The author is curious that in today's booming tablet market, where differentiation and popularity coexist, the thousand yuan level win8 tablet is like an attractive Apple, but many people also have concerns about how to deal with the thousand yuan tablet? Is the performance enough for you? This has puzzled many people. This time, the author brought two thousand yuan tablets to understand the workmanship and performance of the mainstream domestic thousand yuan tablets.

【 It is basically the same as the Onda v102w in configuration, with a large difference in appearance]

Chiwei and Onda are the mainstream manufacturers of tablets in China at present. Their predecessors are mp3 mp4 manufacturers. They have rich experience in digital manufacturing such as tablets. The configurations used by Chiwei Vi10 and Onda v102w are also the mainstream Intel quad core processor Z3736F, 2G running memory, 32GROM. The Chiwei Vi10 has a 10.6-inch screen, while the Onda v102w has a 10.1-inch screen, which is larger than the Vi10 in size.

In appearance, the front and back of Chicheng Vi10 are made of tempered glass, which is somewhat similar to While the Onda v102w is made of plastic. The overall sense of quality should be a little poor. In terms of workmanship, I personally think Chiwei's double mirror surface is more finished, while the plastic material of Onda V102w makes a strange noise in my hand, which makes me very disappointed in the process. Chiwei's Vi10 workmanship is passable, the front and rear glass materials are very neat, and the frame is wrapped in metal like leather. It's good to be a 1000 yuan tablet in terms of workmanship, but there is still a gap between the workmanship and the Microsoft SURFACE I used before, but after all, the prices are far from each other.

[USB interface is very important. Chicheng is VI10 dual USB interface, and Onda v102w has no USB standard interface]

The biggest difference between the two tablets in the interface is that Chiwei VI10 has added a dual USB interface, so that it can connect the mouse and keyboard externally, U disk, mobile hard disk, etc., while the Onda v102w does not have a standard USB2.0 interface, which makes me feel particularly disappointed. As a win8 system, it is very necessary to use a large number of U disks, mouse and keyboard, etc. Although it can be connected to external Bluetooth, there will be a lot of boredom, such as the lack of power for Bluetooth keys and mice, etc, I can only say that Onda's non-standard USB interface design is simply unacceptable.

There are a few 32GROM tablets as WIN8 systems. It is necessary to support expansion. Even if expansion is not possible, external hard disks are better. Fortunately, Chiwei Vi10 and Onda v102w both support tf expansion cards, but they can only be expanded to 64G at most. However, if it is an external USB flash drive, Chiwei is more convenient. Onda v102w also needs to carry an OTG cable to connect an external USB flash drive, which is troublesome.

As can be seen from the figure, Onda V102W is very embarrassed when facing USB devices, while Chiwei V102W can easily connect two USB devices.

[The back material has its own shortcomings. The texture of Onda v102w is poor, and it is a VI10 fingerprint collector]

In terms of material, the back is the place where the hands touch more. In terms of use, the back material of Onda V102W is slightly cheaper, especially with the plastic on the side. It really feels like a cheap tablet in terms of hand feel. Maybe this is to save costs. After all, it is only a tablet of seven or eight hundred pieces. Chiwei VI10 is not bad to be caught. The glass back plate looks more high-end, but look, The black and glass material has obvious fingerprints on the back, which also makes the back of Chiwei VI10 a fingerprint collector.

Perhaps it is related to the capping process mold. There are obvious gaps in the part of Onda v102w, while Chiwei VI10 is wrapped by metal skin. Whether there are gaps in it is unknown, but the appearance surface looks tight. This one is not bad, at least not too cheap.

[The resolution affects the fineness. The resolution of Chicheng VI10 is impressive, and the Onda v102w is more exquisite]

On the screen, Chiwei VI10 uses the same resolution as the generation surface, 1366x768, while Onda v102w uses 1920X1200 resolution. In terms of delicacy, Onda v102w is the best. I personally like 1920X1200 resolution. After all, as a tablet, we use it. The flat screen will be very close to our glasses. If the resolution is too low, it will be easy to see rough edges. If, like a computer monitor, it is far from the glasses, it is OK to have a smaller resolution. In the actual experience, the 1920X1200 screen of Onda v102w is clearer and more exquisite.

[The hardware performance is basically the same, and the low resolution reverse display is more smooth]

Z3736F, 2G running memory can be said to be the configuration adopted by almost all thousand yuan win8 tablets at present. How about the specific performance? The subjective scoring software can only give a rough idea. It can be seen from the scoring that the performance of the two tablets is basically the same, and these two configurations are basically the mainstream configurations at the same price. Almost all domestic WIN8 tablets at the same price use the same configuration, but there are only differences in appearance and other details. In the actual experience, although Chiwei VI10 has a lower resolution, it is more fluent in games and other applications. After all, the performance of the 1000 yuan tablet is not better than that of the 1000 yuan tablet With desktop computers, low resolution is better for performance.

[Positioning online video document editing, league of heroes can play with low quality]

In view of the same performance of the two tablets, and the Chiwei VI10 is more fluent, the Chiwei vi10 is used here for relevant application experience. From the performance screenshot of Master Lu, Chiwei vi10 is a tablet targeting netbooks, but certainly many people want to know whether it is feasible to play cf and Hero League and other people's games. The author also has this question, We tested the League of Heroes with relatively high requirements, that is, LOL. In view of its low performance, we tried it with the lowest picture quality of 1366X768 resolution. Through experience, under the lowest picture quality of 1366X768 resolution, Chiwei VI10 can play LOL with an average frame number of about 40 frames, which is completely competent. But what I want to say is that it is OK to play games occasionally instead of laptops and desktops, But after all, the screen is only 10.6 inches, and its performance is not high. It is not good to use it as a main game console.

It can be seen from the actual use that the importance of the USB port, whether connected to the mouse, keyboard or USB flash disk, is of great significance.

[The dual system is more user-friendly, and the frame is too thick to handle]

Chiwei VI10 is a dual system tablet, which is more user-friendly, and which system you want to use. However, under the Android system, the shortcomings of the relatively large frame of Chiwei VI10 are undoubtedly exposed. As WIN8 system relies more on mouse and keyboard operation, the actual use of handheld operation will not be too much, while the Android system is more handheld operation, the shortcomings of the larger size of Chiwei VI10 are undoubtedly exposed. If the size of the frame is smaller, it will be more beautiful and more suitable for handheld operation.

[Summarize and comment, the good and bad are mixed, and the performance is acceptable.]

Through the experience of using the two tablets, we can find that there are more or less problems with the domestic Qianyuan Ping An, but because of its low price, acceptable performance, and basically universal mainstream applications, it can be regarded as the choice of users with tight budgets. 1000 yuan domestic tablet Internet access, video, document editing, etc. can be competent, while playing CF, LOL and other mainstream online competitive games with low image quality is not a problem. However, there is still a gap in performance compared with mainstream notebook desktops. Users can select according to their own budget and needs.