Redmi Note 13 Pro+evaluation: RMB 1899 1.5K curved screen+IP6.8+2 billion pixels
Redmi Note 13 Pro+evaluation: RMB 1899 1.5K curved screen+IP6.8+2 billion pixels

Redmi Note 13 Pro/13 Pro+was released on the evening of September 21. The feature of Redmi Note 13 Pro+is music screen+IP6.8+2 billion pixels+120W fast charge, the first launch of Tianji 7200 Ultra, starting from 1899 yuan (12+256).

The Redmi Note 13 Pro is the first Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The same panel is made into a straight screen, the same 200 million pixels, 5100mAh battery+67W fast charge, starting from 1399 yuan (8+128).

Redmi Note 13 Pro+is Tianji 7200 Ultra, 6.67 inch 1.5K Huaxing C7 middle perforated curved screen pOLED, with a peak value of 1800nit. 200 megapixel Samsung HP3 Discovery Edition (1/1.4 ")+OIS, 800W ultra wide angle+200W macro. 5000mAh battery+120W fast charge, IP68199/204.5g weight.

The first 12+256 version costs 1899 yuan, 12+512 version 2099 yuan, and 16+512 version 2199 yuan.


appearance

 

Xiaomi/Redmi is familiar with the 120W GaN magic modified A mouth quick charger, which is compatible with the 65W PD quick charger in addition to the private agreement, and can charge the notebook.  


The mobile phone case and clip delivered by Redmi Note 13 Pro+are no longer the simple clean water case and clip clip. They are all advanced at once, and even make me feel that the world is a bit unreal.

Wearing the case is like changing a mobile phone. It blocks the plastic middle frame. You said that the phones sold for 3 or 4000 are trusted.


Redmi K60 Pro, Redmi Note 13 Pro+, K60 Premium, One Plus Ace 2 Pro ↑


Redmi K60 Pro, Redmi Note 13 Pro+, K60 Premium, One Plus Ace 2 Pro ↑



The design level of the rear cover of Redmi Note 13 Pro+, There is only one inference: Maybe Xiaomi Are all designers recruited by Redmi.

Among the four color schemes, the shallow dream space and the limited edition of Aape trend are recommended with eyes closed. Shallow Dream Space is the only four pigment skin splicing process in the whole series, and it is 5.5 g (199g) lighter than the glass back cover version.

  • Workmanship: The virtual position of the key is small, and the gap control is OK.

  • feel: The weight of the glass plate is 204.5g, which cannot be considered as light and thin. But after all, it is a curved screen. The body is narrow and has a positive and negative curved surface. It is more comfortable to coil.

  • External placement is quite good: 1012+1519, the lower speaker is the first to launch the two in one acoustic motor of Raytheon Technology, which is located at the lower right corner of the fuselage and is huge. In fact, although it is not as good as the Xiaomi 10 music phone, its volume and sense of space are obviously far away from its peers, and its sound field is relatively middle. The press conference didn't mention this, which is totally unlike the Redmi I know.

  • Vibration: The 1519 lower speaker is also an X-axis linear motor, which is significantly stronger than the common 0809. The two in one of Raytheon Technology is a good civilization.

  • Short focus optical fingerprint: Normal performance, lower position. The straight screen Redmi Note 13 Pro is also an optical fingerprint, and the side fingerprint may gradually withdraw from the stage of Redmi history.

  • Infrared, NFC, single frequency GPS+single frequency Beidou (Pro version is dual frequency Beidou)

IP68 is the most prominent peripheral configuration.

In addition, the first sale of Redmi Note 13 Pro+has a 1-year screen shattering insurance, which is confident in its ability to resist falling. And the maintenance price of this 1.5K music screen is only 450 yuan. At twice the price, you can take a taxi to Apple to replace a 3349mAh battery that supports 20W fast charging and drink another cup of milk tea.


Objective test: screen&performance&heating&endurance&charging

(In the screen test, the longer the brightness color bar, the better, and the shorter the color deviation color bar, the better)

Redmi Note 13 Pro+is a 6.67 inch 120Hz Huaxing C7 middle perforated curved screen pOLED, with full screen peak of 1200 nits, local peak of 1800 nits, and gorilla Victus glass. 2712x1220446ppi, 240Hz touch sampling rate, 2160Hz instantaneous. Low brightness 1920Hz high-frequency PWM dimming+high brightness DC dimming.

Brightness, color accuracy (P3 color accuracy in the factory default mode is stronger than the sRGB color accuracy in the professional mode, and there is no need to manually change it), uniformity (maximum difference of 5 nits at full white maximum brightness), etc. are all good.

Apart from the fact that the original factory's film will have some small color dot effect when seen close to it (recommend replacing it if you care), The actual performance of this 1.5K music screen is completely worthy of its own price


CPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)


GPU performance test (for each column, the longer the color bar, the stronger it is)



Flash memory read/write performance (the longer the color bar is for each column, the stronger it is)

Redmi Note 13 Pro+launched Tianji 7200 Ultra (TSMC N4P process, 2x2.8G A715+6x2G A510 Refreshed, Mali G610 MC4), 4000mm ² VC soaking plate, LPDDR5+UFS 3.1.

Tianji 7200 Ultra is a "weak U strong display" setting, and GPU performance is significantly better than CPU:

  • actual CPU multi-core performance, sandwiched between Snapdragon 778G and Tianji 7050 , and single core performance is significantly stronger.

  • The most surprising thing is GPU performance exceeded Tianji 1100 , almost touching the bottom of Snapdragon 870.

  • Our version is 512GB, and the flash memory performance is good, but limited by the SoC performance, Random read-write performance and Snapdragon 778G series 50/50


Although the score of Tianji 7200 Ultra is higher than that of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 of the Note 13 Pro (Samsung 4nm process, CPU is four 2.4GHz cores+four 1.95GHz cores), it is driven up by the ultra class GPU performance.

More influential on daily fluency In terms of CPU performance, Tianji 7200 Ultra cannot compete with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 With the high frequency dual core of TSMC's advanced manufacturing process, there is no way to win the four core of Samsung's technology: in GeekBench 6.1, the CPU of Tianji 7200 Ultra has a single core 1091 and a multi-core 2651. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 scored 1012 points for single core and 2943 points for multi core (the scores leaked before release).


(Room temperature 24.8 ℃, 200 nit screen brightness)

The maximum temperature of 3DMark toaster is 39.1 degrees.

3DMark Wild Life Ulimited and Extreme Ulimited test stability, 99.6% and 99.7% respectively. The performance mode is close to the level.


In the same environment, after 20 minutes of Peace Elite HDR+limited frames+anti aliasing, the maximum temperature is 39.5 degrees.

Tianji 7200 Ultra is not very hot, and the thermal stability of Redmi Note 13 Pro+is very good.

Distribution block 4000mm ² VC soaking plate, more or less regarded Fage as the dragon 888. This leads to the strange heat feeling of Redmi Note 13 Pro+: the heat is transferred quickly, but it is also warm at the end


(Endurance test: the test environment is 25 ℃ room temperature, 200 nit screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%. It includes 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD+limit frames+anti aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback at station B, 30 minutes of short video on microblog, 30 minutes of Wi Fi and 5G surf, a total of 2.5 hours)

Redmi Note 13 Pro+is 5000mAh battery+120W fast charge, The endurance performance is satisfactory , which is the same as the previous generation of Tianji 1080, mainly due to the high power consumption of games.


120W fast charge, 100W peak, lasting for 3 minutes.

 

(The charging test starts at 1%. The longer the color bar in the same line, the faster the speed is ↑. The vivo super fast charging mode/OPPO intelligent super fast charging/millet fast charging acceleration and low power fast charging and other functions have been turned on. Some manufacturers/models turn off relevant functions by default and need to turn them on manually)

The 120W fast charge of Redmi Note 13 Pro+shows 100% in 21 minutes, and the charge is cut off in 23 minutes. It performs well and is a bit more radical than the K60 Premium.


photograph

Redmi Note 13 Pro+is 200 million pixels, Samsung HP3 exploration version, 1/1.4 ", 0.56 μ m. 4 in 1 is 2.24 μ m. F1.65+OIS+7P lens+ALD ultra-low reflection coating. 800W IMX355 ultra wide angle+200W macro.

Although these two generations are both 200 million pixels (corresponding to 50 million OCLs), in the generation of Redmi Note 13 Pro+, the previous generation of CMOS was more inclined to the Samsung HPX (with DTI deep slot isolation), and switched to the Samsung HP3, which is more inclined to pixel fusion (improving the dynamic range of low pixel mode).

The opponents of this photo comparison are:

  • K60 Premium: IMX800,5000W,1 μ m. 1/1.49 ", F1.77+OIS. 800W IMX355 ultra wide angle.

  • vivo X90: IMX866,5000W,1 μ m. RGBW, F1.75+OIS. IMX663(1200W,1.22 μ m. 1/2.93 '', F1.98)+IMX663 ultra wide angle

  • OPPO Reno10 Pro+ :5000W,IMX890,1 μ m. 1/1.56 ", F1.8+OIS. 800W IMX355 ultra wide angle. 3 times periscope, 6400W, OV64B, 0.7 μ m. 1/2 ", F2.5, suspended prism OIS.


Ultra wide angle contrast


Ultra wide angle contrast 1, global and central amplification



Ultra wide angle contrast 2, global and central amplification


Ultra wide angle contrast 3, global and central amplification



Ultra wide angle contrast 4, global and central amplification


Subjective contrast

Focus contrast 1, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 2, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 3, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 4, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 5, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 6, global and central amplification


Main camera contrast 8, global and central amplification


"2x and 4x zoom" comparison


"2x zoom" 1, global and central magnification


"4x zoom" 1, central magnification


"2x zoom" 2, global and central magnification


"4x zoom" 2, central magnification


"2x zoom" 3, global and central magnification


"4x zoom" 3, central magnification


"2x zoom" 4, global and central magnification


"4x zoom" 4, central magnification



"2x zoom" 5, global and central magnification


"4x zoom" 5, central magnification


"2x zoom" 6, global and central magnification



"4x zoom" 6, central magnification

High pixel mode contrast

200 million pixels is 4 times of 50 million pixels, and the length and width are both 2 times of the relationship ↑


High pixel mode contrast 1, global and central amplification


High pixel mode contrast 2, global and central amplification


High pixel mode contrast 3, global and central amplification

Redmi Note 13 Pro+has a good photo taking experience and fast shutter response, Even the high pixel mode is fast , but slightly slower than K60 Premium, much faster than vivo X90, and the film rate is also good.

