home page evaluating Article Details
1000 yuan machine duel music 2/Hongmi Note3/Meilan Note3 photo horizontal review
Charles Fang 2017-06-23 23:46

This time, we have brought the three most concerned 1000 yuan machines—— Meilan Note3, Hongmi Note3 and Le2 Take photos and make comments. Their starting prices are 799, 899 and 1099 yuan respectively, but their 3G memory+64G storage versions are 999, 1099 and 1099 yuan (there is only one version of Le 2).

Since the release of the first generation of red rice in mid 2013, the attention and configuration of the 1000 yuan machine have been soaring, and more and more flagship configurations have been released to the 1000 yuan market. From 4-core CPU to 8-core CPU and 10 core CPU, the camera has reached 16 million and almost has standard phase focusing, which gives many users the illusion that the 1000 yuan camera is not much worse than the flagship. But in fact, how much difference will the 1000 yuan camera have between the 1000 yuan camera and the flagship?


Test description

 

Photo experience

All three machines have phase focusing, but none of them has HDR and night view modes that can be automatically triggered. Their extreme focusing speed is slightly slower than that of the flagship, but the gap is not large There is a clear gap between the enthusiasm and speed of pre focusing and the flagship

Their shutter response is very fast, the HDR and night scene processing speed is average, and the speed of Zhongle 2 is slower. The low light flaking rate is low, and The success rate of focusing has declined significantly, especially in the case of Meilan Note3.

Overall, The photo experience of three thousand yuan machines cannot open a big gap In strong light, it is not much worse than the flagship, but the problems of speed and focusing success rate will be highlighted if the light is slightly weaker, and there is still much room for progress (the subtext is really ordinary).


HDR and panoramic mode  

PS: Click the picture to view the large picture

Automatic mode of Meilan Note3 HDR mode of Meilan Note3


Automatic mode of Hongmi Note3 All Netcom HDR mode of Hongmi Note3 All Netcom

Automatic mode of Le 2 HDR mode of Le 2

The HDR of Hongmi Note3 All Netcom and Meilan Note3 will cause the deviation of white balance or metering, and the edge of the object will have "fogging blur", which will affect the discrimination. Among them, the HDR severity of Hongmi is higher than that of Meilan. LeEco is relatively much better. Although there is a certain decrease in contrast, the effect is not obvious.



In terms of panorama mode, if the availability of Xiaomi's HDR is very low, the panorama mode of Hongmi Note3 All Netcom is disabled. I don't know whether it is due to a problem with the development version system or a common problem. The tester can only run at 1/2 of the prompt angle. Once it runs at the full angle, it will flash back, so the rotation angle of the whole piece is only about 150 degrees. The resolution is only about 2200 * 800, the size is about 350KB, and the availability is too low.

 

(The sample has been compressed)

The angle of Le 2 is about 270 degrees, the resolution can reach 10528 * 2416, and the sample size is 6.6MB. The analytical power is the most complete among the three machines. The stitching trace and light dark transition are natural, and the performance is good.


  (The sample has been compressed)

The Meilan Note3 film is close to 360 degrees, with a resolution of 13440 * 2404, but the sample is only 4.29MB. The compression ratio is too large, and the sample has a serious loss of discrimination. However, the stitching trace and light dark transition are well handled.

 


(The sample has been compressed)

The flagship S6 edge has an angle of nearly 400 degrees and a resolution of 19152 * 2816, 17.6MB. Splicing traces, light and shade transition, Heyue 2 and Meilan Note3 can not open the gap, but the advantages of discrimination are very obvious.


Daytime proof sheet

PS: Click the picture to view the large picture

Scenario 1


Scenario 2


Scene 2 central zoom in


Scenario 3


Scene 3 central zoom in


Scene 4 central zoom in


Scenario 5


Scenario 6


Scene 6 central zoom in


Scene 7 Central zoom in


Scene 8 central zoom in


Scene 9 Central zoom in


Indoor proof sheet


Indoor scene 1


Indoor scene 1 central magnification


Indoor scene 2


Indoor scene 2 central magnification


Indoor scene 3


Indoor scene 3 central magnification


Indoor scene 4


Indoor scene 4 central magnification


Weak light proof sheet

Weak light scene 1 central amplification


Weak light scene 2 (pay attention to glare at the light source)


Weak light scene 2 central amplification


Weak light scene 3 (pay attention to glare at the light source)




Weak light scene 3 central amplification


Weak light scene 4


Weak light scene 5 central amplification


Weak light scene 6 central amplification


Weak light scene 7


Low light scene 8


Weak light scene 8 central amplification

The film gap between the three machines is far larger than expected:


Le 2's photometry is slightly brighter than that seen by the naked eye, and its color is light and elegant. The white balance has an obvious yellow tendency. On the contrary to red rice, the image can hardly be sharpened, and even has obvious noise smearing traces. There is no obvious fine noise like red rice, but the analytical power is compromised.

After the light weakens, the performance is the strongest among the three thousand yuan machines, which not only exceeds the red rice Note3 full netcom, but also has a relatively more accurate white balance, normal saturation, slightly dark metering, complete discrimination, and noise control far better than red rice and magic blue. The performance is amazing. The biggest slot is that the anti glare effect of the lens is really ordinary. When encountering a strong light source, there will be a large circle of radioactive light.

However, the flaws do not hide the merits. Le 2 must be the best and most balanced imaging machine among the three thousand yuan machines, and it has been widely abandoned. The software algorithm is obviously more attentive.

 

Meilan Note3 is not a standard at all, and the gap is far greater than the number of pixels. The white balance in the daytime is obviously yellow, the contrast of the picture is low, and the color saturation is also low, just like the color has been bleached and covered with gray. In addition to the smearing algorithm and greater wide-angle, the power of discrimination is thrown away far, far, far.

The white balance under weak light is slightly better than red rice, which is also yellow and red in dark places. The lens quality is above Le 2 and below Red Rice Note 3. The discrimination under normal light is still worrying, but the noise smearing algorithm is far more reasonable than red rice, and the extremely weak light discrimination can even surpass red rice Note3 All Netcom, which is quite unexpected.

Share with friends Share to Weibo
Scan WeChat to share the page with friends
It is recommended to use the built-in sharing function of the current mobile browser
-->
Related articles