After the name of the strongest camera was transferred from Samsung S6 and LG G4 to Note5, LG launched a new series of models LG V10. Can it defeat Samsung's flagship again as it defeated S6?

The port media in the Asian gray goods distribution center have obtained the LG V10 mass production machine and compared it with Note5. Now let's take a look at the level of LG's new flagship.

PS： In the sample sheet group, problems such as "different focus, obvious metering gap, shaking hands, too large depth of the target scene, and many macro samples that are difficult to unify the focus" have occurred, leading to a certain decline in sample availability and contrast. The real decisive result has to be compared with the official evaluation.

day

Scenario 1

Scene 1, central zoom in

Scene 1, zoomed in at the bottom right of the center

Scene 1, zoom in above the center (note the noise in the sky)

Scenario 2

Scene 2, central zoom in

LG's ancestral powerful sharpening algorithm is added. V10's daytime picture sharpness is still unbelievable. Although Note5 also has rich picture details, the picture sharpness/discrimination is still a little poor. As the price of sharpening, the noise of V10 images will become more serious.

Macro

Scenario 3, Miniature Model

Scene 4, front of miniature model

Scene 4, zoom in below the center

Under the sunlight macro distance, the white balance and metering of the two machines are very close, and the image tolerance of Note5 is relatively higher. However, there are not many details of the macro scenery itself, and V10's hair counting advantage is no longer obvious. It is difficult to find their differences even if you zoom in to the hair counting level.

Indoor lighting

Scenario 5

Scene 5, central zoom in

Scenario 6

Scene 6, central zoom in

V10 inherits the feature that G4 is brighter in the weak light picture Lower contrast; In terms of white balance, V10 is bluer and colder, and Note5 is warmer and yellower. These two aspects lead to V10 samples not as pleasing as Note5.

PS： Because of the obvious signs of shaking hands, the two proofs cannot be compared.

Scene 7, central magnification (V10 signboard is slightly bright, resulting in overexposure of the light box, but more dark details are obtained)

Outdoor lighting

Scene 8 (In the ultra complex light, the night scene mode is not triggered on both sides. The left light box of V10 is overexposed, but the right side lacks dark details, and the image tolerance is much smaller than Note5)

Scenario 9

Scene 9, central zoom in

In the night scene with sufficient light, the ISO of both machines can run below 150, and the performance characteristics are similar to those of the daytime. V10's discrimination is really strong, but sharpening makes the font edge appear white.

Scenario 10

Scene 10, central zoom in

Scene 10, zoom in from the center

In scenario 10, Note5 still does not trigger the automatic night view mode even when the ISO reaches 1250, while V10 has triggered the night view mode and erased the ISO information. In V10, there is a big gap between the analytical power and the purity of the image. This performance is actually close to that of Note5 versus G4.

In general, V10's performance is very similar to that of G4. In the daytime, the analytical power is fierce, the light measurement is slightly bright under weak light, and the white balance is occasionally slightly cold. The bad news is probably that V10 just moved the G4 photo module, which has not improved significantly compared with G4, so it still lost to Note5

Sample source: