In the X60 Pro+evaluation, we started with the title "Adults can't have all of them". After six months, adults finally said that - I want all of them.
vivo X70 Pro+is a domestic flagship with the most complete configurations: 2K LTPO E5 double curvature screen, Zeiss Faith+full optical anti shake four camera, 50W wireless charging, infrared, HiFi chip IP68、USB 3.1， A flagship can have all of them.
Specifications: All
Comparison of flagship specifications, I didn't expect that the Vivo Super Cup would also have a "forced cost performance" day
Re read the specifications:
Glass version (black) 8.99mm, plain leather version (blue and orange) 9.27mm, 210g weight
6.78 inch 120Hz 2K LTPO Samsung E5 middle perforated hyperbolic screen, 300Hz touch sampling (daily 120Hz)
Snapdragon 888+, 4500mAh battery+55W wired+50W wireless charging
Front 3200W, S5KGD2，0.8μm，F2.45
Main camera GN15000W, 1.2 μ m, F1.57+OIS, 1G+6P Zeiss lens
Ultra wide angle IMX5984800W, micro platform+macro, 0.8 μ m, F2.2，14mm
5x periscope OV08A10800W, 1 μ m, F3.4
2x 50mm portrait IMX663, 1.22 μ m+2PD focusing, OIS+F1.6 incredible aperture
IP68, USB 3.1, CS43131 HiFi chip, infrared (before only Xiaomi and Huawei still insist on) have everything.
The real hardware short board of vivo X70 Pro+is 5x telephoto, fast charging and compatible. In addition to the endangered headphone port, only the 3D ultrasonic fingerprint of iQOO 8 Pro and Sharp R6, and the UWB without eggs, the vivo X70 Pro+has everything it needs. Yes There may be no flagship with the most complete configurations today 。
Appearance: no longer lightweight, but still "not environmentally friendly"
Vivo, the bridgehead of the "Anti environmental Alliance", has always insisted on delivering earphones to the flagship. On the X70 Pro+exclusive version, vivo goes a step further, delivering wireless headsets. It is also the flagship vivo TWS 2 with 499 yuan, which is really not environmentally friendly, I like it。 The last time I unpacked the phone with earphones, it was the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Thom Browne limited edition, which cost 25499 yuan.
Vivo's ancestral operation of "delivering over standard charging heads" is also constantly stimulating Apple's environmental nerves. The vivo X70 Pro+and charging cable are 55W, but the 66W charging head is delivered. X50 Pro before Generation 2+ (The machine is 44W). Its 55W head is used on vivo X70 Pro+, which is just good and environmentally friendly.
For vivo X70 Pro+, it is recommended to use a lighter, thinner, better care and better heat dissipation glass version (although only a black version). Because the official shell is a plain leather version, and the glass version is the model of "everything".
Left iQOO 8 Pro, right vivo X70 Pro+
Upper vivo X70 Pro+(darker black, more complex surface treatment), lower iQOO 8 Pro
One plus 9 Pro iPhone 12 Pro Max、vivo X70 Pro+、 Xiaomi 11 Ultra, Sony Xperia 1 III
The vivo X70 Pro+and iQOO 8 Pro are the same 6.78 inch 120Hz Samsung LTPO E5 hyperbolic screen, with similar 3D dimensions. The vivo X70 Pro+in the glass version is thinner.
The black version is fluorite AG glass. If you look at the frosted black, you can see the "fluorite" pattern of layers and layers of blinking, which implements the low-key and sullen philosophy. The right side of the full optical anti shake four camera is a ceramic cloud window, which can also be used as a mirror at ordinary times, and can achieve the effect of 80% of the back secondary screen (By the way, give the following 888+heat dissipation?) 。
vivo X70 Pro+ Not only is the configuration top, but also the pocket top. Because the border control is general, the 6.78-inch vivo X70 Pro+is larger than the 6.81-inch Xiaomi 11 Ultra. Basically, except for the iPhone 13 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, the vivo X70 Pro+is The flagship of today's largest platform 。
Workmanship&feel&fingerprint identification&release&vibration
Workmanship: There is no need to worry about the blue factory work. There is still a circle of hidden glue on the edge of the screen, which fits perfectly. At the junction of the ceramic cloud window and the camera matrix, a design similar to the "floating screen" is made, which is easy to accumulate dust;
feel: The radian of the front and back glass and the middle frame is comfortable. The fuselage is too large and a little hand holding. The 210g weight will make you feel the gravity from the earth all the time;
Fingerprint identification: The position is lower, and the experience is not different from the previous generation;
Linear motor: The vibration force is weak and in good order;
Finally, I added a pair of speakers with enough volume and a filter of vicissitudes.
