Snapdragon 800, Exynos 5420 Version Note 3 Performance Duel | Love Computer - 上海419贵族宝贝-上海后花园1314-上海品茶网-阿拉爱上海

and Same, At the time of release, it has been announced that it will launch dual platforms (of course, the Galaxy S4 is more ridiculous in the later period, and the third platform has been released). Note 3 uses the current top-level dual platform, And Samsung's own Exynos 5420. We have already introduced the performance of Exynos 5420 in the detailed evaluation of the international N900. In this evaluation, we will see who is the real performance king of the dual version Note 3.

This time we are testing the international version of Note 3. The models are SM-N900 and SM-N9005. First, let's take a look at the specification comparison ▼

It can be seen that the SM-N9005 has advantages in supporting the network and 4K video, while the SM-N900 seems to be at a disadvantage in terms of specifications. I hope it can "pull back" in our next test (hereinafter referred to as N9005 and N900).

This test is divided into four parts, CPU theory and comprehensive test, GPU theory test, actual game frame number comparison and daily operation video comparison.

CPU and comprehensive theory scores

Angu Rabbit Evaluation 4.0

As for An Tutu, I think it's better to look at them. They are at the same level ▼

Vellamo 2.0

The HTML5 part N9005 is slightly higher, while the Metal part N900 is slightly higher ▼

The N9005 is not functioning properly, because we have tested the E330s with the same SoC, and it takes less than 29 seconds to complete the test. It is estimated that ▼ is caused by CPU frequency reduction

Sunspider 1.0.1

Chrome Beta is used uniformly for testing. This test is the traditional strength of A15. The N900 won without any doubt, and the gap is relatively large (the lower the score, the better) ▼

GBA simulator

Using the built-in Benchmark of GBA.emu (1.5.12), the test object is a 14KB bios.zip. This test can more accurately reflect the CPU's computing power. The N900 is still strong, leaving the N9005 a lot of ▼

Video software decoding

Video software decoding is also an important test item to measure the general performance of CPU. This test item tests the multithreading performance of CPU, which is different from video hard solution. It is a method to test the general computing ability of CPU, and multi-core processors will be used. The following tests use BSPlayer 1.9.153 version, and the video used is 1080P ref16 FPS60 MP4 video

N9005， Average 38 frames ▼

N900， Average 50 frames ▼

GPU theory test

GFXBench 2.7.2

The score of N9005 is very high, which is the same as the E330s we tested before. Of course, the 2.5 test is still inferior to N900 ▼

BaseMark X

The performance of the N9005 is still strong. Both OnScreen and OffScreen are the highest level among the devices we have tested. The N900 is not very eye-catching

N9005, Onscreen: 18.1 frames, Offscreen: 16.4 frames ▼

N900, Onscreen: 14.2 frames, Offscreen: 12.5 frames ▼

3DMark

The performance of N9005 is still very high, and it is the highest score in Physics among the devices we have tested, while the performance of N900 in 3DMark is not very good ▼

Graph performance theory test comparison chart ▼

Game frame number test

In the game test, of course, we will present the "Three Day King of Racing" for Android game test. In addition, the commonly used modern war 4 has no comparability because the dragon 800 is played with low special effects. Most of the Wild Speed Racing 8 are locked at 30 frames, so they will not participate in this comparison.

Wild drag racing 7 1.1.0 (Shanghai track)

The Shanghai track of Wild Speed Racing 7 has a lot of pressure on the GPU. The N900 has performed quite well, but it still lags behind the N9005. Both of them have no problem in terms of fluency.

N9005， Average 51 frames ▼

N900， Average 40 frames ▼

Real car 3 1.3.5 (the first track in the game)

The performance of the two is similar, both exceeding 45 frames. Even if there are many vehicles, they can still maintain more than 30 frames.

N9005， Average 48 frames ▼

N900， Average 47 frames ▼

Top Speed Car 17 (the first runway in the game)

In "no load" operation, both of them have reached the 50 frame mark on average. The N9005 performs better and is not far from the full frame.

N9005， Average 55 frames ▼

N900， Average 50 frames ▼

Game Frame Comparison Chart ▼

Video comparison test

In the video, we selected some specific scenes for testing, such as application loading, application installation, camera processing, folder compression, etc. ▼
From the video, it can be seen that both of them are at a high level in terms of the overall smoothness of the system. In the test of the system's own camera, the processing speed of HDR and HDR is the same, and the N900 has a greater advantage in the night scene anti shake. In the web page test, the N900 still has some advantages, and their performance in the microblog client is basically the same. In the game installation (Iron Man GPK, capacity 800MB) test, the N9005 has a great advantage in the process of decompressing the data package, but when the game is installed, the N900 significantly shortens the gap, and almost completes the game installation at the same time as the N9005. In the process of entering the game, the gap between the two is not big, and the N900 has a slight advantage. Finally, in the folder compression test (using the ZArchiver test, the folder exceeded 500MB), the N900 also broke the previous record set by the E330S. It took less than five minutes to complete the compression test, and the performance was quite powerful.

summary

According to our four major tests, the N900 and N9005 undoubtedly represent the most powerful performance of Android phones, and the comparison between them is really interesting. In terms of CPU performance, the N900 has gained overwhelming advantages with the high-frequency quad core A15, and defeated the N9005 using Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 in all CPU tests. In terms of GPU performance, the N9005 still holds the strongest title of Adreno 330. Of course, in the actual game test, the N9005 does not lead by a large margin in the actual frame number. With Samsung's constant optimization in the game, the N900's game frame number is likely to even catch up. From this comparative test, except for users who have special needs for 4G networks and 4K video, it is obvious that the N900 is more recommended (this is only for WCDMA users, and it is better for mobile and telecom users to purchase the corresponding customized version). The super powerful CPU performance and the GPU performance that is not the top but can fully meet the user's needs make this new Orion shine.