Simple photo comparison: one plus 10 Pro versus one plus 9 Pro, real GT2 Pro
Simple photo comparison: one plus 10 Pro versus one plus 9 Pro, real GT2 Pro

This is the photo part of the one plus 10 Pro evaluation, which has been dragging drafts for many years. Compare the contestants' one plus 9 Pro and the real GT2 Pro, and intersperse the demo of vivo X70 Pro+. Two generations of one plus is mainly super wide angle, and one plus 9 Pro is sometimes still the highest specification super wide angle, while the real GT2 Pro is the annual hot JN1 for IMX766.

You still need to see more proof sheets when taking photos As a simple comparison, I will not repeat it too much. The conclusion is put at the end, for reference only, hoping to help the users in need.

Example parameter comparison:


"3.3x zoom" comparison

Both of the two sets are the ancestral 8 million pixel 1 μ m 3.3 times telephoto. Because of their low pixels and small size, their actual performance is slightly better than that of the digital cutting (real GT2 Pro main IMX766), which is a half tactical lens.


Scene 1 of "3.3x zoom", comparison of global and central magnification


Scene 2 of "3.3x zoom", comparison of global and central magnification


"3.3x zoom" scene 3, central zoom contrast


Ultra wide angle contrast

Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 1, global and central comparison


Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 2, central magnification


Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 3, central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 4, global and central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 5, global and central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 6, global and central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 7, global and central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 8, global and central magnification


Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 9, global and central magnification


Subjective contrast

Main camera contrast, scene 1, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 2, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 3, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 4, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 5, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 5, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 6, global and central magnification


Main camera contrast, scene 7, global and central magnification



Main camera contrast, scene 8


Main camera contrast, scene 9, global and central magnification

Summary

Since the era of multi camera, there is no flagship of full focus segment dominance, so you can only select models based on common focus segments:

vivo X70 Pro+: As a guest star in the "circle of friends", the excellent multi frame composition algorithm has better tolerance of light and shade, and eye-catching white balance, contrast and sharpening algorithms. However, both the main and secondary camera fields are wide. In addition to strong smearing+sharpening, the discrimination has been weak since the X50 Pro+. Although the specification of micro PTZ IMX598 ultra wide angle is fierce, except for the extremely weak light scene, it cannot win this generation of JN1 (especially the discrimination).

One plus 9 Pro: The IMX766 freeform lens has a super wide angle, and its specifications are more vigorous. Its advantages are also night view, edge image quality and distortion control, but its analytical power is also poor, The super wide angle pit has really failed too many classic CMOS. The main shooting performance is actually slightly better than the one plus 10 Pro at this stage, but this is the result of the one plus 9 Pro relying heavily on multi frame synthesis, which is obtained by taking pictures (resulting in weak shutter and imaging speed).

Real GT2 Pro: This unfocused JN1 (the JN1 of One Plus 10 Pro has no macro and no focus), even the aperture is smaller than that of One Plus (F2.4 vs. F2.2), but the central discrimination is really good, and the dynamic range of weak light is not much worse than that of 766, which is unexpectedly strong, but the edge correction algorithm is too weak, and the edge image quality is hard. The biggest happiness is that the main photographer can play with Yijia's IMX789 every time. The main weakness of self camera is that it has almost no ability to suppress highlights, and the multi frame synthesis algorithm is also weak.

One plus 10 Pro: The most obvious improvement in the photographic experience is that the film completion rate and imaging are much higher than that of One Plus 9 Pro, which also corrects the problem of the previous generation's preference for press exposure during highlight suppression. Compared with the previous generation, the current style of One Plus 10 Pro is more like the true self. The sharpening of the main and secondary cameras is more powerful, the contrast is slightly higher, and the noise is still a familiar feeling. Oh, by the way, it's really easy to show your fingers when you put 150 degree super wide angle on the edge of your phone


Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer

Follow our WeChat official account: playphone

Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer

Share:
Brown
edit
Jilao Toolman

Scan QR code and follow the author

Share Weibo Share WeChat
 Aigoji WeChat

Aigoji WeChat

 WeChat

WeChat

Recommended products

Sorry, the product you are looking for is not available in the product library

on trial