There are not many Sony mobile phone users in China, and the Sony logo has its own beliefs, so mainstream media rarely compare Sony and mainstream flagship cameras. We satisfied our curiosity this time and took photos with iPhone 12 Pro Max, Xiaomi 11 Ultra and Sony Xperia 1 III for comparison.
Specifications
Sony Xperia 1 III:
Main camera 1200W, 1/1.7 '', F1.7，24mm，OIS
Ultra wide angle 1200W, 124 degrees, 16mm, 1.4 μ m, 1/2.5 '', F2.2
Variable periscope telephoto, 1200W, 1.25 μ m, 1/2.9 '', capable of switching between 70mm (2.9 times), F2.3 and 105mm (4.4 times), F2.8
iPhone 12 Pro Max：
Main camera 1200W, IMX603，1.7μm，F1.6，26mm， Sensor displacement OIS
Ultra wide angle 1200W, IMX372， 1/3.6''？ Equivalent 13mm, 120 degrees, F2.4
Long focus 2.5 times light change 1200W, IMX613，1/3.4''？， 65mm， F2.2，OIS
Xiaomi 11 Ultra:
Main camera 5000W, Samsung S5KGN2, 1.4 μ m (4 in 1 into 2.8 μ m), 1/1.12 ", 8P lens, OIS，F1.95
Ultra wide angle, IMX586，0.8μm， 1/2 ", 128 degrees, F2.2
5 times telephoto 4800W, IMX586，0.8μm， 1/2 ", split OIS, F4.1127mm
Comparison of main photographic samples
Day scene 1, the eve of heavy rain. Xiaomi's light metering is correct. The iPhone's light metering is on the high side, and the Xperia 1 III is slightly dark.
Daytime scene 1, central zoom in
Daytime scene 2 is also the metering bias of the previous scene
Daytime scene 2, central zoom in
Day Scene 3
Daytime scene 3, central zoom in
Daytime scenario 4
Daytime scene 4, central zoom in
Light Scene 1
Light Scene 2
Indoor lighting scene 1, pay attention to dark details
Indoor lighting scene 1, central magnification
Weak light scene 1. The metering of iPhone is slightly higher than the naked eye, Sonny is slightly darker, and Xiaomi is photographed in the evening
Weak light scene 1, central amplification
Weak light scene 2
Weak light scene 2, central amplification
Ultra wide angle sample comparison
Super wide angle, daytime scene 1
Xiaomi 11 Ultra is the flagship of the largest ultra wide-angle field of vision in service, and the iPhone ultra wide-angle is also famous for its large field of vision, which will be one circle larger than the equivalent 16mm Xperia 1 III.
Ultra wide angle, daytime scene 1, central magnification. However, in terms of discrimination, Sony, with the smallest vision, did not dominate.
Ultra wide angle, light scene 1
Ultra wide angle, light scene 2
Ultra wide angle, lighting scene 2, central magnification.
Ultra wide angle, indoor weak light scene 1
Ultra wide angle, indoor weak light scene 1, central magnification
Ultra wide angle, weak light scene 1
Ultra wide angle, weak light scene 1, central amplification
Ultra wide angle, weak light scene 2
Ultra wide angle, weak light scene 2, central amplification
2.9x vs. 4.4x zoom
According to the commonly used 70mm and 105mm focal sections, Sony has set the Xperia 1 III long focal length at 2.9x and 4.4x magnification (after all, it is a professional pursuit). For this reason, we purposely switched the other two mobile phones to 2.9x and 4.4x zoom in this test.
The Xiaomi 11 Ultra uses the main camera digital cutting before the 3x zoom, and between 3x and 5x will call the sample of the composite 5x telephoto lens. Therefore, when the Xiaomi 11 Ultra 2.9x zoom is used, it is actually the main camera to zoom in and cut, and there is no suspense in this part. When the zoom is 4.4 times, the central area is actually a picture of 5 times the length of the focal head, and there is no suspense in this part.
2.9x zoom, scene 1, central zoom
2.9x zoom, Scene 2, central zoom
2.9x zoom, scene 3, central zoom
2.9x zoom, scene 4, central zoom
2.9x zoom, Scene 5, central zoom
4.4x zoom, Scene 1, central zoom
4.4x zoom, Scene 2, central zoom
4.4x zoom, Scene 3, central zoom
4.4x zoom, Scene 4, central zoom
4.4x zoom, Scene 5, central zoom
Summary
Sony Xperia 1 III has its own imaging style, which I would like to call "Sowei":
The white balance tends to be bluish, like press exposure, and the contrast is slightly higher;
The HDR effect of the main camera and ultra wide angle is "turned on, but not fully turned on". The intensity is very light, and it is easy to lose dark details. The night scene photometry is loyal to the restoration of the naked eye, which is quite different from the mainstream flagship style. The main camera is active in multi frame synthesis, the daubing force is strong, the noise is well controlled, and the discrimination force is weak;
Ultra wide angle and telephoto tend to be yellowish green, and the noise reduction application is also very hard (especially after HDR is triggered). The noise points are well pressed and the discrimination is general. When multi frame synthesis is not triggered, the 4.4x zoom is significantly better than the 2.5x zoom of the iPhone 12 Pro Max, which is still far from the Xiaomi's 5x zoom IMX586.
As for which is higher and which is lower, there will be no more beeps. I think everyone knows that, after all, the gap is obvious enough
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
