Although Xiaomi 10 Ultra has changed from the girl next door to Xiaomi 10 to a muscular man (and there is no color matching for him), Xiaomi 10 Ultra is indeed one of the most balanced and suitable domestic flagship brands today, and is a popular candidate to inherit the title of "nail family" of Xiaomi 6. The following are the test results of the 120Hz screen, the new Dark Eye+120x zoom, 120W wired charging+55W wireless charging and one month's use experience.
parameter
The most complete storage version is ceramic black color:
The transparent version does not have the emperor version of 16+512 (large capacity flash memory requires more cloth board area, but there is not enough room for transparency?)
The bright silver version only has the emperor version of 16+512 (guess from this setting, the cost of bright silver is the highest. Therefore, if the top configuration is required, bright silver has the highest cost performance)
This year's ceramic black is not all ceramic (200nm ceramic coating), and the transparent version does not have the decorative circuit board of the first generation transparent version, but the three versions are all the same price and weight.
parts
Although it is a supreme commemorative edition, the packaging is quite plain (at first glance, I thought I bought a silver version of Tailiang).
The first mass production 120W charging head, MDY-12-ED, supports 5V 3A, 9V 3A, 11V 6A, 20V 6A. For the USB-A port that has been radically modified, there are PD pin mapping and orange tongue. Compatible with PD/QC, PD can run up to 20V 3.25A (65W), can charge the notebook, and is a good universal head. If there is any shortcoming, it is necessary to change the A port line, otherwise the PD will be abandoned.
From left to right, and from top to bottom, there are Xiaomi 10 Ultra 120W quick charger (182.45g), Xiaomi 65W quick charger (110g), Huawei 40W quick charger (85g), and Apple's "Five Happiness and One Safety" super environmental protection and safety quick charger (25.87g). The weight and size of the Xiaomi 10 Ultra quick charger is similar to the previous 65W non gallium nitride notebook charger.
appearance
Transparent Xiaomi 10 Ultra and Phnom Penh Xiaomi 10 Pro
Transparent Xiaomi 10 Ultra and Phnom Penh Xiaomi 10 Pro
The front side cannot distinguish Xiaomi 10 Ultra from Xiaomi 10. If you like the visual effect of high screen proportion, it is recommended to choose bright silver (but only the emperor version), ceramic black and black middle frame of transparent plate, so the visual width will suffer.
The middle frame is slightly thicker, the antenna slot position is greatly changed, the opening of the top speaker is narrowed (the double speakers are no longer symmetrical), and the microphone and infrared transmitter are moved. It is really like the muscle swelling after fitness.
The back cover of Xiaomi 10 Ultra transparent version is the most complex of several versions, mainly including the transparent back cover printed with circuit texture+real NFC and wireless charging wire coil.
Seriously, in terms of face value, I still think Xiaomi 10/10 Pro is higher, the camera model is normal, and there are many color choices. For Xiaomi 10 Ultra, the transparent version is highly recognizable and has a Geek flavor. However, if you want to shock the proportion of the screen, it is recommended to choose Bright Silver; If you like simplicity, it is recommended to choose Bright Silver; If you like coquettish, it is recommended to choose Bright Silver.
Fingerprint identification&volume/sound quality&vibration&workmanship&feel
Fingerprint identification, vibration motor and workmanship are close to those of Xiaomi 10 Pro, and the flagship is normal.
Volume/sound quality: The huge ultra long focal mode set makes it impossible to retain the symmetrical speaker settings. Xiaomi 10 Ultra has changed from the most powerful music (external) phone in the universe to a normal phone. The sound quality of the main speaker changes little, but after the top speaker weakens, the gap between the volume and the bottom is a little obvious, and the symmetry is general.
