Flagships in the first half of the year have all been launched. This time, let's compare the most powerful ultra wide angle camera on which machine. Popular candidates include Huawei Mate 40 Pro OPPO Find X3 Pro、 One plus 9 Pro and vivo X60 Pro+. Which technology has better effect, such as small field lens, free-form surface, main camera level big bottom, micro pan tilt?

Arranged according to the area of ultra wide angle sensor:

OPPO Find X3 Pro and One Plus 9 Pro: all of them are IMX7665000W with free-form surface lens, 1.0 μ m, 1/1.56 ", full pixel omnidirectional focusing, 7P free-form surface lens, equivalent 14mm (actual 110.3 degree field of view), with 4cm macro, F2.2 aperture;

Huawei Mate 40 Pro ↑

Huawei Mate 40 Pro: It is the most special ultra wide-angle lens. It is a large pixel (non all-in-one 1.6 μ m)+3:2 frame+small field of view+large aperture (only this one, the aperture is larger than the main camera's ultra wide angle). It can be understood as the main camera with a slightly larger viewing angle, 2000W, 1.6 μ m, 1/1.54 '', 18mm equivalent focal length, F1.8 aperture. Due to different frames, although the diagonal length is slightly larger than IMX766, the converted area is about 1.33% smaller;

vivo X60 Pro+： It is also the only one, the only micro cloud station with super wide angle. Because the ultra wide angle view is large and relatively insensitive to jitter, most ultra wide angle lenses on mobile phones do not have optical anti shake. The sensor of X60 Pro+is the weakest IMX5984800W, 0.8 μ m, 1/2 ", F2.2， 114 degree wide angle, special lens, no distortion correction.

The reason why Huawei Mate 40 Pro+was not selected (very nervous, sweating: it's certainly not because you don't have the courage to grab it, don't talk nonsense), because its free-form surface lens only has the aperture of F2.4, and its specification is slightly weaker than that of the green manufacturer.

OPPO is consistent with Yijia's ultra wide angle hardware, which is very suitable for comparing algorithm differences (testing Hasu belief). X60 Pro+represents the only "optical anti shake+medium CMOS" scheme. However, the "telephoto ultra wide-angle" of Huawei Mate 40 Pro is really difficult to classify. Those who pursue vision feel that it does not deserve to be called ultra wide-angle, while those who pursue discrimination feel that it is yyds.

These four machines are all immune to edge distortion: Huawei Mate 40 Pro Ultra Wide Angle Field of View is inherently very small (compared with the normal ultra wide angle), so there is no distortion pressure. Find X3 series and One Plus 9 series are due to the free surface lens, and vivo X60 Pro+is also a special lens without distortion correction.

Main camera

Take a look at the performance of the main photographers first, as a reference for ultra wide angle and imaging style.

Here, we will take the trouble to explain that the Huawei Mate 40 Pro's main camera is a native 23mm (used as a 0.8x zoom in the system). When the camera is turned on, it is actually the effect of cutting the main camera digital into 27mm, so the viewing angle is smaller than that of normal mobile phones (now the main camera is generally equivalent to 23mm to 26mm).

Main camera contrast, scene 1

Main camera contrast, scene 1, central magnification

Main camera contrast, scene 2

Main camera contrast, scene 2, central magnification

Main camera contrast, scene 3

Main camera contrast, scene 3, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 1

Main camera contrast, light scene 1, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 2

Main camera contrast, light scene 2, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 3

Main camera contrast, light scene 3, central magnification

Main camera contrast, light scene 4

Main camera contrast, light scene 4, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 5

Main camera contrast, light scene 5, central magnification (Huawei's terrible highlight suppression has never been matched)

Main contrast, light scene 6

Main contrast, light scene 7

Main camera contrast, light scene 7, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 8

Main camera contrast, light scene 8, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 9

Main camera contrast, light scene 9, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 10

Main contrast, light scene 11

Main camera contrast, light scene 11, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 12

Main contrast, light scene 13

Main camera contrast, light scene 13, central magnification

Main contrast, light scene 14

Main camera contrast, light scene 14, central magnification

Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 1

Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 1, central magnification

Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 2

Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 2, central magnification

Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 3

Thematic contrast, extremely weak light scene 3, central amplification (the difference in sensor size is clearly shown in this scene)

Super wide-angle

The largest ultra wide-angle vision is vivo X60 Pro+, followed by Find X3 and One Plus 9 Pro. Mate40 Pro has a small field of vision. Due to the 3:2 frame ratio, it is even worse. It is narrower vertically ↓

Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 1

Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, lower left corner edge enlarged

Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, lower right corner edge enlarged

Except for the Find X3 Pro, other machines are deteriorated to some extent at the extreme edges of the four corners. Yijia: My father left something behind.

Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, central magnification

Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 2

Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 3

Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 3, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 1

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 1, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 2

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 2, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 3

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 3, central magnification (one plus the lower left corner, this scene can not be focused after several shots)

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 4

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 4, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 5

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 5, central magnification

Super wide angle contrast, light scene 5, zoom in below the center

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 6

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 7

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 7, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 8

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 8, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 9

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 9, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 10

Ultra wide angle contrast, light scene 10, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 11

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 11, central magnification

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 12

Ultra wide angle contrast, lighting scene 13

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 1

Vivo really squeezed the IMX598 dry. It is a lower level, giving a very weak light performance. In Huawei, F1.8 aperture is superimposed on the bottom (the other three are F2.2), which is not in the same dimension.

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 1, zoom in on the left side of the center

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 2

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 2, central amplification

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 3

Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 3, central amplification (Mate 40 Pro ultra wide angle has high picture brightness, but it sacrifices discrimination. If you add it, the noise will not hold.)

summary

There is little suspense about the strength of the main camera:

Mate 40 Pro's analytical power and highlight suppression are exaggerated, and there are still few rivals after it is released for half a year;
The vivo X60 Pro+has the best photo taking experience, the most stable white balance (uniform warm/red yellow is enough), the specially adjusted contrast, excellent noise reduction, but the perspective is large and the painting force is strong, resulting in the picture details being the weakest among several sets;
The OnePlus 9 Pro has the unique blue and cold white balance of "Blues Hasselblad". It is very hard to sharpen and has a strong sense of oil painting. After OTA, it partially solves the problem of noise, but the time for multi frame synthesis is getting longer and longer. The photo taking experience is average, and the overall quality is slightly weaker than that of top class flagship;
The OPPO Find X3 Pro photo experience is second only to the X60 Pro+, with fast shutter response and high film rate, which is very comfortable. The warm yellow green color and white balance make the picture more natural, but the bottom is still too small. Tolerance and noise control are Buddhist.

The ultra wide angle sorting is as follows:

Find X3 Pro There is no one of the best super wide angle under normal concept. The imaging style is that of the main camera. The Buddhist noise reduction (but far better than the noise free 1-plus 9-Pro ultra wide angle), yellowish green white balance, and stronger than normal highlight suppression and tolerance (relative to ultra wide angle);
vivo X60 Pro+ The ultra wide angle field of view is slightly larger than that of the green factory, and the noise reduction coating is applied with force, resulting in the poor discrimination. After all, it is at the bottom of 1/2 ". When the light weakens, the detail degradation speed is higher than Find X3, and the tolerance is also weak, which can not be remedied by the micro PTZ. Its advantages are high hair color saturation, high contrast and pleasing to the eye;
One plus 9 Pro: I thought it would be similar to Find X3, but it is the algorithm that has slowed down (Hasu aura has not covered the ultra wide angle yet?). The photographing experience is close to the super wide angle of Mate 40 Pro (multi frame synthesis is really slow). The focus logic is occasionally confused, noise is unrestrained, and the dark part of the big backlight scene can not be pulled up sometimes. Low EQ: Unfortunately for hardware. High EQ: there is room for progress and potential.

Huawei Mate 40 Pro (Abnormal models do not participate in the ranking). Every time I compare them, I will repeat the feeling that this vision is lonely in a super wide angle. For scenes that cannot be covered by the main camera, this 0.7 times super wide angle is also impossible to cover (note that it is still 0.7 times 27mm... the normal mobile phone is 0.6 times 24mm, and the actual difference is much larger than the figure seems). However, Huawei's algorithm is really too strong. In addition to the white balance floating, such highlights are suppressed and such details are really unmatched. If you can have a bigger vision, it will kill you. It's a pity.

Finally, we can apply the conclusion of the X60 Pro+evaluation that year: mobile photography lovers are suffering. Even though their wallets are getting thinner, the strongest main camera, super wide-angle camera and super telephoto camera will always be scattered on different machines. You can only make a choice according to Jiao Duan's preference. I hope you can choose the right mobile phone.

"Children make choices, adults all want", This is used by adults to cheat children. Adults are just good at choosing 。

Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer

Follow our WeChat official account: playphone

Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer