A year ago, the metal fuselage was still the exclusive code name of the high-end flagship, but when it entered 2016, it has fully entered the low-end machine market. We have to admit that science and technology are developing at an extremely rapid speed, and the processing and manufacturing costs of metal body can rapidly decline after a large number of mobile phones are shipped. Therefore, when Meilan 3s came out with metallic color, the industry was no longer surprised by such a configuration. However, no matter how, when the quality of metal is combined with low-end computers, ordinary consumers are quite satisfied, and Meilan 3S is no exception.

This evaluation machine comes from Lei Feng's online trial (the logo sticker for Lei Feng's online trial is much smaller and fresher after it is revised). In terms of packaging, the Magic Blue 3s is simple and simple, but the s character is somewhat like the s behind the iPhone 6s series. Blue is still the main color of the blue factory. The slogan of "Young Good Product" is becoming more and more loud. There are more and more Meilan series models, and users have more choices.

If you just put Meilan 3s on the desktop, in fact, it is difficult to distinguish which model it is on the front, because Meizu's design is too common. It can be said that all Meizu's models have a mark from the same mold. When all mobile phones become a shape, will aesthetics be tired? Are users confused? Can't you pretend happily? Therefore, there is a basis for Apple to specifically mark S on the back shell when upgrading the S version.

In fact, the Meilan 3s is closer to the previous generation flagship Meizu Pro5 to some extent, so this article will directly introduce the Meilan 3s and Meizu Pro5 in a frontal collision. In fact, if viewed from a distance, the gap between the two is almost just different in size.

The shape of Meilan 3s is 141.9mmX69.9mmX8.3mm, and that of Meizu Pro5 is 156.7mmX78mmX7.5mm. The difference between the two is not small, and there is also some difference in thickness. However, the 0.8mm difference in thickness does have a big difference in hand feel. Because of its small size and slightly larger thickness, Meilan 3s will have a more solid grip without a very thin feeling.

For the design of the top of the front, Meilan 3s adopts a symmetrical design. Obviously, because of the asymmetric design of Meizu Pro5, it will look better in terms of sense, but the design of big and small eyes will still make people feel uncomfortable.

The HOME key of Meizu series doesn't seem to make much difference. Except that Meizu 3, the most basic series, is not equipped with a fingerprint identification sensor, other series have been equipped with fingerprint identification. Moreover, Meizu's HOME key is a relatively successful design at present. Tap it to return, and then press it again to return to the desktop. It is very comfortable to operate.

The three-stage design on the back of Meilan 3s and Meizu Pro5 are basically the same model. In the design of the whole rear shell, the difference between Meilan 3s and Meizu Pro5 is only the shape of the flash lamp, because Meizu Pro5 has a laser assisted focusing instrument at the flash lamp.

In terms of key design, Meilan 3s and Meizu Pro5 both adopt the more mature design scheme in the market, that is, the volume increase/decrease button and the power button are placed on the right side of the body. The only difference is that Meizu Pro5 has opened a groove at the three keys. In actual operation, the three buttons of Meilan 3s have moderate travel and strong rebound.

The SIM card slot of Meilan 3s is the same as Meizu Pro5, which is located on the left side of the body. It is worth mentioning that Meilan 3s is also a full Netcom phone. After the slight pain of telecom phones, all new mobile phones released by Meizu this year support the full Netcom system.

There is only 3.5mm headphone hole on the top of Meilan 3s. Compared with Meizu Pro5, there is one less noise reducing microphone. For the entry model, it is understandable to reduce the configuration slightly.

In terms of bottom design, the Meilan 3s also adopts symmetrical design, which looks beautiful and is obviously superior to the design of Meizu Pro5. However, the entry-level model is not equipped with Type-C interface, and Meilan 3s still use the microUSB interface design.

The display resolution of Meilan 3s is only 720P, the pixel density is 296PPI, and the brightness is 380cd/m ². It can be seen that this is not a high-quality screen. In actual use, this screen performs generally, its color is relatively accurate, its visual angle is also OK, its brightness is average, and its performance under strong light is OK.

As an entry-level model, the screen is not bad enough to reach this level. After all, the price has basically determined the performance of the phone, but this screen can still meet the needs of daily use.

The main camera of Meilan 3s has 13 million pixels, supports PDAF phase focusing, and is equipped with flash. When the Duanmu was actually measured, it was compared with the 360 mobile phone N4. See the following photo sample for details.

The above photo samples were taken when HDR was turned on. From the specific performance, the photos taken by Meilan 3s were slightly inferior to those of 360 mobile phone N4. After the Meilan 3s is turned on by HDR, the brightness adjustment details are excessive, and the whole picture is over exposed. In contrast, the 360 mobile phone N4 is slightly better for imaging control. In addition, due to the exaggeration of brightness and contrast, the white balance in the Meilan 3s photo proof is not accurate enough, and the details are not rich enough. Of course, compared with the 360 phone N4 and the 360 phone N4, it is actually a bully. Because the model matching the 360 phone N4 and the Meizu phone should be the Meilan note3, so even if the Meilan 3s loses to the 360 phone N4, it is not a disgrace. However, it should be pointed out that the performance of the Meilan 3s camera is not so satisfactory.

As for Meizu Flyme system, it is unnecessary for familiar users to introduce it. In addition, Duanmu believes that the best thing for the system is what suits him. Habit becomes natural. Fans of other brands will not adapt to it in the early stage if they force transformation. Therefore, this article will skip the introduction of the system.

The hardware configuration of Meilan 3s is not so powerful. The 8-core MTK MT6750 processor, two sets of chips with the dominant frequencies of 1.5GHz and 1.0GHz, ARM Mail T860 graphics processor, 2GB RAM, 16GB ROM, are completely entry-level models. In actual use, Meilan 3s microblogging is not bad, obviously Meizu has targeted some basic applications to do a very good optimization. However, in terms of running large games, Meilan 3s seems to be powerless. After all, the configuration is not enough to support the extremely large games, and the torrent speedboat measured by Duanmu runs smoothly, but NBA2K16 is extremely obvious, and cannot play happily.

In terms of video playback, according to the test of An Rabbit, Meilan 3s supports 24 formats, which is a good result. In the actual experience, Meilan 3s plays videos smoothly, but it will get stuck slightly when dragging quickly, and the overall performance is OK.

The battery capacity of Meilan 3s is 3020mAh, but it does not support fast charging technology, so the whole charging process takes about two hours. For heavy users, this is a very bad result.

In terms of endurance, Duanmu, according to its own usage habits, spends about an hour on microblogging, an hour on playing small games, half an hour on browsing the web, an hour on listening to music, and about 15 minutes on answering and making phone calls every day. From morning to evening, the remaining power is about 45%, which is a good result. Of course, heavy users must recharge every day.

The price of the Meilan 3s is only 699 yuan, so when we first meet, the metal body of the Meilan 3s will brighten our eyes. After all, the appearance of the flagship model is very pleasant. But after in-depth experience, we found that the Meilan 3s can only meet the general needs of daily use. For mobile phone enthusiasts, such a configuration is totally incompetent. Therefore, after all, the entry model is only for users with very little demand, but for these users, the metal body is beautiful enough and fingerprint recognition is good enough!