System and performance
OriginOS 1.0 based on Android 11, familiar flavor. Except for the notice bar/control center with large font and elements, which cannot be switched left and right by sliding due to the default DP, the background management is general, and the local backup file cannot be generated (unfortunately, the USB 3.1 interface), its smoothness, appearance, and function are OK, so I will not repeat them here.
CPU test:
GPU test:
Flash test:
Vivo X70 Pro+the 888+dragon The training is conservative, the single core performance is OK, and the multi-core performance is obvious . But after all, it is 888+, which is also very enthusiastic at ordinary times. In daily use, the small and large cores can often be fully fired, and the X1 super core can only reach 2.38GHz and 2.8GHz.
Peace Elite (HDR HD+limited frames+anti aliasing) frame rate statistics ↑
This generation of vivo X70 Pro+has a larger body and a glass version, Stable thermal power consumption is improved The single baking GPU at room temperature of 25 ℃ can keep the power consumption of the whole machine above 7W in the first 15 minutes, and about 5.5W after 23 minutes.
Oh, by the way, the vivo X70 Pro+also has game frames similar to the iQOO 8 Pro. When inserting the game from 45 MEMC frames to 90 frames, use the following degree (after all, the system level is actually 45 frames) to exchange for significantly reduced power consumption. However, iQOO relies on Pixelworks independent display chip, while vivo X70 Pro+uses self-developed vivo V1 chip, which still needs time for game adaptation, and there is still a gap in the number of games currently supported.
Screen: very top specification, conservative high frame optimization
Vivo used 2K screens on the Xplay 3S in early 2014, but the last time the mainline series used 2K screens Last time Xplay6 at the end of 2016. By 2021, vivo will finally use the top screen for iQOO 8 Pro and vivo X70 Pro+: 6.78 inch 120Hz 2K LTPO Samsung E5 material, 300Hz touch sampling (daily 120Hz).
Vivo X70 Pro+ The screen is summarized as the brightness of the top stream, the color accuracy of the upper mainstream, and the conservative high frame optimization.
Standard mode P3 color standard
Standard mode sRGB color standard
Professional mode sRGB color standard
Objective test comparison of domestic flagship screens ↑
Because it is the same screen, the vivo X70 Pro+objective test is also very close to the iQOO 8 Pro:
Vivo X70 Pro+full white manual maximum brightness is 460 nits. At this time, the four corners are 465/462/460/461 nits. Full white automatic excitation brightness reaches 913 nits, and local brightness reaches 1265 nits. It and iQOO 8 Pro are the current brightness record keeping brothers;
The default standard mode color temperature is 7220K, the gamma value is 2.22, and the average gray scale deviation is 3.4. Covering 95.7% of P3 color gamut, the average color deviation is 2.2, and the maximum is 5.5; Covering 129.8% of sRGB gamut, the average color deviation is 4.3, and the maximum is 6.6;
The color temperature of professional mode is 7225K, the gamma is 2.22, and the average gray scale deviation is 3.4,. Covering 99.7% of P3 color gamut, the average color deviation is 2.8, and the maximum is 5.5; Covering 142.3% of sRGB gamut, the average color deviation is 5, and the maximum is 7.4;
The color temperature of gorgeous mode is 6262K, slightly warmer, and the gamma is 2.37 (higher contrast), with an average gray scale deviation of 2.3. Covering 98.6% of sRGB gamut, the average color deviation is 1.8, and the maximum is 3.2.
By the deadline of September 23, the high frame settings of vivo X70 Pro+are mainly determined by the package name. Although the ordinary version is locked for 60 frames, the Play version can be 120 frames. There is also a method to force the global 120Hz on Ku'an (install the factory test apk, and forcibly lock 120Hz through the LCM frame rate setting test), which can be solved according to personal needs.
but LTPO's self-adaptive refresh rate and power saving feature are temporarily unavailable Only 60Hz and 120Hz are automatically adjusted. In developer options Similar to DC dimming switch, it is also a UI switch like iQOO 8 Pro , hope OTA can catch up as soon as possible.
