In addition to the iPhone 12 Pro Max, the strongest models of all manufacturers in 2020 have been launched. This photo horizontal review compares the actual performance of Huawei Mate40 Pro, the new flagship of photography, and the iPhone 12 Pro improved by increasing aperture, A14 and algorithm. The reference model is Xiaomi 10 Ultra, the top player of DxOMark, and the balanced flagship OPPO Find X2 Pro at the beginning of the year.
Specifications
Huawei Mate40 Pro vs. P40 Pro:
The main camera is still the strongest CMOS IMX700, 1.22 with 50 million pixels μ m. 4 in 1 to 2.44 μ m. RYYB+full pixel 8-core focusing, but OIS (black question mark) is canceled;
Ultra wide angle from IMX608 (1.12 μ m. 1/1.54 '', 40 megapixel) replaced by 1.6 μ m. 20 megapixel CMOS at 3:2 (the model is unknown, DxOMark said it is still 1/1.54 ");
The 5x ultra long focal length should be the same as the P40 Pro RYYB sensor (DxOMark said it was 1/3.56 ", and the unit pixel size was calculated to be 1 μ M).
Note that the Huawei Mate40 Pro is the same as the P40 Pro in that the main camera hardware has an equivalent focal length of 23mm, but the actual output is 27mm after trimming (controlling the edge image quality and providing the trimming margin required for multi frame synthesis), and all zooms are based on 27mm. Five times long focal length is physical equivalent 125mm (125mm/23mm=5.43 times), and the actual output superimposed digital zoom is 135mm equivalent focal length (135mm/27mm=5 times).
The improvement of iPhone 12 Pro can be said in one sentence, F1.6 aperture+A14+algorithm (previous generation F1.8). The hardware of ultra wide angle and 2x telephoto has not changed, but now ultra wide angle also has super night view mode;
The Xiaomi 10 Ultra main camera is second only to the IMX700 on the big bottom. Howei OV48C, 48 million pixels, 1.2 μ m. 4 in 1 into 2.4 μ m. 1/1.32 '', a more thorough dual native ISO, but without dual core focusing, should be the mobile phone CMOS with the highest physical tolerance. Up to 128 degrees of ultra wide angle (IMX3502 million pixels, 1.0 μ m) And IMX586 (48 megapixel, 0.8 μ m) 5 times light variable super telephoto at monster level;
OPPO Find X2 Pro's main camera is IMX68948 megapixel, 1.12 μ m. 4 in 1 into 1.24 μ m. 1/1.43 '', full pixel omni focus, dual native ISO. It's a compromise between IMX700 and OV48C. It's smaller, but I have got both dual ISO and dual core focusing. Ultra wide angle is the "all-in-one" conscience CMOS IMX586 (48 million pixels, 0.8 μ m) With 5 times light variation of 8 million pixels.
The zoom war of flagship mobile phones has impacted the telescope market. In addition to the famous "super telephoto grabbing traitors by mistake" in the circle of aircraft, the usage rate of the super telephoto is not high at ordinary times, which is like Mate30 Pro/P40 Pro (4000W), Mate40 Pro (2000W, 1.6 μ m) OPPO Find X2 Pro/One Plus 8 Pro (IMX586) is much more practical for users to stack materials on ultra wide angles.
Test description
To facilitate browsing, the "central magnification" samples are all magnified at a high magnification, without the need for a second click. However, this does not mean that the photography of these machines is poor, or that the gap between them is small, but that the magnification is too exaggerated.
If a little careful comparison is needed Love to play computer games If you browse the official website, you can click the "non central enlarged sample" to view the large picture. The focus of all samples is at the center of the picture. Except for the super night view mode specifically described, all other models are fully automatic.
Ultra long focal contrast
The iPhone 12 Pro has only a 2x optical zoom, and the other three have about 5x optical zoom.
Ultra long focal contrast 1
Because Huawei's focus benchmarks are different, the Huawei Mate40 Pro is 135mm after digital zoom is superimposed, and the Xiaomi 10 Ultra and OPPO Find X2 Pro are 123-125mm. Therefore, the field of vision of Huawei Mate40 Pro is slightly smaller than the 5 times zoom of Xiaomi and OPPO.
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 1, central magnification (the white balance is closest to the real Xiaomi 10 Ultra and OPPO Find X2 Pro)
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 2, central magnification
Huawei Mate40 Pro's RYYB method is good. Although the white balance has drifted a little, and the actual picture details are not as rich as Xiaomi 10 Ultra (IMX586 has not exhausted its efforts, and the 2x digital zoom after 5x light change has not been used), Huawei's noise reduction algorithm is very strong, clean and sharp, and the first impression is excellent.