Touch: The middle frame is slightly higher than the upper and lower glass, round and comfortable. In the case of being thick and heavy, the thickness has increased from 8.96mm to 9.45mm, and the weight has increased from 208g to 221.8g. The back cover has "muscle expansion", which is more supportive. When you change from 10U to m10, you will find that your mobile phone seems to be lighter (in fact, it is the effect of weight lifting exercise that makes you stronger).
The honorable 120X zoom camera matrix has a huge area, not very high bulge, and a normal grip. However, they are not friendly to left handers, and the super wide angle at the bottom is bound to be touched frequently.
screen
Xiaomi 10 Ultra, a 6.67 inch 2340 × 1080, 120Hz, hyperboloid AMOLED screen with holes punched in the upper left corner, is produced by CSOT, a native 10bit panel, HDR10+， Support MEMC, official standard 1120 nit peak, 240Hz touch sampling rate. Touch IC is still STC, and 180Hz touch sampling is used daily, and 240Hz is used in game.
On the left is the Xiaomi 10 Ultra Chinese Star photoelectric screen, and on the right is the Xiaomi 10 Pro Samsung screen
All are Pentile arrays, but CSOT is the landmark "quadrangular star red sub-pixel+slightly convex blue sub-pixel", and the opening ratio (the ratio of effective light transmission area to total area) is significantly higher than Samsung.
The brightness of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is normal. In addition to changing the contrast setting under the MIUI strong light, the readability in the sun is OK (when other parameters remain unchanged, the smaller the A-screen lighting area, the higher the brightness. The smaller the aperture of the luminance meter, the higher the local luminance can be measured. The aperture of our luminance meter is 17.5mm, and the results are as follows).
The manual global maximum brightness is 401 nits, the upper, lower, left, right and four corner brightness is 397-397-408-410 nits, and the local maximum brightness is 472 nits;
Automatic global maximum brightness is 608 nits, the bottom of the highest brightness reaches 650 nits, and the local brightness is 803 nits (the four corners are 803, which seems to be the panel limit).
The automatic brightness stability of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is about the same as that of Xiaomi 10 Pro, which is the flagship level of normal. All Xiaomi 10 series are dual light sensors. The light sensor under the flash connected to Xiaomi 10 Ultra can also stimulate high brightness. When playing mobile phones on the beach, the automatic brightness can also keep up (I can't think of any obvious difference in other scenes).
SRGB color accuracy in adaptive mode (mainly yellow and red color)
Adaptive mode P3 color accuracy (mainly red color deviation)
Vivid mode P3 color accuracy (red, green and blue are biased)
Primary color mode sRGB color accuracy (the red color is relatively more biased)
The adjustable items are the same as the Xiaomi 10 Pro on the Samsung screen, which provides "adaptive, bright, primary color, and advanced mode". The advanced mode has four internal modes of "bright, primary color, P3, and sRGB", and the "three primary colors, hue, saturation, lightness, contrast, and gamma value" can be adjusted.
The gamma value and grayscale are both good (the closer the daily standard gamma is to 2.2, the better, if it is too low, the picture will be gray, but the dark details will be more abundant). Refer to the above color level chart to see the specific performance of color level in different modes (the longer the horizontal bar, the more serious the deviation):
It can be set in the default adaptive mode in daily life. Its color accuracy performance in the sRGB and P3 color gamut is better than that in the bright mode, both of which are around 7400K color temperature. On the sRGB side, 127.9% color gamut coverage, 2.21 gamma value, 2.9 gray scale deviation, average color deviation 3.9, maximum deviation 6.4. On P3 side, 96% of the color gamut covers, the average color deviation is 4.2, and the maximum deviation is 7.9.
Those who prefer accurate color use primary color mode, 6394K color temperature, 94.7% sRGB coverage, 2.28 gamma value, 2.3 gray scale deviation, 2.7 average color deviation, and 4.4 maximum deviation. The color accuracy is pretty good, but it's a little dim.
The bright mode does not perform well. It does not follow the P3 tone. You can ignore this mode. Under P3 color gamut, 99.7% P3 coverage, 2.3 gamma value, 2.5 gray scale deviation, average color deviation of 5, maximum deviation of 8.8, slightly obvious deviation.
Whether it means "Samsung investment or domestic rise", the quality of this CSOT screen is solid.
Compared with the Xiaomi 10 Pro screen, the uniformity of the Xiaomi 10 Ultra CSOT screen in our hand is slightly worse than that of the Samsung screen. The small angle will slightly turn green, but the overall appearance is similar. In the adaptive mode, the front side is blue and the big angle is yellow green (the front side of Xiaomi 10 Pro is magenta and the big angle is blue). However, small differences in hair color will be covered up by individual differences and mode adjustment on the screen, with limited impact. However, under the current Android system and ecosystem, the 10Bit screen can not play its role in testing or with the naked eye, and the perception is not strong for the time being.
Compared with the lower level Samsung E3 screen of the Redmi K30 Ultra, the Xiaomi 10 Ultra screen is more transparent. Even the system wallpaper, the color detail level is richer than that of the K30U (it can only be found when viewed together). The most obvious daily perception is the 120Hz refresh rate. Although the performance is the same as that of Xiaomi 10, the improved refresh rate gives a faster feeling (that is, the sliding damping of the current version of the system is too large, which is not happy enough).
It is hoped that in the future, some manufacturers will add another 90Hz gear between 60Hz and 120Hz, which can be triggered under different electric quantities to balance power consumption and smoothness, and try to avoid "returning to the 60Hz PPT world overnight".
System and performance
System part:
After all, the Xiaomi 10 Ultra is a Snapdragon 865. Even with the early firmware, 120Hz can withstand it. After OTA twice, except for the occasional frame drop when loading the evil negative screen, most occasions are smooth. Fortunately, Android 11 is not available. There is still a problem with the application compatibility of the latter (Android 11 in Xiaomi 10 Pro development version, DJI Fly and some bank apps still flash back, and there is also a problem of high power consumption).
What else can be said about the MIUI that needs to be returned after half a lifetime? In the era when all manufacturers have started to increase push and advertising, advertising is no longer a big problem for MIUI (it is all supported by friends). The main problem now is that the huge amount of high frame animation of "120Hz MIUI 12" has squeezed the endurance. The endurance of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is obviously weaker than that of Xiaomi 10 with MIUI11. At this stage, the development version of Xiaomi 10+MIUI 12+Android 11 is even worse (don't ask me how to know).
However, it is MIUI after all. OTA should improve the endurance, but we still hope that the speed of internal testing of the Xiaomi 10 Ultra and K30 Ultra development versions can be improved. Until the deadline of September 28, the application for the development version has not been opened, and ordinary root users are overwhelmed.
Competitor model
CPU test
GPU test
Flash memory read/write test
This year, most of the domestic manufacturers did not participate in the Snapdragon 865 Plus, and they mainly relied on the appearance to extend the life of the Snapdragon 865 (Qualcomm's toothpaste was also ineffective, the ideal state was improved by 9%, and the daily state could not be perceived).
In addition to the default peak value of 587MHz, the Adreno 650 of Xiaomi 10 Ultra also has two gears of 725MHz and 670MHz (Snapdragon 865+). However, for the time being, only a few whitelisted apps such as Anthare can reach 725MHz, and even 3DMark and GFXBench can only run at 587MHz. It is totally "Tuyile" mode, which is reserved for third-party ROMs and modules to play.
The actual CPU control of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is more conservative than that of Xiaomi 10 Pro, and the GPU is slightly stronger (the difference between one frame of second kill and two frames of hanging hit). However, after upgrading from UFS 3.0 to UFS 3.1, the 256GB Xiaomi 10 Ultra has a sustained read and write speed that is slightly faster than the 512GB Xiaomi 10 Pro, and can open a gap in random read and write (when the situation is consistent, the larger the flash capacity, the faster the speed). If you are interested, you can go to Love to play computer games Running points library Taste it carefully, and I won't repeat it here.
photograph
The Xiaomi 10 Ultra has replaced the "good domestic product" OV48C (rumored to be a mid core OEM) with the "right direction". It is the real "eye of the dark night". With the original dual ISO, the image tolerance and HDR video have been greatly improved. The 10bit Rec.2020 HDR10 video recording capability can also use the Xiaomi 10 Ultra 10bit screen.