Photo: Very strong from super wide angle to 2x long focal length
Vivo X70 Pro+is the only flagship of "full optical anti shake" for four cameras. There are two thresholds: first, the ultra wide angle with OIS anti shake is only equipped with vivo X70 Pro+and X60 Pro+for the time being. Second, this year only the vivo X70 Pro+has a 2x telephoto with optical anti shake
This generation of camera improves the lens (with glass lens and stronger coating), 2x telephoto and vivo V1 chip (the latter is mainly to improve the imaging speed, reduce power consumption, extremely low light brightness and smoothness), and the specific specifications are as follows:
Main camera S5KGN15000W, 1/1.31 '', 1.2 μ m, F1.57, OIS, 1G+6P Zeiss lens, 23mm;
Micro pan tilt Super wide-angle ， 4800W， IMX598，0.8μm，1/2''，F2.2，14mm，0.6X；
5x periscope long-focus ， 800W， OV08A10，1.0μm，1/4.4''，F3.4， 60x digital zoom;
Today's strongest 2x telephoto ， IMX6631200W, 1.22 μ m, 1/2.93 '', 2PD focusing, OIS。 In 2021, the unique 50mm telephoto in the flagship will use a F1.6 aperture larger than most of the main cameras, and a very obvious portrait lens setting.
This comparison model includes Xiaomi 11 Ultra (representative of main camera and super telephoto), iPhone 12 Pro Max (representative of white balance), IMX766 freeform surface super wide angle 1-plus 9 Pro and previous generation vivo X60 Pro+.
Xiaomi 11 Ultra The main camera is 5000W, 1/1.12 '' GN2, 1.4 μ m, F1.95； 128 degree IMX586 (4800W, 0.8 μ m) ultra wide angle+5 times periscope IMX586.
One plus 9 Pro IMX7894800W, 1.12 µ m, 1/1.35 "(original 16:11), F1.8； 5000W, 1 μ m IMX766 freeform surface ultra wide angle+3.3 times 800W (1 μ m) telephoto
iPhone 12 Pro Max The main camera is a 1200W IMX603, 1.7 μ mF1.6. The sensor displacement OIS is 1 μ m 1200W ultra wide angle and 2.5 times long focus.
Zeiss natural color mode contrast
Vivo X70 Pro+has more ZEISS natural color function, which does not affect multi frame synthesis after being turned on, but ZEISS natural color and AI scene optimization are mutually exclusive (AI scene optimization will not automatically return to the open state after turning off ZEISS color).
The actual difference is not very big. The natural color of ZEISS is more faithful to "restoration", the white balance is closer to reality, more yellow and warmer, the contrast returns to nature, and the noise reduction is slightly lighter. Keep the default for daily use, save some effort, and the picture is more pleasing.
Main camera auto mode and Zeiss natural color contrast
Main camera - automatic mode and Zeiss natural color contrast, central magnification
Main camera and super wide angle - automatic mode and Zeiss natural color contrast
Main camera and super wide angle - automatic mode and Zeiss natural color contrast, central magnification
Main camera and super wide angle - automatic mode and Zeiss natural color contrast
Main camera and super wide angle - automatic mode and Zeiss natural color contrast, central magnification
Comparison with X60 Pro+
Strong light source glare contrast
Main camera contrast 1
Focus contrast 2 (only the glare of the iPhone can completely reflect the whole store signboard, which is something that the 1000 yuan machine can't do)
Main camera contrast 2, central amplification
Ultra wide angle 1
Ultra Wide Angle 2
Ultra wide angle 2, central amplification
Subjective contrast
Main camera contrast, scene 1
Main camera contrast, scene 2
Main camera contrast, scene 3
Main camera contrast, scene 4
Main camera contrast, scene 4, central magnification
Main camera contrast, Scene 5
Main camera contrast, scene 6, central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 6, zoom in at the bottom right of the center
Main contrast, light scene 1
Main camera contrast, light scene 1, central magnification
Main contrast, light scene 2
Main camera contrast, light scene 2, central magnification (pay attention to the virtualization of yellow flowers in the foreground, and the degree of virtualization is proportional to the aperture and sensor size)
Main contrast, light scene 3
Main camera contrast, light scene 4
Main camera contrast, light scene 4, central magnification
Main contrast, light scene 5
Main camera contrast, light scene 5, central magnification
Main contrast, light scene 6
Main camera contrast, light scene 6, central magnification
Main contrast, light scene 7
Main camera contrast, light scene 7, central magnification
Main contrast, light scene 8
Main camera contrast, light scene 8, central magnification
Focus contrast, weak light scene 1
Focus contrast, weak light scene 1, central magnification
Focus contrast, weak light scene 2
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 2, zoom in below the center (the gap between the big bottom and the super large bottom)
Focus contrast, weak light scene 3
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 3, central magnification
Focus contrast, weak light scene 4
Main camera contrast, weak light scene 4, central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 1
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 2
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 2, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 3
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 3, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scenario 4
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 4, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scenario 5
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 5, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 6
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 6, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 7
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 7, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 8
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 8, central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 1
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 1, central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 2
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 2, central amplification (X70 Pro+ultra wide angle appears similar to Huawei's "AI details" at highlights)
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 3
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 3, central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 4
Ultra wide angle contrast, weak light scene 4, central magnification (Xiaomi 11 Ultra looks at many details, but it can be seen from the building behind that it is actually uncontrollable noise)
"2x zoom" contrast
This section specifically compares the X70 Pro+'s 2x telephoto. In fact, the "2x zoom" of other mobile phones is all for main camera trimming. Theoretically, the most powerful digital cutting is GN2 (Millimeter 11 Ultra) with a unit pixel up to 1.4 μ m. Even if it is double digital cutting, the specification will be twice as strong as most optical long focal point, but the double portrait long focal point of X70 Pro+is F1.6 Zeiss lens.
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 1
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 1, central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 2
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 2, central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 3, central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 4
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 4, central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, Scene 5
"2x zoom" contrast, scene 5, central zoom
"2x zoom" contrast, Scene 6
"2x zoom" contrast, Scene 7
"5x zoom" contrast
This is a happy link. The gap between models is too obvious. You can know the result without looking at it.
However, many people may not know that the 3.3 times telephoto is actually not as practical as the 2.5 times telephoto of the iPhone because it has only 800W pixels and a small aperture.
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 1
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 1, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 2
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 2, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 3, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 4, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 5
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 5, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, Scene 6
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 6, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, Scene 7
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 7, central zoom
"5x zoom" contrast, scene 8, central zoom
Photo summary
vivo X70 Pro+ There may not be one of the highest/best film rate and photography experience in Android camp. The V1 chip is mainly used to improve the viewfinder experience and reduce power consumption, and will not directly improve the actual image quality. The stronger ZEISS lens improves the performance of strong light and backlight scenes.
The white balance of the main camera is yellow and warm, HDR multi frame synthesis is extremely active, noise reduction is excellent, the discrimination is close to X60 Pro+, not very strong, highlight suppression is significantly improved, anti super millet (millet highlights will turn blue), glare control is extremely exaggerated (the degree of fog whitening near the highlight is far less than that of ordinary models);
The algorithm of ultra wide angle becomes stronger, and highlight suppression reaches the dominant level. As long as it is not extremely weak light, it can easily bully the IMX766 ultra wide angle of One Plus 9 Pro;
The periscope telephoto is only the basic line of 5 times light change, and its performance is average. The enhanced 2x portrait lens is very powerful, and it also beats the 2x digital amplification of the super bottom in extremely weak light, which is the strongest near the 2x focal point today (nonsense).
Although the GN1 main camera of vivo X70 Pro+is not the strongest, it has been polished well. The ultra wide angle and 2x telephoto are both top stream level, but the 5x telephoto is weak. If Xiaomi 11 Ultra is 1 to 10 times the focal length The vivo X70 Pro+is strong in the 0.6 to 2 times focal section, and may be the most comprehensive in this focal section 。
Endurance&Charging&Heating
The 4500mAh battery of vivo X70 Pro+has 68% remaining power after a 2.5 hour endurance test of 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" (HDR HD+extreme frames+anti aliasing), 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surfing respectively. In the 2K screen flagship, it is medium to high.
Charging node diagram ↑
Vivo X70 Pro+ Wired and wireless charging are at the normal flagship level The disadvantage is still poor compatibility with general protocols such as PD and QC. When you go out, once you don't have your own fast charging head, you will basically live a 10W life.
The power performance of the vivo X70 Pro+charging cannot be said to be completely different from that of the X60 Pro+. It can only be said to be the same. Just because the battery capacity has increased from 4200mAh to 4500mAh, the total time is 5 minutes longer. The peak value of the vivo X70 Pro+cable is 45.9W, which lasts for about 3 minutes, followed by 35W and 30W. The longest 26W can last for nearly 20 minutes, and it will drop to 10W after 38 minutes.
Vivo X70 Pro+wireless peak (online) is 53.3W, lasting for about 2 minutes. Down is 38W, while 30W can last for more than 33 minutes, and then slowly decline after 38 minutes.
Vivo not only finally has wireless charging, but also runs directly to 50W, almost matching its own wired charging, which will even give you the illusion that "the USB port can be eliminated" (if it is Xiaomi's USB 2.0, it can be removed, but it is USB 3.1, which can still be used). In addition, the launch price of the vivo wireless charger is only 329 yuan (there are 50 discounts for the first launch, and the top configuration is delivered directly from the first launch), which is more sincere than the peers. It is a highly recommended accessory.
