One Plus Ace 3 was released on January 4. Snapdragon 8 Gen 2+BOE X1's 1.5K curved screen+IMX890 main camera+500mAh battery+high-order ultra-thin fingerprint, priced from 2599 yuan (version 12+256).
[Brief configuration of Yijia Ace 3] Snapdragon 8 Gen 25500mAh battery+100W fast charge. Metal middle frame+fingerprint under ultra-thin screen+infrared, 207g weight. The 6.78 inch 120Hz 2780x1264 curved screen+8T LTPO+gorilla Victus 2 glass of BOE X1 substrate has a full white peak of 1600 nits. IMX890 OIS main camera+800W ultra wide angle.
RMB 2599 for 12+256 version, RMB 2999 for 16+512 version, and RMB 3499 for 16+1TB version.
Appearance&Workmanship&Hand&Fingerprint Identification&External Release&Vibration
Green factory signboard, 100W 9.1A super current magic change A quick charger.
The mobile phone case delivered by Mingsha Gold is between coffee and flesh.
Even though the owners of Shenzhen Bay No. 1 have seen countless machines, it is the first time to see such original color matching.
iQOO Neo9 Pro、 One Plus 12, One Plus Ace 3, Redmi K70 Pro ↑
iQOO Neo9 Pro、 One Plus 12, One Plus Ace 3, Redmi K70 Pro ↑
I am used to seeing the large camera matrix and giant camera aperture of One Plus 12, but now I feel a bit too "polite" when I look at Ace 3.
The outer side of the camera ring is very delicate and calibrated stainless steel decoration, while the aluminum alloy middle frame and the left side of the camera are all made of frosted materials, so this time we close our eyes and recommend the exclusive Star Black color matching of silk AG glass (There are also vertical lines, which can be judged by the superior) 。
Our Mingsha Gold color matching, which is translated from Chinese, is actually the pink color that girls prefer and men like best. The back cover is very easy to be stained with fingerprints, and the bottom layer of the glass has mirror coating, Each press of fingers can be clearly recorded and displayed. The mirror back cover shows seam, which is not suitable for the design with complex radians and interface materials.
Ah, yes. In the future, the volume button should be placed on the common right side of OPPO/Plus.
Fingerprint under high position ultra-thin screen (The only non short focus fingerprint model nearby) 0809 X-axis motor (Normal enough level), Raytheon 1012H+1115E double lift (external performance is really close to one plus 12, medium to high level), infrared+NFC, Xinsi S3910P touch IC.
The protection level is unknown, with rain touch control (the foreboding is around IP64?)
Objective test: screen&performance&heating&endurance&charging
(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)
One Plus Ace 3 is a 6.78 inch 120Hz 1.5K central perforated curved screen, 2780x1264, BOE X1 base material (that is, the first X1 of One Plus 12, and the real GT5 Pro is BOE S1), 8T LPTO, with gorilla Victus 2 glass cover, OPPO Display P1 display chip, and Pixelworks single display chip (model number PX8778, claiming that all games can be opened at the same time with 1.5K super score and 120Hz super frame). There is also a 3-pulse+monopulse DC+2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming of the same model.
Although the base material is the same as the one plus 12, the one plus Ace 3 is a 1.5K screen, Brightness output will be better (The full white brightness is 781 nits, and the local brightness is 875 nits, second only to the real GT5 Pro).
The central 781 nit, the four corners 781/785/771/766 nit, the extreme value 19 nit, The brightness uniformity is normal. The 780 manual full white brightness without any settings is a good civilization. I hope other manufacturers can follow up quickly.
The color accuracy is average, Set it to the factory default vivid mode (corresponding to P3 color standard).
Ironically, after not adjusting according to the high color standard, netizens generally reported that the screen of Ace 3 was "more transparent". Most users are more interested in eye-catching color mixing. They do not know the concept of color accuracy and restoration, nor do they care at all, which once again confirms the difficulty of adhering to the color accuracy line from the side.
CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)
Flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar is for each column, the stronger it is)
One plus Ace 3 is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. My old friend, the provincial stream is better than one plus Ace 2 Pro this time.
(room temperature 23.5 ℃, 200 nit screen brightness)
One Ace 3 in 3DMark toaster, the maximum is 47.7 degrees, and the front is more than 3 degrees higher than the back.
3DMark Wild Life Ulimited stability is 99.6%, Extreme Ulimited stability is 92.6%, and Solar Bay stability is 99.8%.
No kidding, add Ace 3 It should be the flagship/sub flagship with the best thermal stability in recent years 。
It will slightly press the output, and then firmly run the whole distance at an acceptable temperature. Moved, finally! Finally!
In the same environment, after 20 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing, the maximum temperature is 36.2 degrees, and the performance is OK.
(Endurance test: the test environment is 24 ℃ room temperature, 200 nit screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%. It includes 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback at station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surf, a total of 2.5 hours)
One plus Ace 3 is a 5500mAh dual cell+SUPERCOOEC S power management chip.
The remaining battery life is 79%, which is the same level as Ace 2 Pro, and does not meet our expectations for the 5500mAh battery. The main reason is that the game part (eating chicken) is a little too vigorous, which reduces the performance.
(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo super fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent super fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low power fast charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default and need to turn them on manually)
5500mAh battery+100W fast charge, the body displays full charge in 24 minutes, but the charge is not stopped until 30.5 minutes.