This year, in addition to the IMX700 used by Huawei, there are also two big bottom CMOS chips, "IMX689 and Samsung S5KGN1", which are respectively equipped with one plus 8 Pro (and Find X2 Pro) and vivo X50 Pro+(and iQOO 5 series).
Because there are too many proofs, the proofs of the ultra wide angle/telephoto/ultra telephoto part have been simplified, and the previous articles can be viewed for the complete proofs "Comparison of Subordinate Photographs: Xiaomi 10 Supreme, One Plus 8 Pro, vivo X50 Pro+" ；
The original and spliced samples have been uploaded to Baidu disk link: Extraction code: igao；
If you want to view it on the official website of Ainongji, click the picture to view the large picture.
Camera parameters
Xiaomi 10 Pro is an optical anti shake Samsung S5KHMX, 108 million pixels, 1/1.33 ", 0.8 μ m (4 in 1 into 1.6 μ m), F1.69。 Although it is said that the direction is wrong, the big bottom is equipped with F1.69 aperture (the quality of the lens is not up to standard, and the poor control of the smart difference causes the edge of the near object shooting to be easily blurred). If it is completely completed, it is still very strong. The double focal length is also strong, giving 1.4 μ m+F2.0 aperture. The ultra long focus is not periscope type, the actual optical zoom is about 3.7 times, and the parameters are ordinary. Ultra wide angle has the advantage of high pixels, but the angle of view is small;
Xiaomi 10 Ultra is an optical anti shake OV48C (dual native ISO, 12bit video, full link HDR10), 4800W, 1/1.32 ", 1.2 μ m (4in 1 into 2.4 μ m), F1.85, 8P lens. The previously strong 2x telephoto has been completely retained, and the ultra wide angle of view has increased to 128 degrees, equivalent to 12mm (15mm for Xiaomi 10 Pro and 14mm for iPhone 11 Pro Max). The ultra long focal length is also very strong. Like the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, it has the IMX586, and it is 4.8 times the actual light variable value (but the aperture is reduced to F4.1).
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle, daytime scene (during the shooting of the sample, the light has changed, and it is impossible to compare the white balance and metering)
Ultra wide angle, daytime scene, central amplification (during the shooting of the sample, the light has changed, and it is impossible to compare the white balance and metering)
One plus 8 Pro ultra wide angle 4800W mode, compared with other machines
In the default mode, Xiaomi 10 Pro is more powerful in super wide angle discrimination, and one plus 8 Pro is more tolerant. But as soon as the 4800W mode of 8 Pro is opened (the sample even has some sharpening), it will be reversed.
Comparison of the lower right corner of ultra wide angle sample sheet
The ultra wide-angle camera of one plus 8 Pro has a large bottom and good lens, and the edge image quality is better than Xiaomi 10 Pro, Xiaomi 10 Ultra and X50 Pro+.
The angle of view of the ultra wide-angle lens is compared, and the Xiaomi 10 Ultra wide-angle field of view is significantly larger by one circle
Ultra wide angle lens, size comparison of the same object
Xiaomi 10 Pro is high in pixels (2000W), and the same object can be divided into more pixels, which has a natural advantage in discrimination. The Xiaomi 10 Ultra has a wide angle, so the pixel advantage is spread evenly into the field of vision advantage.