Summary: the performance price ratio set off
Light up the screen of vivo X70 Pro+, and each pixel is marked with "all to be".
Vivo X70 Pro+makes up for every regret on X60 Pro+. It has an extra 20g of weight, and has a larger and stronger 2K screen, stronger endurance, better heat dissipation, significantly enhanced 2x telephoto, the most powerful camera with full focus section, nearly killed its own 50W wireless charge with wired charge, and additionally gives you IP68, infrared USB 3.1。
The setting of "adding quantity without adding price" makes the vivo X70 Pro+"forced price performance ratio" The vivo X70 Pro+has maintained the pricing of X50 Pro+/X60 Pro+(in fact, it is "a whole" piece more expensive), but since the 8+128 version was cancelled, the starting price of vivo X70 Pro+has been increased to 5499 yuan, and the 12+512 imperial version for distribution of TWS 2 wireless headphones has been added.
The system of vivo X70 Pro+is still OTA at a speed close to Zhou Geng, and the adaptive refresh rate of "LTPO is lonely", high brush optimization, and the pit of DC dimming are waiting to be filled. Its only "regret" in physics is the large-area ultrasonic fingerprint of fast charging compatibility and "friendly companies", but these also make the vivo X70 Pro+become the flagship of the dark horse Zhenxiang.
Beep
In the evaluation of vivo X70 Pro+, let's talk about something related to video.
The NEX series stopped working, and the X series, which focuses on video, took over the flag of vivo. As we all know, the core of the camera is the sensor and algorithm. In terms of hardware, Sharp R6 at the end of 1 inch and 11 Pro/11 Ultra at the end of 1/1.12 inch are already the limits of mobile phone sensors this year, and the benefits of sensor growth will be significantly reduced.
Next year, the manufacturer will turn to the secondary photography and stacking, and the concept of "multi camera" will become more popular. It is a bit like the CPU changing from single core to multi-core, which is the helplessness after the single core performance hits the ceiling. However, the hardware improvement of the main camera may turn into the field of improving data transmission speed such as on-chip cache (providing conditions for more violent multi frame synthesis algorithm).
in the future Dominant improvement will come from the algorithm level, but the algorithm will lead the battle to another hardware - ISP (Image signal processor). The ISPs that domestic manufacturers began to focus on (Xiaomi MIX FOLD's surging C1, vivo V1 and the rumored OPPO ISP) will not directly improve the actual image quality, but they are carriers of stronger algorithms, focusing on running larger algorithm models at lower power consumption and faster speed.
On the other hand, Google and Apple, which represent the limits of current algorithms, have developed NPU assisted HDR imaging for Pixel 2 series as early as 2017. Pixel 6 series simply developed SoC, while Apple A series chips have developed ISP.
Fortunately, the threshold of ISP is far lower than that of SoC, which gives current domestic manufacturers the ability/opportunity to follow this wave. If mobile phone manufacturers continue to roll in their cameras, they may be able to launch smaller, cheaper and stronger cameras. I have been worried about the introduction of micro single lens/SLR for many years.
When it comes to SoC, Apple, Samsung and Huawei, the top companies, all have their own SoC. Series A, Exynos and Hisense chips are the largest and deepest moat for mobile phone manufacturers. Other manufacturers have to sigh: Previously, the advantage of domestic flagship was to use Qualcomm SoC, but now the regret of domestic flagship is to use Qualcomm SoC. The domestic flagship can only continue to roll in the camera, charge and system.
On the one hand, it is the environment in which the domestic flagship collectively attacks the high-end and recovers lost ground, and on the other hand, it is the aggressive Apple iPhone 13 series that increases the volume and reduces the price. Looking at the 128G iPhone 13 with a price starting from 5999 yuan, some of the domestic flagship brands with expensive but weak cameras almost died on the spot.
Facing the iPhone 13, the top domestic flagship still has advantages in screen, camera (including image quality and focal length), charging and price. After all, their opponent is not the "Thirteen Fragrances", but the "Thirteen Fragrances" with the name of Pro: finally, they wait until the iPhone 13 Pro/13 Pro Max with a 120Hz high brush and a stronger camera.
But even if we don't mention the binding of software ecology, we can know why we don't buy iPhone 13. In the eyes of many people, the advantages of high flash 2K screen, camera, battery life and charging can't compare with the value of device 13 brought by brand premium.
Jackie Chan is right—— Only magic can defeat magic . Domestic flagship lacks brand recognition that takes time to accumulate.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
