the center enlarged
Main camera contrast, scene 14, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 15, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 16, panorama, center and right side of center enlarged
Main camera contrast, scene 17, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 18, panoramic and central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 18, dark part at the top of the center enlarged
summary
OPPO Find X5 Pro is summarized as "close to the best photographic experience+the strongest ultra wide angle+good main photography+tactical telephoto".
Its multi frame synthesis is extremely active, with a high film completion rate. Its photo taking experience is very good, and it has the fastest night scene imaging speed of the flagship today. For other flagship 2 - and 3-second night scenes, the Find X5 Pro even finished in 1 second. However, like the iPhone, priority is given to ensuring the shutter response. When shooting at a high speed, there will be "sandwiched" (mixed with samples without multi frame synthesis). Its proportion is inversely proportional to the light intensity. The more slow shutter is needed for the scene, the higher the "sandwiched" proportion of crazy continuous shooting.
The white balance tends to be red and warm, which is not very accurate. Of course, it must be much closer to the naked eye than the X70 Pro+, which is extremely flattering. Love pressure metering and dark parts, and the contrast is also higher than other models. The first impression is pleasant, but the details of dark parts will be sacrificed.
Main camera: The actual focal length is close to that of one plus 10 Pro (5.97mm vs. 6.06mm), which is larger in CMOS. The equivalent focal length is longer than that of other flagship ships, and the field of vision is smaller, which benefits the discrimination. Except for the extremely weak light scene, the X70 Pro+will lose a lot of money, and the other scenes are almost the ones with the best discrimination. Even if it is just IMX766, the algorithm and Mariana X blessing, extremely weak light can kill one plus 10 Pro. The weakness is the details of the dark part when the light is weak, which is still different from the X70 Pro+and Xiaomi 11 Ultra with the super bottom (faster shutter and the algorithm of pressing the dark part have to be backed up);
Ultra wide angle: The defending champion, who seeks defeat alone, has opened a gap second only to Long Jiao, which is strong enough to make you often confuse the main and auxiliary photos. The field of vision is slightly smaller than X70 Pro+and a large circle smaller than Xiaomi, but the details, edge quality and dark details are stronger. If the highlight suppression of super wide angle is stronger, it may be difficult to surpass it in the last year or two.
Long focus: The pain lasted for 2 years, without OIS 1300W double focus, dreaming back to 2017. Discriminant Xiaoli is better than Xiaomi 11 Ultra's 2x digital zoom, which is far better than one plus 10 Pro's digital cutting. When it reaches 5x, the faster shutter setting will be superimposed. Even Mariana X can't be saved, let alone the other two true 5x telephoto machines.
Finally, some other old friends:
vivo X70 Pro+ It is a friend of the oil painting school who has a pleasing look and feel. The nightscape and highlight suppression are really strong. The price is the power of discrimination, especially the power of super wide-angle discrimination.
Xiaomi 11 Ultra, The GN2 night vision is hard to beat. Even if the GN2 has a 2x digital zoom, it is still equivalent to 1.4 μ m, and it also has OIS, which is stronger than the 99% 2x telephoto. The rare naturalists, as long as they do not trigger the night owl algorithm, are naturally comfortable with details, and their weaknesses are super wide-angle and capture ability.
One plus 10 Pro: The most natural picture details in the four sets are rarely sharpened, and the smearing is also the lightest. However, the IMX689 cannot win the IMX766. Firmware that does not like multi frame synthesis needs to be backed up, and the ultra wide angle is too weak.
This story tells us:
Although the "dual OIS" makes the area of the main camera module of the Find X5 Pro comparable to GN2, in order to improve the capture ability of OPPO, the shutter speed of most scenes of the Find X5 Pro is faster than other flagship (including extremely weak light scenes). The 1/2 second safety shutter of dual OIS is useless. In the photo part, Mariana X and IMX766 are fighting;
Mariana X really has an effect, it can bypass the level to kill a larger CMOS plus 10 Pro. The difference brought by multi frame synthesis and algorithm is greater than expected (the core role of Mariana X is to enable Find X5 Pro to run more complex algorithm models at reasonable power consumption);
Vivo's micro cloud station ultra wide angle also doesn't use up the safety shutter. The shutter is even more conservative than Xiaomi 11 Ultra's ultra wide angle. Now the ultra wide angle OIS and micro PTZ mainly improve the film rate and video anti shake, and have no significant impact on the photographic effect;
If OPPO and Xiaomi are now pursuing capture settings, ordinary OIS will be more than enough, and dual OIS and micro PTZ will be somewhat wasteful. The extra cost might as well be a super large bottom, or an OIS for the telephoto, or a high magnification lens.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