Ultra wide angle lens, indoor scene 2
Ultra wide angle lens, indoor scene 2, central magnification
Ultra wide angle lens, indoor scene 3, central magnification
Ultra wide angle lens, lighting scene
Ultra wide angle lens, lighting scene, central magnification
After the light becomes worse, the pixel advantage of the Xiaomi 10 Pro will be weakened, and even surpassed by the Xiaomi 10 Ultra with a larger wide-angle (this is metaphysics, and the algorithm of the new machine will be improved?). The X50 Pro+'s ultra wide angle performance throughout the whole process is excellent and normal.
The super wide angle of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is exaggerated in its perspective, and its dark light performance has also been improved to a certain extent. The lens quality is OK. On the one plus 8 Pro side, although the default mode is only 1200W pixels, the whole process has the advantages of image brightness and noise control brought by the big bottom. It's just that 1200W pixels are too low, and the 4800W mode cannot open a wide gap.
Comparison between long focus and ultra long focus
Comparison of 2x telephoto lens (one plus 8 Pro is about 2.2 times), scene 1
The one plus 8 Pro with larger optical magnification will naturally take advantage of the 2-to-3x zoom, followed by two millets with 1.4 μ m bottom, and the S5KGD1SM with X50 Pro+is the weakest (although there is 1.6 mm unit pixel size after 4in1, there is only 800 W pixels left).
Ultra long focal head contrast, scene 2, 5 times zoom (one plus 8 Pro does not have the lens of this focal section, actually it is a 2.2 times long focal length digital cutting)
The zoom contrast of Xiaomi 10 Pro is 2x, 5x, 10x and 50x. This story once again tells us that digital cutting beyond the scope of optical zoom is useless.
Xiaomi 10 Ultra's 5x, 5x zoom 48 megapixel mode, 10x, 120x zoom contrast
According to exif information, the limit zoom of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is 122.56 times (3064mm/25mm). It seems that the equivalent focal length of the main camera should be slightly greater than 25mm. At present, the biggest problem of Xiaomi 10 Ultra telephoto is that it is difficult to focus on a distant target when shooting at 120 times telephoto, and it needs an iron hand or a tripod.
Xiaomi 10 Ultra's ultra long focal discrimination is significantly improved compared with Xiaomi 10 Pro. In this scene, for the first time, a "telescope" can clearly see the supporting rod of the iron tower. As for how to choose:
The 48 megapixel mode has a very light processing trace, but it retains a lot of picture details, and the field of vision should also be greater than 10 times zoom. Jilao recommends using the 48 megapixel mode with 5 times zoom;
If it is used by ordinary people, it is better to use 10 times zoom at most. If it goes up, it will waste the picture field of vision and "increase the power consumption". It is better to work hard to stare at the target with an iron hand than to cut by yourself after 10 times zoom.
2x telephoto contrast, Scene 1. The following is a comparison of the super telephoto of the same scene.
Ultra long focus contrast, light scene 1 (one plus 8 Pro only has 2.2 light changes, Xiaomi 10 Pro only has 3.7 times).
2x telephoto contrast, Scene 2. The following is a comparison of the super telephoto of the same scene.
Ultra long focus contrast, scene 2 (one plus 8 Pro only has 2.2 light changes, Xiaomi 10 Pro only has 3.7 times)
Weak light scene, double focus contrast (Xiaomi 10 Pro, the only one that does not trigger multi frame synthesis here...). The following is a comparison of the super telephoto of the same scene.
Ultra long focus contrast, weak light scene
Summary of long focal length
For the telephoto side, most mobile phones now use 48 million, or even 64 million pixels. They can achieve the effect of 2x zoom through the main camera digital cutting, which is enough to replace the ordinary 2x telephoto lens. Therefore, the telephoto head in this era has to have more than twice the optical variable lens, telephoto imaging beyond the main camera, or, like Xiaomi 10 Pro, it is used to fill the defect of "too serious brightness difference in near object shooting".