The performance and one plus 12 can't be said to be very different, but the same. It belongs to the fast 100W, It can bite the 120W of the blue factory (the blue factory has almost no UI full time, so it seems to be particularly disadvantaged).
photograph
One plus Ace 3 It is an old friend of Sony IMX890 OIS (1 μ m, 1/1.56 type, 5000W)+800W ultra wide angle (IMX355800W, 1/4 type, 1.12 μ m)+200W tactical macro, and claims to have a core image algorithm of one plus 12.
As the owner of Shenzhen Bay No.1, we only have iQOO Neo9 Pro and Redmi K70 Pro with a name of Pro and positioning higher than One Plus Ace 3 as competitors (their main photography is the same as Neo9 and K70, and their main photography performance depends on everyone's brain):
iQOO Neo9 Pro It is an IMX920 with 50 million pixels and 1 μ m, F1.88+OIS。 The difference between the iQOO Neo9 standard version and the iQOO Neo9 standard version is that the ultra wide angle is changed from an OV08D1 of 8 million pixels to a JN1 of 50 million pixels (F2.0).
Redmi K70 Pro It is the 50 megapixel light and shadow hunter 800 (OV50E), 1 μ m, 1/1.55 ", F1.68+OIS. Its difference from the K70 standard version is that the ultra wide angle is from the 8 megapixel OV08D1 (iQOO: Alas, what a coincidence?) Instead of OV13B10 (1.12 μ m, F2.2) trimmed to 12 million pixels, there is a double light and shadow hunter 400 (OV50D, 5000W, 1/2.88 ", 0.6 μ m, F1.9, no OIS).
Ultra wide angle contrast
Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central magnification (800W ultra wide angle field of view is one circle smaller)
Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification (the difference in night view algorithm makes Ace 3 win over K70 Pro...)
Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification
Ultra wide angle contrast 5, global and central amplification
Comparison of main camera, 2x and 5x "zoom"
Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast 1, central amplification (K70 Pro is twice physical, and has certain advantages when the light is good)
"5x zoom" compared with 1, central amplification (continue to increase, only K70 Pro's physical telephoto has been improved)
Main camera contrast 2, global and central amplification
"2x zoom" contrast 2, central amplification (K70 Pro here is a physical telephoto, but the light is slightly weak, it can not open the gap)
"2x zoom" vs. 2, central magnification (when pulled to 5x, only iQOO Neo9 Pro has a certain improvement)
Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification
Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification
"5x zoom" compared with 5, central amplification (iQOO Neo9 Pro's 5x "shake music" algorithm is significantly stronger)
Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification
In actual effect, Ace 3's main camera can't compete with K70 Pro and iQOO Neo9 Pro, and its analytical power is weaker. The good news is that the sharpening force is relatively light, and OPPO/Ace's night scene algorithm is stronger than Redmi's.
At the beginning, I thought that the 8 million pixel tactical UWA of the standard version was not comparable to the normal UWA of the Pro version. As a result, with Ace 3's ultra wide angle, the dim light night scene is stronger than the K70 Pro's 12 million pixel ultra wide angle
(Our world's top 500 studios have used the CPU frequency levitation tool ↑ for nearly 8 years, and the networking cannot be installed, so it needs to be disconnected)
Finally, let's talk about ColorOS 14.
The new system has some new functions such as floating notification and file opening at will similar to Smart Island, but its stability is not as good as that of the previous generation. There are also some small problems such as high power consumption of the native browser. The probability of occasional stuttering is higher than before, and software management is more strict than before ↑
Of course, there are also constant things, such as the response speed in most of the time, the background that can only lock 5 non whitelist, the strict restrictions on third-party desktops, and the strict restrictions on background management ￥ # @% ￥ #...... ￥%&@
The system part really needs to be strengthened. Come on, Green Factory, your performance will directly affect the mobile phone users of the three brands
summary
With Ace 3, compared with Ace 2 Pro, although the X-axis motor was changed from 0916 to 0809, the screen with higher brightness was replaced, the battery capacity increased to 5500mAh, and the metal middle frame was used. As a result, it was 3g lighter, and the release price was 400 yuan lower. "I really don't think you can get it.".
In the actual performance of the machine, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (performance and thermal stability) is better tuned, and its endurance is not as expected, but it is also the top batch. One of the most distinctive features of Ace 3 is its eye protecting screen and the only high-order ultra-thin fingerprint of its peers.
With Ace 3, Redmi K70, and iQOO Neo9, iQOO's photography is relatively stronger. With Ace 3 and K70, iQOO's photography is 50% open:
High EQ: the last two are still the IMX766/890 analogs of the previous generation, while one plus 12 uses a stronger LYT-808
Low EQ: The last two are both equipped with the same new main camera sensors as their own big brother, and the Ace 3 still maintains the previous generation of sensors
Comparison between Ace 3 and Redmi K70 The main reason is that there is no 2K screen, and the fast charging is a little weak (the actual protection level may be higher with Ace 3). The endurance of Ace 3 is stronger with high fingerprint. The entry and top configurations are 100 yuan more expensive, and the middle configuration is the same price.
Comparison between Ace 3 and iQOO Neo9 The main reasons are that there are gaps in photography, motor, lightness and thinness, and system. With Ace 3's strong endurance, there is no knife movement in GPS/Beidou band, and the metal middle frame, high fingerprint, and screen are obviously more eye friendly (especially before the full brightness high-frequency PWM firmware in January in iQOO legend came out), but the same configuration costs 200 to 300 yuan.
If iQOO Neo9's must kill skill is its price and lightness, this handsome guy thinks that the core difference of Ace 3 is actually a music screen that many people don't want. The curved screen is inconvenient to apply film and has a higher chance of false touch. However, in this price range, the curved screen is rare. The positive sense of high level is really dominated by the curved screen.
Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer
Follow our WeChat official account: playphone
Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer
