Users who like to play with computers are generally familiar with the software. It can not only detect the general configuration information of a model, but also measure the general performance of a product in the form of scoring. Recently, this software has been upgraded from v2 to v3, and a lot of changes have been made. Now let's compare the specific differences between the two software versions.

▲ The most intuitive icon has changed (v2 on the left and v3 on the right)

▲ After entering the software, the initial interface becomes more concise and graphical (v2 on the left and v3 on the right)

▲ The test option selection interface is clearer and simpler (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

▲ The latest flagship models are added to the horizontal ranking (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

It can be seen that the interface design of v2 and v3 software is not very different. In addition to some concise changes in style, the overall layout is relatively similar. Users can use the new version of the software according to their previous habits, which is also convenient to operate.

Now let's use Xiaomi 2 to run the new and old versions of software respectively for scoring. Will there be any difference between the two on the same model?

▲ The running score of Xiaomi 2 improved significantly (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

▲ The improvement of running points is mainly reflected in GPU (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

You may want to use the Huawei Glory Quad Core Love Edition for a comparison test.

▲ The score of Huawei Glory Quad Core Love Edition increased significantly (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

▲ Ranking of Huawei Glory Quad Core Love Edition (Version v2 on the left and version v3 on the right)

It can be seen from the results that using v2 and v3 versions of Anthare software to run scores on the same model, the results are quite different. The scores of the new version of Anthare software are higher than those of the old version, and the main growth is in the GPU link. This is mainly because in the previous 2. x version, the testing rules were more biased towards the CPU than the GPU. As users pay more attention to the GPU, the Anthare evaluation official has also adjusted the standard of hardware indicators, increasing the proportion of graphics chips in v3.0, which can better reflect the complete performance of an Android device.

Of course, finally, it should be emphasized that at present, the score of any software can only be used as one of the reference standards to measure the quality of a product, and cannot comprehensively control the quality of a product. After all, mobile terminal products are still experience oriented, and the impact of product design, materials, process, system optimization, etc. on the overall experience cannot be ignored. Therefore, it is not recommended to blindly pursue high scores, and more attention should be paid to practical experience.

About the author