Meizu PRO 6 Plus and Glory V9 are close to the price, the former ISP+optical anti shake IMX386 with Exynos 8890, yes Meizu has the strongest camera hardware in history, while Glory V9 is not equipped with the new dual camera on Mate9, but has Kirin 960's ISP and new algorithm. Whose photo is stronger, and how much? Let's see:
Since Note5 is my daily use machine, it appears as a reference for white balance and photometry. The other three machines are all 1.25 per pixel μ The sensor with the highest hardware quality is the optical anti shake 386 on the PRO 6 Plus. Huawei P9 and Glory V9 have no phase focusing and optical anti shake, and the hardware parameters are not beautiful. Up to now, Glory V9 has not been able to confirm the specific model of the main camera.
1.25 commonly seen in the market μ There are four 12 million pixel sensors of m unit pixel: IMX286/386/486 and OV12870. The latter two are known after communication with some technicians, and cannot be determined 100%. You can refer to:
IMX286 has been used by Huawei since P9; Meizu's IMX386 in use also supports phase focusing;
The IMX486 used by some low-end models of Huawei is the 286 of the cost control version. It also has no phase focus, and its quality is slightly poor;
OV12870 appears on some models of Huawei and other manufacturers, and the hardware part is 13 million pixels 1.25 μ The OV13870 of m is limited to 12 million because the full pixel output has a dark edge.
Wide angle and discrimination
The number of vertical pixels of the 16 megapixel Note5 is similar to that of the other three 12 megapixel models 4: 3's Directly extend both sides on 12 million pixels. In wide angle range/focal length, Note5 is a common 28mm equivalent focal length. The wide angle range of the other three machines is very close, about 27mm.
The proof sheet is magnified proportionally to compare the size of the same scene
The equivalent focal length of the lens of Note5 is larger (smaller in wide angle), and the frame proportion is longer. The number of pixels of the same scene in its sample is far more than that of the other three machines. The same poster is a whole circle larger in the Note5 sample. Even if other conditions are consistent, its advantages in discrimination will be greater. The longer focus lens will also have a better "side effect" of virtualization, at the cost of small wide-angle and limited shooting.
Strong light/sunlight scene
Daytime Scenario 1
Daytime scene 1 central zoom in
Daytime scene 2 central zoom in
Daytime scenario 3
Daytime scene 3 central zoom in
Light scene
Light Scene 1
Light Scene 1 Center Enlarged
Light Scene 2
Light Scene 2 Center Enlarged
Light Scene 3
Light Scene 3 Center Enlarged
Low light scene
Weak light scene 1
Weak light scene 1 central amplification
Weak light scene 2 central amplification
Weak light scene 3
Weak light scene 3 central amplification
Extremely weak light scene
Extremely weak light scene 1 central amplification
Extremely weak light scene 2
Extremely weak light scene 2 central amplification
Extremely weak light scene 3
Extremely weak light scene 3 Central amplification
Summary
Note 5： Its performance is probably familiar to everyone. Its photometric accuracy is extremely high, and it is a real realistic photometric system; The tinting is slightly more colorful, which is a type of pleasing to the eye. The white balance is more accurate in most occasions, except for the lighting and weak light scenes, which are warm and infrared. The 16 million pixel camera with optical anti shake and excellent noise reduction algorithm can also maintain strong discrimination in weak light/extremely weak light, Its comprehensive strength is still at the top level even today. Its photo taking experience is still better than the several machines compared this time, with fast shutter response The film rate is higher, and the advantage of focusing success rate is more obvious. The main problem is that the anti glare ability of the lens is average, The contrast is low in extremely weak light.
Huawei P9: During the evaluation last year, P9's photos performed fairly well in China, but today they are more difficult. No phase focusing, normal focusing speed is slow, light After weakening, not only the fan box will be pulled, but also the film forming rate and focusing success rate will be significantly reduced, and the other three machines will leave a distance behind. The absolute discrimination is slightly higher than that of Glory V9 in the light environment with good daylight and light. However, the metering is uniformly dark, and the problem of insufficient exposure under weak light will become more serious. Noise control, discrimination and color saturation are all abandoned by V9.
Glory V9: Although the camera hardware is very similar to P9, the ISP and algorithm are dominant, and they surpass P9 in almost all aspects except the ultimate discrimination. When focusing, it will still pull the bellows, but the overall focusing speed is slightly faster, and the success rate of weak light focusing is much higher than P9. The color and contrast of the default mode are similar to those of Huawei P9, both of which are slightly more colorful and high contrast, but there is no obvious underexposure problem like P9.
Its main improvement is weak light imaging. Even though ISO and shutter are consistent with P9, the noise reduction smear algorithm can retain more picture details and sharpness. The worse the light, the more obvious the gap. In extremely weak light, it even takes photos with exposure close to that of night vision device S7, and the color saturation is comparable to Pixel's HDR+. Of course, there will be nothing in this case The details can be explained. For machines that do not have optical anti shake, but also use the previous generation of sensors, it is commendable to be able to do so.
PRO 6 Plus： The focusing speed and success rate are good, The photo experience has improved, but it is not as good as the same level models of Huawei and Xiaomi. With optical anti shake, the weak light film rate is slightly better than V9, but it is only the normal level of domestic flagship, Manual instability will have a greater impact on the film 。 The daytime and weak light discrimination are better than P9 and V9. With the addition of optical anti shake, the worse the light, the more ahead of V9. Its image details and noise smudging algorithm are similar to those of Samsung copy (in fact, Samsung is involved), The noise control and details are good, not like Meizu in everyone's impression. The biggest problem is that the metering is not accurate and the possibility of overexposure is high.
More proofs
Daytime scenario 4
Daytime scene 4 central zoom in
Daytime scene 5 central zoom in
Light Scene 4
Light Scene 4 Center Enlarged
Light Scene 5
Light Scene 5 Zoom in above the center
Light Scene 5 Center Enlarged
Light Scene 6
Light Scene 6 Center Enlarged
Light Scene 7
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
