Author: Jin Nan
After decades of warm-up, a three hour debate between Hammer Mobile and Zealer team finally ended last night. In fact, this may be the most eye-catching confrontation ever in the domestic science and technology field, because you can't even find a comparable reference. It happened between a former English teacher and a former English major.
In a sense, Wang Ziyou is just an outlet for all the problems of the hammer
As far as the debate itself is concerned, Wang Ziyou didn't win at all. On the one hand, Luo Yonghao has always been in control of the rhythm from the official engagement on August 12 to the debate scene, and the large character board prepared by him has always been broken down on the spot like the outline of the speech, but Wang Ziyou's a stack of materials and two boxes of mobile phones have only been flipped and opened a few times; On the other hand, Wang Ziran's attitude towards Luo Yonghao was so low that his respect and politeness towards Luo Yonghao and his attitude of hoping for peace talks made him appear suspicious and guilty in front of Luo Yonghao, who was "not playing the fool".
More importantly, Wang Ziyou was too nervous at the scene. Several times he began to talk, but he stumbled seriously. After saying nothing, he took the initiative to ask Luo Yonghao back, which led to his right of speech once again falling into the hands of the latter. On the other hand, Luo Yonghao speaks clearly and endorses fluently, with almost no nonsense - but it should be noted that this does not represent Luo Yonghao's victory, but only reflects his eloquence and full preparation.
Does Wang Zibo have any problems? Yes, for one thing, it is too old-fashioned and take for granted, but the debate is irregular, and the other party is a "tough" person, which makes Wang Ziyou feel naive; Secondly, it may be due to the fear of defeating others without fighting. Therefore, although we realized that there were some mistakes in our own aspects after the release of the evaluation, we did not publish them, which further confirmed Luo Yonghao's view that Zealer deliberately blackhammered the mobile phone, and thus destroyed Wang Ziyou's trust foundation; Thirdly, Wang Ziyou's preparation was not sufficient, not to mention the things on the table, but in terms of content and psychology. He may not have thought that Luo Yonghao would expose all the problems of Zealer. The direct result of this is that after Luo Yonghao attacked himself from the evaluation itself to the moral and legal issues, Wang Ziyou can no longer fight back, because his manuscript is still around the product. But who would believe a person who is "morally deficient" and "knows the law and violates the law"? In other words, who will care about the problems of the hammer after knowing so many stories about Zealer?
Zealer is the most influential evaluation organization in China, and there is almost no doubt about this. In order to pull it down, Luo Yonghao even praises a friend he despises for one purpose, That is, by proving that Zealer is untrustworthy, all negative reports about the Hammer are questioned again, and the statement that Wang Ziyou is close to "killing" also provides an opportunity to vent all the problems of the Hammer since its birth.
What height should the evaluation reach?
Simply speaking, Luo Yonghao is targeting Wang Ziyou, but in fact, Luo Yonghao is targeting the entire evaluation industry. It's like a big country is shot when it is diplomatic with a small country on a certain issue. On the surface, it is dissatisfied with its authorities, but in fact, it ignores the people of the whole country.
The question raised by Luo Yonghao against Zealer is exactly the common problem faced by the domestic evaluation industry, first of all, the evaluation sample and quantity, It's true that Zeale has money, but most of the industry's evaluators have no source of funds. Some of the evaluators I know, because of limited funds, most of the evaluation equipment was bought by swiping their own cards. After the evaluation, they sold it to pay off their card debts, and they had to rely on a website or enthusiastic netizens to provide equipment for evaluation. Then whether there was only one equipment, Is it untrustworthy that there is no way to give a wide range of samples and the results of the reference evaluation institutions?
Secondly, there is the question of whether the evaluation itself is professional or not. Luo Yonghao believes that the evaluators should not only pretend to understand, but also improve their professionalism to be consistent with the manufacturers and relevant professions. This is understandable at first, but in fact, it can not be ignored that evaluation is the same as writing film reviews and music reviews from a certain point of view, and the latter two are usually amateur or even ridiculous in the eyes of professional directors and composers, but what if the work conveys feelings to others? You can't think that the other person is not qualified to talk about your work because he or she is not professional enough. Luo Yonghao blames Wang Zifang for being out of the industry, but why not be a non professional who started to give advice before entering the industry?
In addition, besides providing purchase suggestions for users, the evaluation itself also provides a considerable number of people who have no purchase demand or ability, but who have hobbies in the industry with the experience of watching and entertainment, which is the same as people who love football and e-sports, do not have to play in person, but can enjoy a sense of immersive experience by watching the game.
Objectively speaking, the problem of sample size and team professionalism can be solved through money, which is also one of the most critical issues in the debate last night. Should the evaluation organization collect money? The answer is yes, because it needs to survive. But Zealer's lifeblood is that its "independent" and "third-party" qualifications will be removed after receiving the manufacturer's money. This is indeed a problem for Zealer, but Luo Yonghao believes that after accepting the investment, he will not be objective, and totally denies the value of the evaluator. It is obviously the same unreasonable way as the indignant youth who accuse Alibaba of having shares in Softbank and Yahoo.
Who cares about consumers?
Luo Yonghao exposed all the problems of Zealer's debut so far. It seems to be full of justice, but in fact it is very nasty. Because it is certain that if Wang Ziyou didn't raise so many questions in the evaluation of the Hammer mobile phone, Luo Yonghao would certainly not say these things. In the future, he will interact with Wang Ziyou, and even ask Wang Ziyou to do a paid consultation at T2. However, once standing on the opposite side, they reveal everything, even exchange information privately, open up the hidden rules of the industry and remove the relevant laws, which is totally different from the act of smashing Siemens refrigerators to protect their rights, because the former is completely out of revenge.
But one thing is certain, that is, both of them are not really speaking for consumers. Wang Ziyou may want to say, but it is not ruled out that he hopes to use this to overcome his disadvantages. During the whole debate, various problems encountered by users of the Hammer mobile phone were either discussed in the future or prevaricated on the spot—— Luo Yonghao thinks Wang Ziyou should apologize to Hammer Mobile, but in fact, both of them should apologize to users of Hammer Mobile.
Win the debate, lose the character of Hammer and Luo Yonghao
Many people believe that Luo Yonghao lost more than won, on the one hand, out of sympathy for the weak, on the other hand, out of disrespect for Luo Yonghao, including interruption, ridicule, ridicule and abuse. In the end, the number of people who will buy Hammer mobile phones because of this debate will certainly not be more than those who give up, For most users or potential users of the Hammer mobile phone, Luo Yonghao and his feelings are the biggest signboard. But after seeing Luo Yonghao's performance last night, I believe that many people will turn from passers-by to passers-by, who will become more and more black.
However, Luo Yonghao's goal is still completed, that is, to take Wang freely and screen his supporters again. The rest must be genuine powder, which is enough for the current situation of hammer.
What about Luo Yonghao's character? In the whole debate, Luo Yonghao did not regard Wang Ziyou as a qualified opponent, not even a junior, not a practitioner. Since it is a debate, there should be exchanges, but Luo Yonghao did not give Wang Ziyou the opportunity. He interrupted in various forms and brought the scene to his own speech session for many times, which is very disrespectful to Wang Ziyou and Zealer. In addition to the blow to the evaluation industry itself, it is certain that people in the evaluation industry will be more cautious about the evaluation of the Hammer mobile phone in the future, and once a black spot is identified, it may even open up the information channels between industries and unanimously blackout the Hammer mobile phone.
In addition, Luo Yonghao will dig the roots of Wang Ziyou and even announce his private exchanges, which will also alert some partners. After all, there are industry insiders everywhere, and Luo Yonghao may sell them someday. From this point of view, Luo Yonghao is not an insider scavenger in the industry. He just changed his clothes and became a sentimental rascal.