Super wide-angle Its performance is similar to that of K60 premium version (both Fage platform+IMX355), except that the automatic night view mode is darker, and the dynamic range is weak. Anyway, it is stronger than the 800W ultra wide angle of the same level of the green factory.

Main camera The photometry is close to what can be seen with the naked eye. It has a more obvious tendency to compress the dark part than OPPO. The saturation of the dark part is a little weak, the contrast of the picture is slightly higher, and the white balance is more accurate. MediaTek+Samsung sensor double buff, sharpening is also very strong.

The picture details are better than the K60 Premium (IMX800) and vivo X90 (IMX866, RGBW), which are equivalent to 23mm, and slightly weaker than the Reno10 Pro+(IXM890), which is equivalent to 24mm. The effect of high light pressure and low light noise reduction is slightly stronger than K60 Premium. single On the subject, it is slightly stronger than the K60 supreme version

That is, when encountering high frequency details at dense highlights, there will be a certain probability of false color at the color edge, as in Reno10 Pro+. When doing "double zoom", it will be more obvious.

There are two times and four times of the super division algorithm and HDR, which is more conscience:

  • "2x zoom" The IMX800/890 of K60 Premium and Reno10 Pro+can be rolled directly without any hesitation. The IMX663 can be opened five to five when facing the physical double of vivo X90, and the extreme details are even better.

  • "4x zoom" Compared with the double increase, it was not so obvious, and it was very light consuming, and fell down in the evening. There is a big gap between the effect of the two times physical telephoto superposition super division algorithm and the vivo X90, let alone the three times 6400W OV64B of Reno10 Pro+. However, in the weak light scene, when the friend cannot trigger the telephoto, it will return to the home court of Redmi Note 13 Pro+.

  • High pixel mode, It is easy to be "sandwiched" after taking several pictures in succession (seeing that the sample is reduced from 50MB to 30MB, it is likely that the algorithm is switched). In addition, in this version of firmware, 200 million pixels in professional mode seem to be a little stronger. Streaming saving means using high pixel mode in the daytime, Hit IMX800/866/890, these 50 megapixel 2 × 2 OCL sensors (there are only 12.5 million OCLs in fact), just like the younger brother.

 

summary

Compared with the previous generation, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+has stronger performance, screen and IP68, and it is still 400 yuan cheaper to match it. It also uses the same authentic 11 Pro+with 200 million pixel HP3 in almost all directions.

Redmi Note 13 Pro+is 200 yuan more expensive than the Pro version. It has replaced the curved screen+IP68+120W fast charge+stronger external amplifier and motor, but the CPU performance is weaker, the battery is smaller, there is no extremely advanced headphone port, and there is no dual band Beidou. It is difficult to make a decision

At this time node, if the performance requirements are not high, but there are requirements for photographing and peripheral configuration, Redmi Note 13 Pro+is truly peerless.

  • The mobile phones starting at 1899 yuan have flagship charging, 1.5K curved screen, main camera of daily use Xiaosheng IMX800/866/890, double digital zoom and high pixel mode of hanging 50 million pixel sensor (but photos really eat space), more than some flagship appearances, external amplifiers and vibration motors.

  • What's more, the 1899 yuan mobile phone has an IP68? Have I traversed several years? What year is this night?

  • What I feel most regretful is Tianji 7200 Ultra. Although it has a GPU close to the Snapdragon 870, its CPU performance cannot beat the Snapdragon 778G, and its endurance is average.

The second complaint is the name of the Redmi Note series. The general title is 30 characters, but the name "Redmi Note 13 Pro+" consumes 18 characters # @ ¥%@# ¥%!@#%#@ ¥!

Coupled with the hot mouth setting of Redmi Note series, "the same algebra, the name with T is the performance cost ratio, the name without T is the main photo and peripheral configuration, and the two series of plum blossom publishing", ordinary users are stunned.

It is recommended that the Redmi Note series be abbreviated and named with a short suffix such as Redmi 13X/F. As the old saying goes: renaming is like planting trees. The best time is 10 years ago, followed by now.


Follow our Weibo @ Love Computer

Follow our WeChat official account: playphone

Of course, we also pay attention to our Bilibili account: love computer

Share:
Scale
edit
Benefits!

Scan QR code and follow the author

Share Weibo Share WeChat
 Aigoji WeChat

Aigoji WeChat

 WeChat

WeChat

Recommended products

Sorry, the product you are looking for is not available in the product library

on trial