1: Preamble
As Meizu 2016 Flagship of the year ， PRO 6s It can be said that it has come out after a thousand calls, but just like the end of the western tour, fans guessed the beginning correctly, but the end was wrong. The popular Exynos 8890 did not appear, and the HiFi module at the stacking level did not return. PRO 6s did not bring about any earth shaking changes compared with PRO 6. Is PRO 6s really so boring?
2: Appearance introduction
In terms of packaging, PRO 6s is almost the same as PRO 6. It is also a black square box, made of plastic material, with the LOGO of PRO 6s printed on the front. It has a one-time seal up and down, and the overall force is very high.
After opening the packing box, you can see that the PRO 6s and accessories are all lying inside. To be honest, I really like this particular layout.
For the family portrait, PRO 6s are equipped with a Type-C data cable, a 24W fast charging head, pins and San Bao vouchers as standard.
The PRO 6s is covered with a protective film on the front and back of the body, which can effectively prevent the mobile phone from damaging the screen during transportation.
The front of PRO 6s uses a 2.5D glass. Although the design in 2016 is more or less aesthetic fatigue, there is no denying that PRO 6s is still a "beauty responsibility".
From left to right, there are front facing cameras, earphones and sensors on the top of the PRO 6s. Thanks to the black panel, the opening does not give a sudden feeling.
There is only one Home key at the bottom of the front, and the fingerprint unlocking module is integrated. There is no obvious color difference between the Home key and the front panel.
There is only one secondary MIC opening at the top of the fuselage, and 3.5mm headphone interface, MIC, Type-C interface and speaker are arranged from left to right at the bottom. The openings are all on the same horizontal line, so Virgos don't need to tangle.
There are power keys and volume keys on the left side of the fuselage, and sim card slot on the right side. The dual card design cannot expand the TF card.
The back of the PRO 6s is the same as that of the PRO 6. The main features of the PRO 6s are the one size fits all antenna partition strips and ring flash lamps.
From top to bottom, the top of the back is the main camera, the ring flash and Meizu LOGO. The camera has a slight bulge, but within the acceptable range, the periphery of the camera and the flash has been treated with bright edges, which can not only protect the camera, but also make the vision more unified.
Compared with PRO 6, the back of the PRO 6s has an additional S print to help users distinguish between the two. The integration of the starry sky black color matching with the one size fits all antenna partition strip is good.
3: System Introduction
On the system side, PRO 6s still uses the deeply customized Flyme5 system based on Android 6.0, with little overall change and maintaining the tradition of small and beautiful.
Flyme5 can perform most operations through one hand sliding and clicking, which is also the place where Flyme5 has always been praised. On this basis, the PRO 6s also adds 3D Press, that is, pressure touch. Users can press and call hotkeys to reduce the level of operation, which is generally good. In addition to system applications, WeChat and Weibo also support 3D Press, which will be a strong selling point if it can solve the problem of application popularity. In addition, it should be noted that the 3D Press on PRO 6s gives users perception through vibration feedback, but in terms of the current experience, it is still far from the iPhone. I hope Meizu can improve in this regard in the future.
Flyme5 also provides users with powerful permission management functions for domestic application environments. Users can set according to their own conditions to ensure the rational use of system resources.
4: Hardware performance
In terms of hardware, PRO 6s is still equipped with a Helio X25 processor of MediaTek, two 2.5GHz A72 cores, four 2.0GHz A53 cores and four 1.4GHz A53 cores, supplemented by 4GB RAM+64GB ROM. Helio X25 is really good in terms of specifications. Unfortunately, the 20nm process restricts its performance. In the process of computing, the two A72 cores are often offline Love to play computer games Of Running points library You can also see how powerless Helio X25 is among the flagship aircrafts. As a former kerosene, I also like Meizu to get rid of this helpless state as soon as possible.
The GPU is Mali-T880 MP4, with a frequency of 850MHz. The performance is also very poor due to the small number of cores and frequency reduction. In the sub base, we can only entertain ourselves with our brothers.
5: Photo experience
Meizu 's mobile phone has always been criticized by many players in terms of taking photos. Although it has always been eye-catching in terms of lens parameters, the sample effect taken can not withstand scrutiny, and when everyone has no hope for Meizu, PRO 6s When we came here, the new Sony IMX386 CMOS plus four axis optical anti shake combination seemed to give hope to life all of a sudden. Can the PRO 6s speak for itself with the new lens module?
Photo experience
In terms of viewfinder frame, PRO 6s has maintained its previous simple design, but unfortunately, it is still a bit anti human to operate in the way of click. Most custom systems now use sliding instead of most click operations, which can improve the operating experience, and second, users can focus more on shooting without being distracted by operations. The second thing worth complaining about is the unreasonable layout. For example, the manual mode and HDR mode with high density are placed at the second level. If users want to use them, they must click back and forth to switch, which is really confusing. Finally, there is light metering. The PRO 6s can separate light metering and focusing when taking photos, which is intended to be good, but compared with the direct sliding exposure adjustment method currently used by mainstream mobile phones, it is cumbersome and not intuitive.
After talking about the disadvantages, let's talk about the advantages. The imaging speed of PRO 6s is greatly improved compared with PRO 6, especially in weak light. Although there is still a waiting time, it is already within the acceptable range. In addition, thanks to the addition of optical anti shake, the film rate of PRO 6s has been greatly improved. These two improvements have greatly improved the overall photo taking experience of PRO 6s. It can also be seen that Meizu has made great efforts in taking photos. Although there are still shortcomings in operation, they do not cover up the shortcomings. It is not easy to have such an improvement in image experience.
Sample comparison
From the official publicity, we can see that they are very confident in the imaging of the PRO 6s. The PRO 6s use Sony's latest IMX386 CMOS, with 12 million pixels, F/2.0 aperture, and 6P lenses. It supports phase focusing and optical anti shake, which is very powerful in terms of specifications. It is worth praising for abandoning the pursuit of high pixels. In view of the specifications of PRO 6s in this test, we also selected several popular mobile phone models to participate in the comparison, which are the previous generation flagship PRO 6, Xiaomi 5s and One Plus 3 of Meizu. To ensure fairness, all samples are based on automatic focusing and automatic metering, and HDR is closed. The sequence of the samples is: top left: PRO 6s, top right: PRO 6, bottom left: millet 5s, bottom right: one plus three.
Daytime proof sheet:
Comparison 1:
The white balance of PRO 6s in comparison sample 1 is the closest to that seen by the naked eye, while millet 5s is blue. After zooming in, we can see that the processing of one plus three pairs of details is more excellent.
Comparison II:
Compared with the second sample, we can see that the tolerance of one plus three is the best. The details of the nearby leaves are still clear. After zooming in, one plus three continues to lead the way. The details of building boards and leaves are well preserved, while the other three have lost the details of leaves to varying degrees.
Comparison 3:
The PRO 6 in the third comparison sample did not leave the opponent in detail because of the large pixels. After zooming in, we can see that the word "Yongmao" is basically equivalent to the 1200W pixels such as PRO 6s and Xiaomi 5s. On the contrary, the details of one plus three are obviously better than the other three, and the font is sharp and clear, which is worthy of praise.
Comparison 4:
The performance of the four mobile phones in the fourth comparison sample is very good. On the whole, one plus three retains the most details in the near and far, and the image is the cleanest after zooming in.
Comparison 5:
Comparison 6:
In the comparison sample sheet 6, it can be seen that one plus three pairs of wood are restored to the best position, the gaps between the wood are clear, and the appearance is also the best, while the other three have smearing marks, which gives a greasy feeling.
Macro contrast:
Comparison 1:
The white balance of PRO 6s in the comparison sample is the most accurate. When you zoom in, you can see that the details of stamens photographed by one plus three are the best, followed by PRO 6/6s.
Comparison II:
In the comparison sample sheet 2, PRO 6 is the best. Both the details of flowers and the veins of green leaves are very good, followed by Xiaomi 5s and PRO 6S, and one plus three is inferior.
Comparison 3:
Tolerance comparison:
Comparison 1 (HDR is enabled for this group of samples):
The first comparison sample is mainly to test the HDR effect of four mobile phones. In the high contrast scene, everyone performs well on the whole. The outline and details of the building can be displayed. After enlarging the sample, it can be seen that the details of the trees in the sample taken by one plus three are the best, and the other three have lost details to varying degrees
Comparison II:
Compared with the PRO 6 in the second sample, the performance of PRO 6 is obviously better than that of the other three. Both the words on the nearby stone surface and the details of the stairs in the distance have been restored very well. It should be noted that HDR has been turned off for all four mobile phones in this group of samples, which is worth praising.
Comparison 3:
The performance of the four mobile phones in the third comparison sample is good, but the details of one plus three after zooming in are still better than the other three.
Night sample:
Sample sheet 1:
Through the comparison of the samples, it can be seen that PRO 6s does not boast this time. The overall brightness is better than the other three. The details are also kept very well after zooming in, and the purity is also controlled very well. The only thing that can complain is that the overall color is red, and once added three times, the details are good. Unfortunately, the noise is obvious. Xiaomi 5s needs to complain about it, After the author has focused on this scene for many times, it is impossible to focus on it, whether it is auto focusing or manual focusing. After research, it is found that Xiaomi 5s can easily fail to focus on it in weak light if the focus is the light source. I hope Xiaomi officials can solve this problem through firmware upgrade as soon as possible.
Sample sheet 2:
The PRO 6s in the second comparison sample continued to lead in brightness. When zooming in to see details, the purity of PRO 6s was the best, followed by Xiaomi 5s. The purity was good, but the brightness was slightly low. When adding 3 and PRO 6, the noise was more obvious, affecting the appearance.
Sample sheet 3:
Three in one and three in the contrast sample achieve the counter attack. The sample picture is very clean, the overall color returns to reality, and the details are rich after magnification, followed by PRO 6s.
Sample 4:
The fourth comparison sample is mainly to check the glare control of the four mobile phones. It can be seen from the comparison that PRO 6s has the best glare control, the picture brightness is high, and the building details in the background are kept in place. Xiaomi 5s and one plus three have obvious light spots, and Xiaomi 5s has obvious smearing marks.
Sample sheet 5:
Sample sheet 6:
The PRO 6s one plus 3 in the comparison sample sheet 6 showed the best performance, not only the main body was clear, but also the details on the ceiling were restored well. In contrast, the Xiaomi 5s had been integrated into one piece. After zooming in the details, the PRO 6s and one plus 3 pairs of signboard fonts and boards were restored very well. The PRO 6s had higher purity, but slightly lower sharpness, while the one plus 3 fonts were more three-dimensional, but the noise was relatively obvious, Xiaomi 5s has a big gap from the former, not only the main body is empty, but also has many noise points.
Sample sheet 7:
After a round of comparison, we believe that the photo performance of PRO 6s is obvious to all. Compared with our own PRO 6, it has made a qualitative leap. It is at the same level with one plus three and Xiaomi 5s when the light is sufficient in the daytime. In the weak light at night, PRO 6s is even more surprising. With the addition of a new lens module and optical anti shake, the exposure time is longer and the ISO is lower, In return, the brightness and purity of the PRO 6s were improved. From the comparison of the samples, it can be found that although the PRO 6s could not be said to leave the opponent in the weak light, most of the scenes were better than the opponent in the weak light, and the hat that has been criticized by the players for its camera residue could finally be taken off.
6: Charging and endurance
Meizu PR0 6s is equipped with a 3060mAh battery, which can only be said to be a standard lineup at present. After passing the 3-hour endurance test of Iooki, 64% of the remaining power is available. It is not a problem to use the battery for one day if it is used moderately or lightly, but it is estimated that the battery can not be charged twice a day if it is used heavily.
In terms of charging, Meizu is equipped with a standard 24W fast charging head. It takes 98 minutes to charge 78% of the battery in an hour through actual measurement of 0% to 100% of the power. In terms of charging speed, Meizu still maintains its consistent brutal style, and users need not worry.
7: Summary
As an annual flagship, Meizu PRO 6s maintains the appearance and most of the hardware of PRO 6, which is really the first time in the domestic mobile phone market like the Warring States Period. There is no denying that PRO The appearance of PRO 6 is unique in terms of design, materials and feel It is understandable that the 6s will continue to be used, but it will take time to test whether Meizu can hand over a brilliant mobile phone like Apple from generation to generation. In terms of photography, the PRO 6s really proved their practical strength. Sony IMX386 CMOS and four axis optical anti shake make the PRO 6s perform well both in the daytime and in low light. It can't be said that it is awesome, but it has finally caught up with the pace of the first echelon. Apart from the relatively poor performance, the PRO 6s has little to complain about, Therefore, the author will recommend some medium and light users to use it. After all, the appearance of PRO 6s is here. But if you are a heavy user who likes to play games on your mobile phone, please try it out before making a decision.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