Huawei Mate40 Pro and Xiaomi 10 Ultra, 10 times zoom contrast (in terms of picture details, 10 times Xiaomi 10 Ultra is stronger)
Ultra long focus contrast, Scene 3, above the center (the white balance is the closest to the real one, Xiaomi 10 Ultra and OPPO Find X2 Pro)
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 3, center right
Ultra long focus contrast, Scene 4 (the closest white balance is OPPO Find X2 Pro)
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 4, central amplification (the Xiaomi 10 Ultra that triggers HDR, the white balance directly drifts, while the Mate40 Pro drifts in another direction)
Ultra long focus contrast, Scene 5 (the white balance is the closest to the real, or OPPO Find X2 Pro)
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 5, central magnification
Ultra long focus contrast, Scene 6 (the closest white balance is the iPhone 12 Pro and Mate40 Pro)
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 6, central amplification (highlight suppression of Huawei Mate40 Pro is quite strong)
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 1
The 12mm UWA of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is in sharp contrast to the 18mm UWA of Huawei Mate40 Pro. Huawei Mate40 Pro's 18mm ultra wide angle is too limited in the field of vision, and has lost the flavor of ultra wide angle. Many scenes have to be settled back (Mate40 Pro+is a 14mm freeform surface ultra wide angle, but the aperture is only F2.4). Essentially, it is more like the second main camera, which is capable of discriminating all ultra wide angles (except P40/Mate30), but its vision is tight.
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 1, central magnification
Super wide angle contrast, Scene 1, zoomed in at the bottom of the center (the super wide angle of the iPhone 12 Pro is still very fleshy)
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 2 (pay attention to the difference of field of vision)
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 2, central magnification
"Huawei Mate40 Pro, you see, from vision, distortion to discrimination, which is like ultra wide-angle". Use the perspective to change the power of discrimination, so that when it counts hair, it can't recognize the mother of the same trade.
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 3
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 3
When the same object ↑ is magnified proportionally, it can be intuitively compared that the number of pixels allocated to the same scene by Huawei Mate40 Pro is far more than the normal ultra wide-angle lens, and the weak discrimination is the reason why there is a ghost.
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 3, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scenario 4
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 4, central magnification
Ultra wide angle comparison, scenario 5
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 5, central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, Scene 5, zoom in at the top of the center
Ultra wide angle comparison, scene 6 (too big difference in field of vision)
Ultra wide angle contrast, scene 6, central magnification
Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 7 (iPhone 12 Pro successfully counterattacked with a 3-second automatic super slow shutter)
Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 7, zoomed in at the top of the center (iPhone 12 Pro: give me 3 seconds, I can beat IMX350)
Ultra wide angle contrast, extremely weak light scene 7, central amplification (IMX586, even if the super night scene is not triggered, OPPO Find X2 Pro can easily override the normal ultra wide angle)
Subjective contrast
Main camera contrast, scene 1, central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 1, zoom in below the center
Main camera contrast, scene 2
Main camera contrast, scene 2, zoom in on the right side of the center
Main camera contrast, scene 2, central magnification
Thematic contrast, scene 3 (at the highlight, Huawei Mate40 Pro is the closest to the naked eye)
Main camera contrast, scene 3, central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 4
Comparison of main camera, scene 4 (the main camera field of Huawei Mate40 Pro and Xiaomi 10 Ultra are the smallest and largest among several sets respectively, which is also the choice of field of view and discrimination)
Main camera contrast, scene 4, central magnification
Main camera contrast, Scene 5
Main camera contrast, scene 5, central magnification
For subjective comparison, Scene 5 is magnified on the right side of the center (the confident Xiaomi 10 Ultra did not trigger HDR and almost lost to the iPhone)
Main camera contrast, Scene 6
Main camera contrast, scene 6, central amplification (the white balance of OPPO Find X2 Pro and Xiaomi 10 Ultra is correct, but the metering of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is significantly higher)
Main camera contrast, Scene 7
Main camera contrast, scene 7, zoom in at the top of the center
Main camera contrast, scene 7, zoom in at the bottom of the center (iPhone killed)
Main camera contrast, scene 8 (Xiaomi 10 Ultra's tolerance is strong enough to explode, as seen by the naked eye, it is like iPhone and OPPO Find X2 Pro)