It is more suitable for taking portraits and near objects with a 2x telephoto. Two Xiaomi are more powerful (the same hardware, different tuning, Xiaomi 10 Pro is more powerful than sharpening). The S5K2L7, a 1.4 μ m pixel sensor, can still play today. With the addition of 8 Pro, the actual performance of the telephoto is OK because it has 2.2 times the magnification. However, the X50 Pro+'s 2 times zoom head is a bit soy sauce. After all, the 5000W output of the main camera can also achieve similar results.
For ultra long focus lenses, it is better to say that they "only increase power consumption", and it is better to say that they increase the possibility. Domestic manufacturers have embarked on the arms race of zoom in an all-round way. It is expected that there will be high magnification continuous zoom models next year, but the starting magnification is generally more than 5 times, which will also take up more body space (the Xiaomi 10 Ultra dual speakers are squeezed into asymmetry due to the ultra long focal power).
From the actual effect, the ultra long focus of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is really strong, and only Huawei PPP (P40 Pro+) can compete with it. The next echelon is the Vivo X50 Pro+'s true 5x light change, and then the Xiaomi 10 Pro with the actual 3.7x light change. The results are basically directly related to the optical magnification, and the difference between different algorithms is still difficult to make up for the gap between optical zoom.
Multi shot consistency and high pixel mode
Xiaomi 10 Ultra, 4-shot consistency comparison
Xiaomi 10 Ultra, 4-shot consistency comparison
Xiaomi 10 Ultra, 4-shot consistency contrast, central magnification
Xiaomi 10 Ultra, high pixel mode contrast, Scene 2. In addition to 4800W pixel mode, Xiaomi 10 Ultra also provides an "AI 100 million pixel" mode
High pixel mode, 4-machine contrast, scene 1, central magnification
High pixel mode, 4-machine contrast, scene 2, central magnification
In terms of multi camera consistency, Xiaomi's two machines both perform moderately (especially the white balance of the ultra long focus will be different to some extent)
Main photography daytime contrast
Scene 2, main camera contrast
Scene 2, main camera contrast, central magnification
Light Scene 1
Light scene 1, central zoom in
Light scene 2, zoomed in above the center
Light scene 2, central zoom in
Light Scene 4
Light scene 4, central zoom in
Weak light scene 1
Weak light scene 1, zoom in below the center
Weak light scene 1, central amplification
Weak light scene 2
Weak light scene 2, zoom in on the right side of the center
Weak light scene 2, zoom in at the bottom right of the center
Weak light scene 3
Weak light scene 3, zoom in on the left side of the center
Weak light scene 4
Weak light scene 5
Extremely weak light scene 1
Extremely weak light scene 1, central amplification (Xiaomi 10 Ultra in this scene, six consecutive samples have the bug of noise explosion, but the analytical power is very strong)
Extremely weak light scene 2
Extremely weak light scene 2, central amplification (both are in automatic mode, but the multi frame synthesis excited by one plus 8 Pro is stronger)
Extremely weak light scene 2, zoom in below the center
In terms of subjective discrimination, Xiaomi 10 Pro won without suspense. No matter which mode is more suitable for "counting hair", but in front of several large pixel models, the weak light scene will be inverted (the contrast and noise will be strained). The rest are all at 12 million pixel level, which are not obvious. The main reason is that the sharpening and contrast of One Plus 8 Pro are both increased, and the "at first glance" proof is clearer, but the details of the picture are not natural and a bit "dry".
In terms of white balance, the Xiaomi 10 Ultra is the most accurate one in most cases. In some scenes, Yijia and Vivo tend to turn green and red, while the Xiaomi 10 Pro is really floating. In terms of light measurement, Xiaomi 10 Ultra will have significantly higher picture brightness in low light scenes, brighter and richer dark details, and extremely low light scenes are more likely to become night vision devices. In most cases, the metering of vivo is the closest to the actual situation.
