As the latest flagship of HTC, it can be said that Droid DNA carries too many expectations of HTC. Indeed, under the attack of Samsung and Apple, HTC's market share has shrunk too much. Can the DNA with the highest resolution and pixel density on the market beat Samsung's flagship Galaxy S3?
The video comparison and evaluation brought by foreign technology peers from the four aspects of fuselage design, screen, performance score and photography.
1、 Airframe design
Samsung still continues the design of plastic fuselage on S3, plus the coating and polishing technology of hyperglaze, which can be said to be a comfort to all computer users. HTC has made great efforts on Droid DNA. The back of the fuselage has a slope design, and the thinnest part is only 4mm. Careful netizens can find that DNA and HTC's new Windows Phone 8X have the same back design, both adopting similar slope design. This benefit is obvious. The arc design on the back makes the machine feel very good in the hand. In general, HTC is better than others in the selection and design of fuselage materials.
2、 Screen
In this respect, there is almost no suspense. DNA is the winner of S3. At present, there is no machine on the market that can defeat DNA. As described by the technology peers in the video above, this panel owned by DNA is simply "unbeatable". Samsung's Super AMOLED screen also won over DNA only in black performance
The DNA screen is amazing
3、 Running points
The processor of the US version S3 is not Samsung's own Exynos, but Qualcomm's processor. Since Qualcomm did not mass produce the quad core S4 Pro when S3 was released, the US version of the Galaxy S3 only uses dual cores for processing. This also resulted in a large gap between the two in running points.
4、 Camera imaging
In this regard, the reviewers found that there was a big gap between the two. Droid DNA is not much different from S3 when there is sufficient outdoor light, and it performs well. However, under low light conditions, the gap is very obvious. If the engine oil has been evaluated by the foreign technology peers I brought before, you should still be impressed. There is something wrong with the expression of DNA under weak light, and the image is blurred. This is somewhat different from the line where HTC started to focus on photographing in ONE series, and the author is also puzzled. You can check 。
last
As described in the evaluation video, DNA is the latest machine, so it uses almost the latest and highest configuration. The 1080P screen is the best example. However, S3 has totally outperformed DNA in terms of removable battery and expandable storage. I believe that this is also what many hardcore players are pursuing. All functions are different.