Main camera contrast, scene 8, central magnification
Main camera contrast, scene 9
Main camera contrast, scene 9, zoom in at the top of the center (the big light ratio scene is still Xiaomi's 10 Ultra, but the white balance can't be stretched)
Main camera contrast, scene 9, central magnification
Focus contrast, extremely weak light scene 10
Main camera contrast, extremely weak light scene 10, zoom in at the top of the center
Main camera contrast, extremely weak light scene 10, central magnification (there is a saying that the iPhone's super night view is really good, give me 3 seconds, and immediately return to the mainstream flagship level)
Thematic contrast, extremely weak light scene 11
Main camera contrast, extremely weak light scene 11, zoomed in at the top of the center (under extreme scenes, the night vision meter Xiaomi 10 Ultra is more powerful)
Main camera contrast, extremely weak light scene 11, central magnification
summary
The waterfall screen of Huawei Mate40 Pro is accidentally touched when taking photos, and the yield is relatively high. In addition to the shake of the viewfinder frame, it is hard to find that it does not have optical anti shake:
Main camera: 4 in 1 up to 2.44 μ M's RYYB outsole, coupled with ferocious multi frame synthesis and highlight suppression, even if the optical anti shake is eliminated, the combat power is still strong (P40 Pro: My OIS, lost to Kirin 9000 and the new algorithm?). The white balance is greatly improved, but the overall accuracy is not as good as OPPO Find X2 Pro and Xiaomi 10 Ultra;
Ultra wide angle: it is a "second-hand main camera, false main camera", very strong, extremely weak light can be played, but the field of vision is really "narrow". The power of discrimination and perspective are closer to the normal subjectivity, and compared with other super wide-angle power of discrimination, it is a textbook style of not talking about martial ethics. "Vision or discrimination, is a question". Maybe the new sensor is not adjusted well, the white balance is not as stable as RYYB, sharpening is very hard, the details are a little poor, and there is still room for squeezing progress;
Ultra long focus: stable shooting, strong noise reduction, active HDR and multi frame synthesis, and weak light can also be triggered. It is obviously stronger than the ordinary 5 times light variation, extreme hair count and weak light performance. It is not the rival of Xiaomi 10 Ultra, but its performance is surprising (the latter's white balance, Schrodinger's HDR and unrestrained noise reduction drag down scores).
The iPhone 12 Pro photo experience is still invincible, but "this year's toothpaste is peppermint flavor". Apple's photo has to wait for the iPhone 12 Pro Max to take a look. The super wide-angle field of vision is large, and the slow shutter of the weak light scene for several seconds is not free, but it is still obviously weak. It has been said that this set of hardware has been optimized by God and has made great progress, from "can not be used at all" to "shoot a bright" level (and close to the level of night vision instrument). The main photography of night scene has slightly improved, but the monster sensor ratio of Android flagship is still too poor. IPhone 12 Pro: Anyway, I started at 8499 yuan. Why should I take photos compared with 6000 Android or even the Xiaomi 10 Ultra in its early 5000 years?
Xiaomi 10 Ultra is also an extreme tolerance night vision+telescope. When HDR is triggered, although the white balance will float with a high probability, the dynamic range will burst, and the dark details are far beyond the naked eye. The circle of friends needs such players. Focusing is still the bellows, which is slow in film formation, and the field of vision is not as wide as the opponent's ultra wide angle, sacrificing discrimination and weak light performance. In addition, Xiaomi 10 Ultra photography is very balanced. For my own use, I will still rank first. Only Mate40 Pro+has the opportunity to threaten its status (sorry, the hardware improvement of iPhone 12 Pro Max is not enough, and taking photos is a big chance that I will not be the first).
The photo taking experience of OPPO Find X2 Pro is the closest to that of iPhone, where to focus, the film rate is high, and the shutter response of weak light scenes is also fast. After all, it is a product at the beginning of the year. The absolute picture quality of the main camera and super wide angle has been exceeded by different models. The HDR trigger is not active, and the ultra wide angle even "disdains" to use the conventional night view mode in extremely low light. It may be that for the sake of photographing experience, many opportunities of multi frame synthesis have been given up. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a school of balance. Each item is not the strongest, but none is particularly weak. It is a rare realist in this era. Photometry and white balance should be as close to reality as possible and faithfully restored. For most scenes, if you want to know what the real scene is like, just look at the sample of OPPO Find X2 Pro.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
