Meizu released Meilan U20 and U10 on August 24, which is the only Meizu mobile phone without a press conference in recent years. Maybe it is because Meizu has equipped it with double 2.5D glass and marked the starting price of 1099 and 999 below the main attack line. And we Love to play computer games It is also the first time to get a new machine. Before the evaluation is completed, it is customary to check the appearance and feel of the new machine, and make a simple appearance comparison with similar competitors.

packing

This year, Xiaomi Meizu has streamlined the packaging, and Meilan U20 only has the product name printed on the packaging. This time, we got a white media tester. There are still four major accessories: manual warranty, card pin, charger and power cord. Unfortunately, the Meilan U20 does not support fast charging as the Meilan E released earlier, and the output of the charging head is only 5V2A.

appearance

The factory film of the machine has very, very detailed descriptions of functions and components, which is still done very carefully.

There is no logo, 2.5D glass, concave home key supporting fingerprint identification, and a large degree of edge transition on the front. The combined results of these elements are very close. This year, Meizu's own products and the same generation of products like vivo X7 and OPPO R7 have a very high face blindness rate.

Unfortunately, the 2.5D glass edge radian of the Magenta U20 is not large, and the plastic washer is high (but the screen is still slightly higher than the washer), which causes the edge to slip and scratch slightly.

The 2.5D glass on the back is the biggest feature of the Meilan U20. The glass on the back is slightly more prominent than the glass on the front (I don't know whether it is the tolerance or the original design idea), resulting in a slightly better feel on the edge of the back than on the front.

The layout is similar to that of iPhone 4. The middle and bottom are the classic dialogue of the hot silver logo and "Designed by XX". The camera is slightly prominent and the flash is not hidden under the glass, but has additional holes.

There is a noise reducing microphone on the top of the fuselage, and a headphone interface, a main microphone, a mirco USB interface, and a speaker on the bottom. It is worth noting that there are two antenna partition strips at the top and bottom respectively. One of them is integrated with the headphone interface, but they do not use injection molding technology. Instead, they are plastic strips with lower cost, which will have obvious bulges to the touch. Perhaps to reduce the tolerance requirements, there is also a ring of plastic around the mirco USB interface.

The metal frame has fine sand blasting treatment of small particle size, and the upper and lower joints have bright chamfers. The key layout is the common left card slot+right volume and power buttons. The machine adopts an AND or card slot and supports dual nano SIM cards or SIM cards+TF cards.

Workmanship and feel

Workmanship: The overall workmanship is fairly good, but the antenna has no injection molding process, and the plastic washer is slightly higher. The SIM card slot is relatively tight, and the Home button feels normal when pressed, without a loud sound. The volume and power button feel slightly hard and crisp. However, we don't know whether it is an individual case or a common problem. The volume of our testing machine and the height of the power key are different from each other. The power key is a bit collapsed and loose. Fortunately, for Meizu series, the Home key is the common key.

feel: For the 5.5 inch screen, the frame is narrower than that of the Magic Blue E and the Magic Blue Note3, but the iPhone 4 has the same straight frame and hard transition, which is really a bit awkward. In addition to the warm touch of the glass back cover There is no doubt that Meizu has held the worst mobile phone in history.

Multi computer comparison

Magic Blue Note3, Magic Blue U20, Magic Blue E

Magic Blue Note3, Magic Blue U20, Magic Blue E

The front is almost the same, except for the different positions and slightly different widths of the camera of Melanie E. The thickness is not different, but the back is totally different from the three designs. Although everyone says they are tired of seeing the traditional family face of Meizu, the author prefers the earliest version. In addition, the Meilan U20 is also the only Meilan highlighted by the camera.

Meilan E, Meilan U20, Hongmi Pro

Meilan E, Meilan U20, Hongmi Pro

In the face of material differences, Red Rice Pro and Magic Blue E are more like brothers. The style of Magic Blue U20 is completely different, but the glass material is also very textured.

Note 3, E, U20

The Meizu U20 has the best black edge control among these Meizu phones. The overall border thickness is also smaller, but the screen brightness is not as bright as the two predecessors.

Without the light, the white under the glass will look very plastic, but it is still white in place.

Photo comparison and detailed evaluation will be completed in the near future, please wait