Camera Summary
The Xiaomi 10 Ultra has few slots, except for its slow imaging speed and focusing pull bellows. It has the best white balance in millet's history. Once triggered successfully, it has no tolerance of the opponent and exaggerated night vision effect. While the Xiaomi 10 Pro is "in the wrong direction", as long as it is not in extremely low light scenes, its discrimination is obviously one gear higher than that of the mainstream flagship (but it is also one of the flagship models with the most serious poor close range vision and blurry highlight edges).
It is their "sub camera group" that allows several machines to open a distance. At the same time, it also proves to us once again that IMX586 (the ultra wide angle of Yijia, the super telephoto of 10 meters) and S5K2L7 (two sets of 2 times telephoto of 10 meters) are good CMOS.
On the ultra wide angle side, 1200W pixels are spread out into the ultra wide angle, and the details are not enough to see. As a result, the IMX586 ultra wide angle of one plus 8 Pro can not open a big gap in most scenes. However, after the weak light scene or the 4800W mode is manually turned on, it is still easy to hang other products. The high pixel large wide-angle scheme of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is not as discriminating as Xiaomi 10 Pro, but the wide angle scheme is so successful that it can show such details and weak light (Xiaomi's ancestral super wide-angle position makes it easy for fingers to be seen in the camera).
Long focus, as mentioned above. Two Xiaomi's 2x telephoto (S5K2L7) both performed well. Without dual core focusing 1.4 μ m level CMOS, the 2x telephoto can not be added, increasing the power consumption and cost (after all, the main digital cutting can also have close, even better details).
For the ultra long focus, the IMX586 also brings very obvious advantages to Xiaomi 10 Ultra. Although the aperture is very small, it can also be triggered when the light is weak. It can easily win the X50 Pro+'s true 5 times light change all day long. Except the super long focus of Huawei P40 Pro+, other models can't play at all. However, the application area of 5x ultra long focus is really too narrow. Not to mention mobile phones, cameras rarely use a focal length as high as 5 times.
Endurance&Charging
Xiaomi 10 Ultra is equipped with 4500mAh battery. After 30 minutes of gaming (NBA 2K15), 30 minutes of wifi and 4/5G surfing, and 30 minutes of local video playback, a total of 2 hours of endurance testing, the remaining power in 120Hz mode is 79%, and the remaining power in 60Hz mode is 85%. Like other 120Hz models, high brush mainly affects the game part, and has little impact on the Internet and watching videos.
However, the 120Hz MIUI 12, superimposed with dual core discharge loss, has a weaker endurance than the Xiaomi 10 Pro, which is far worse than the Xiaomi 10 Pro running MIUI 11 half a year ago.
Xiaomi 10 Ultra is a graphene based battery (not a 6C battery cell), which mainly enhances the heat dissipation capacity and cycle times.
The measured 100 watt duration was about 10 seconds, followed by 87W and 80W for 1 minute, 70W for 4 minutes, 45W for 7 minutes, and then the curve dropped to 13W in 7 minutes. The 23 shunt clock power showed 100%, but there was still 13W input, and then gradually decreased to 4.6W (it took 8 minutes to trickle, and the voltage was about 10V), and it was fully charged in 31 minutes. Even if it is "sneaking", the power is still "0.5 Lu" faster than Apple's five blessings and one security.
At the room temperature of 27 ℃ (the iQOO 5 Pro test temperature is 26 ℃, and the temperature on both sides cannot be directly compared), the highest temperature of the Xiaomi 10 Ultra fuselage appeared in 14 minutes, 42.2 ℃, and then slowly decreased. The highest temperature of the charging head is 49.2 ℃ in about 20 minutes. Xiaomi's fuselage is slightly hot, and the charging hair is not too hot; IQOO transfers the heat to the charging head. The body temperature is better controlled, but the charging head is significantly hotter.
Charging curve comparison
Charging time node
The iQOO 5 Pro maintains more power (100 watts at the 3-minute level), and there is no common trickle down process. The battery capacity is 500 mAh less, which will definitely be faster than Xiaomi. Xiaomi 10 Ultra is a compromise. It can reduce the speed of capacity change and "sneak trickle charging". The battery is more "healthy", but still far faster than non 120W mobile phones, especially in the most emergency low power area.
HotGusy hot male wireless charging speed test
Compared with the 120W of iQOO, the biggest advantage of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is the 55W wireless fast charge and its compatibility. The comprehensive charging experience is unparalleled:
Xiaomi 10 Ultra's 55W vertical air-cooled wireless charging is the fastest wireless charging at present, supporting Qi and EPP protocols. Because the charging washer is squeezed down by the ultra long focal lens, a "heightening pad" must be added to both 55W wireless charging and the previous 30W wireless charging. Although the wireless charging is 55W, the actual body is 50W (OTA space in legend), and the charging speed is the same as the wired charging speed of Xiaomi 10 Pro, but there is almost no trickle down process. It takes only 43 minutes to fully charge (50 minutes for Xiaomi 10 Pro), which is faster than the wired charging of most mobile phones. The 199 yuan cost is still worth (but it can only be 50W with several 65W or 120W fast charging heads of Xiaomi home).
The Xiaomi 10 Ultra is compatible with third-party PPS, Beisi, Xibo, and even Samsung's TA845 can run more than 40W. Even if it is only QC 3.0, it can run 24W. Xiaomi's own GaN quick charger also has 55W, and the price is not high. If you have more quick chargers at home/office, your life will be very happy.
Xiaomi also has a 100W car charger of 99 yuan, 1C1A, dual port 68W output. The air conditioner in the car should be turned on quickly. It can be fully charged in 25 minutes. The car is full of blood before entering the parking lot.
Regrets of domestic flagship
The regret of Xiaomi 10 Ultra is more a microcosm of the domestic flagship. In my opinion, regrets rank from high to low: 2K screen>weight>waterproof>USB 3. X
The 6.67 inch 1080P+A screen has only 386ppi, and the Pentile array has only 315ppi after discount, which is really impressive (the millet 2 eight years ago was 342ppi...). In the past 10 years, it has been Pentile discount, low-frequency PWM, duster cloth, and Zhou Dongyu. The world of A screen is terrible (LCD is never slave!!!!!!!!!!!);
The weight and width of 221.8g is better than that of the iPhone 11 Pro Max 512GB Dark Night Green National Travel's first full version with AppleCare+non Hainan duty-free version, but when will the Android flagship become smaller and heavier than the iPhone?
The perception of waterproof and USB 3. X is relatively weak. This year, most flagship ships have the ability to prevent splashing. What's more, the author, Apple Samsung, has not soaked in water for so many years. USB 3. X is mainly used for backup and movie navigation, but if the previous/next mobile phone supports WiFi 6, the speed of the replacement assistant is 120M/s, which makes you lazy to open the computer. However, as the flagship, we can not use these, but these emergency capabilities cannot be absent (need to add money).
summary
In the evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S7 edge in 2016, we like to write that "the real flagship will make people forget about SoC, and may even lose points because of SoC". Unexpectedly, four years later, Samsung fell behind when the domestic flagship reached this level.
In the past two years, people have paid less attention to SoC. One reason is that Exynos and Kirin have become weaker. The world is a dragon 865/865+, so there is no choice; On the other hand, the domestic flagship has become more and more powerful in taking photos, charging and other peripheral configurations, diluting the attention.
In the second half of 2020, if you ask me, "What kind of mobile phone should I buy at a price of more than 5000 yuan?". I will jump out without hesitation: Xiaomi 10 Ultra iQOO 5 Pro、 One plus 8 Pro vivo X50 Pro+、Find X2、 Glory 30 Pro. Xiaomi is still the most cost-effective one. Even though the ppi is not enough and is overweight, it still costs 5299 yuan to make friends when you touch the ceiling when taking photos and charging. What's the best bike?
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
